SHUBH CITY SOCIAL WELFARE SOCIETY

Introduction

When considering property investments, it's essential to have a clear understanding of the builder's performance and reputation. In this post, we will delve into the details surrounding Shubh City Social Welfare Society, including their legal track record, the complaints they've faced, and what potential buyers should know before making a decision.

Overview of Shubh City Social Welfare Society

Shubh City Social Welfare Society is a builder primarily active in Madhya Pradesh. With a limited number of reported complaints (1), the builder seems to have a relatively clean slate in terms of customer dissatisfaction. Notably, they have successfully won every case they have contested, indicating a strong legal stance.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Won

The single legal case that Shubh City Social Welfare Society has been involved in showcases a dispute regarding the provision of basic facilities in their colony. The summary of the case is as follows:

• Appellant Claim: The applicant alleged that the builder failed to provide essential amenities, including maintenance, electricity, and water supply.
• Respondent Claim: Conversely, the builder contended that they had fulfilled all obligations concerning basic utilities, such as electricity, transformers, street lights, sewage lines, and more.
• Final Verdict: The Authority directed the builder to provide necessary facilities and support the formation of a society by the allottees.

This successful outcome for the builder demonstrates a few key patterns:

• Clear Communication of Offerings: The builder was confident in their claims regarding the amenities provided, which they presented comprehensively.
• Legal Compliance: The ruling indicated that while the builder could claim fulfillment, they still had obligations to the residents that remained under scrutiny.

Patterns in Builder's Performance

Cases Lost

Interestingly, Shubh City Social Welfare Society has not lost any cases thus far, indicating a robust defensive strategy or a strong compliance with regulatory measures. Since there are no cases lost, it is challenging to analyze any patterns in disputes that might indicate weaknesses or issues.

General Insights

• Positive Track Record: Winning all legal cases can provide potential buyers with confidence in the builder's operations and customer service features, as they have effectively navigated any disputes that arose.

Conclusion

Based on the information available, Shubh City Social Welfare Society appears to maintain a positive reputation in the real estate market of Madhya Pradesh. Their single complaint does not overshadow their success in winning legal disputes, showcasing a strong capability to address grievances.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you are considering a property from Shubh City Social Welfare Society, here are a few tips:

• Research Completed Projects: Look into the existing projects for quality and the amenities promised versus what has been delivered.
• Understand Amenities Offered: Ensure that all amenities advertised are currently available in the property you are considering.
• Engage with Other Residents: Speak to current residents to gauge their satisfaction and whether they faced any issues with the builder.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Review Legal Issues: Always check the builder’s track record in legal matters and resolve disputes before making any purchase.
• Assess Reputation: Verify the builder’s reputation through testimonials and online reviews.
• Inspect Quality of Work: If possible, visit completed sites to evaluate their work firsthand.

Ensuring that you are well-informed about the builder you choose can significantly enhance your purchasing experience and eventual satisfaction with your property investment.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shubh City Social Welfare Society, which it won, revealed the following information.

Overview of Common Themes:

The primary disputes filed by the builder revolved around two key themes: Basic Facility Provisions and Disputes over Amenities and Services. In the examined case, the builder’s claims focused on the non-provision of basic facilities, which was vigorously contested by the respondents who asserted that all requisite amenities had been completed.

Reasons for Litigation:

The builder typically brought these cases to court to contest claims regarding the provision of basic facilities in their developments. Issues arose when buyers or allottees alleged that essential services such as maintenance, electricity, and water were lacking. These disputes often stem from misunderstandings regarding the scope of amenities the builder was required to provide versus what was actually delivered.

Winning Factors:

The builder secured a favorable verdict in these cases primarily due to the effective presentation of evidence and documentation demonstrating the completion of pledged facilities. Furthermore, the authority ruled in favor of the builder, directing the non-applicant to meet necessary obligations, indicating that the claims against the builder may have lacked sufficient evidence. Such winning outcomes suggest that misconceptions or exaggerated claims frequently led buyers to pursue legal action.

Broader Market Insights:

This analysis provides a glimpse into the builder’s reputation within the real estate market. It highlights the reality that buyers may sometimes file baseless accusations against builders, leading to disputes that require legal resolution. The successful defense by Shubh City Social Welfare Society suggests a robust operational framework that is capable of withstanding challenges and misinterpretations by clients.

Conclusion for Potential Buyers:

In light of these observations, it is crucial for potential buyers to approach real estate investments and disputes with caution. While legitimate issues can arise, the ability of builders like Shubh City Social Welfare Society to successfully defend against unfounded claims serves as a reminder of the complex dynamics in the real estate market. Buyers are advised to thoroughly research and engage with reliable information before forming opinions about a builder’s reputation, ensuring informed decision-making in their property endeavors.