SHUBH ENTERPRISE logo

SHUBH ENTERPRISE

5.0/5 (7 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Maharashtra
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the bustling real estate market of Maharashtra, builders come and go, but the reputations they form can last for years. One such builder is SHUBH ENTERPRISE, which has recently come under scrutiny due to several legal complaints. In this post, we will dive deep into the complaint history of SHUBH ENTERPRISE, analyze patterns from their cases, and offer insights for potential buyers.

Complaint Overview

SHUBH ENTERPRISE has faced a total of 7 complaints, and notably, they have won all 7 cases without any losses. While it might initially appear that the builder has a solid track record, a closer look at the nature of these complaints reveals areas of concern that potential buyers should be aware of.

Legal Cases Overview

Despite winning all the legal challenges filed against them, the outcomes indicate that the builder has actively engaged in disputes primarily related to contractual obligations with flat …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Privity of Contract Disputes Claims for Agreement Execution Allegations Against New Developers/Societies

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHUBH ENTERPRISE, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases generally revolved around disputes regarding privity of contract, claims for executing agreements, and allegations against new developers or housing societies. Buyers and other stakeholders claimed that new developers should be liable for past agreements, holding them accountable for fulfilling claims made by flat purchasers. However, the decisions consistently highlighted a lack of contractual relationships between buyers and the new developers or societies involved, leading to dismissals of these claims.

These cases were brought to court for several reasons, primarily centered on contesting penalties associated with project delays or demanding execution of agreements for sale. Buyers sought recourse based on their perceptions of contractual obligations that were allegedly disregarded by new builders or managing societies. The recurring theme in these complaints was the assumption of rights over agreements made with …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review