SHUBHAKMANA ASSOCIATES

Introduction

In the dynamic world of real estate, the reputation of a builder can make or break potential homebuyers' dreams. Today, we delve into the profile of Shubhakmana Associates, a builder that operates in the state of Chhattisgarh. Notably, they have a mixed record when it comes to legal disputes, highlighting important considerations for prospective buyers.

Builder Overview

Shubhakmana Associates has had a relatively quiet legal history with only 1 complaint filed against them. Remarkably, they have won 1 case and lost none, reflecting a certain level of effectiveness in managing legal issues. This favorable outcome could be appealing to buyers; however, a closer examination of their legal history reveals further insights.

Legal Case Details

Let's take a closer look at the legal case filed against Shubhakmana Associates:

• Case Overview: The complaint focused on the builder's alleged failure to keep the quarterly project progress updated on the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) portal, a legal requirement.
• Appellant Claim: The appellant argued that the builder did not provide timely updates, which are crucial for transparency and accountability.
• Respondent Claim: In defense, Shubhakmana Associates asserted that the necessary updates had indeed been submitted, although the appellant could not find them online.
• Final Verdict: The case concluded with Shubhakmana Associates successfully demonstrating that they had submitted the required updates, which led to the closure of the case.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

In the solitary case that Shubhakmana Associates faced, the issue revolved around transparency and compliance with RERA regulations. The common factor in this instance was the communication gap regarding project updates. While the builder eventually proved compliance, such situations can raise concerns for buyers about the reliability and transparency of ongoing project information.

Cases Won

Since the builder has not lost any cases apart from the one mentioned, it is evident that when disputes had arisen, Shubhakmana Associates managed to defend itself effectively. The ability to resolve issues, especially regarding legal compliance, indicates a willingness to adhere to mandatory regulations and protect their business reputation.

Conclusion

Overall, Shubhakmana Associates presents a profile of a builder that has navigated a legal challenge with a positive outcome while maintaining a clean slate in terms of lost cases. Though only one complaint is on record, the incident does highlight potential concerns surrounding communication and project transparency.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Do Your Research: Before purchasing, check for any complaints against the builder and their resolutions. Look for transparency in their communication.
2. Engage with Existing Buyers: Speak to other individuals who have purchased properties from Shubhakmana Associates to gather insights about their experiences.
3. Keep Up with Project Updates: Stay informed on project progress through RERA portals and other communication channels to avoid any surprises.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Check Legal History: Always review a builder's legal background and the outcomes of any complaints.
• Evaluate Reputation: Look for positive reviews and testimonials to gauge the builder's credibility and reliability.
• Consult Professionals: Engage real estate agents or legal advisors when considering significant investments in property to ensure informed decision-making.

In summary, while Shubhakmana Associates has showcased the ability to handle disputes effectively, potential buyers should remain diligent about project communications and transparency to navigate their home-buying journey.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shubhakmana Associates, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily revolved around three key themes: Regulatory Non-compliance, Project Management Disputes, and Evidence and Documentation Disagreements.

Each of these themes provides insight into the nature of the complaints and the builder's responses.

Within the theme of Regulatory Non-compliance, one notable case involved a claim regarding the failure to update project progress on the RERA portal.

The opposing party alleged that the builder did not comply with legal obligations to keep potential buyers informed, while the builder defended itself by demonstrating that updates had been submitted.

This emphasizes a central issue in many disputes where buyers may claim non-compliance, leading to scrutiny of the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements.

Project Management Disputes also surfaced as a common category of contention, mainly when opposing parties contested penalties for project delays or raised concerns about communication and documentation practices.

Buyers often feel frustrated when they perceive delays or lack of information, which leads to legal actions against builders.

In the category of Evidence and Documentation Disagreements, the summaries highlighted cases where the builders successfully defended themselves due to the opposing party's failure to provide substantive evidence.

In these instances, the builders were able to contend that the claims were exaggerated or misinterpreted, demonstrating their capability to manage disputes effectively.

The reasons these cases were brought to court primarily consist of buyers contesting penalties, alleging project delays, or disagreements over regulatory compliance.

It is noteworthy that buyers sometimes embark on these legal paths based on misunderstandings or an inability to find proper documentation, which can lead to unnecessary disputes.

The successes achieved by Shubhakmana Associates in defending against these claims often stemmed from insufficient evidence on the part of the accusers, proper adherence to legal guidelines, and the builder's diligence in maintaining required documentation.

This reflects the builder's commitment to transparency and accountability in their operations.

Such outcomes suggest a broader trend in the real estate market where buyers may occasionally make unfounded allegations against builders (perhaps influenced by emotions during real estate negotiations), thereby leading to protracted legal battles.

It is crucial for buyers to recognize that while there are indeed legitimate disputes in the sector, builders like Shubhakmana Associates can frequently defend themselves robustly against unjust claims.

Hence, potential buyers are advised to approach claims thoughtfully. Due diligence in understanding the nuances between legitimate grievances and unfounded accusations is essential.

Making informed decisions based on reliable information will empower buyers to navigate the complexities of real estate transactions while distinguishing between the good and the bad builders.