SHUBHANGAN CONSTRUCTION

Understanding Shubhangan Construction: A Review of Legal Proceedings and Buyer Considerations

When choosing a builder for your dream home, it becomes crucial to assess their track record, especially in legal matters. In this post, we delve into the details surrounding Shubhangan Construction, a builder operating in Chhattisgarh, examining the number of complaints against them, their history in legal battles, and the implications for potential buyers.

Overview of Shubhangan Construction

Shubhangan Construction is a builder based in Chhattisgarh, with a recorded history of facing legal challenges. They have been the subject of one complaint and lost that case, which brought their total of cases won to zero. This track record raises flags for potential clients who are considering their services.

Legal Case Analysis

Case Details

The single legal case against Shubhangan Construction revolved around the lack of mandatory documentation needed for project registration. The appellant claimed that the builder had failed to submit all required documents, while the builder asserted that they had complied with all necessary regulations, including submission of fees. The final verdict saw the application for registration rejected, leading to a penalty of Rs. 20,000 and a ban on buying and selling in the project due to non-registration.

Patterns Identified

• Common Factors in Lost Cases: The lost case suggests a trend where inadequate submission of required documentation can jeopardize a builder’s operations. In this instance, the inability to register the project effectively halted business activities and caused financial penalties.
• Common Factors in Won Cases: Shubhangan Construction has not recorded any wins in legal cases, indicating a consistent struggle with meeting regulatory requirements and possibly lacking sufficient legal fortitude to defend against claims.

Conclusion and Buyer Assessment

Based on the information at hand, Shubhangan Construction appears to have significant shortcomings in regulatory compliance. The builder's sole legal setback, coupled with their lack of successful defenses in other disputes, paints a concerning picture for potential buyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers:

1. Thoroughly Research the Builder: Before making a purchase, investigate the builder’s history, including any complaints and how they have resolved them.
2. Scrutinize Legal Standing: Pay attention to any legal cases filed against the builder and their outcomes to understand potential risks.
3. Demand Transparency: Ensure that all necessary documentation is provided and that the builder complies with local regulations.
4. Seek Reviews and Testimonials: Look for feedback from previous customers to gauge their satisfaction and the builder’s responsiveness to issues.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:

• Check Credentials: Verify the builder's licensing and accreditation.
• Visit Past Projects: If possible, view previously completed projects to assess quality and execution.
• Consult Professionals: Engage real estate professionals or legal experts for guidance when evaluating a builder.

In conclusion, while Shubhangan Construction may offer appealing options, prospective buyers should exercise caution and diligence by researching the builder’s legal reputation and operational history extensively. This approach will help ensure that one makes an informed decision when investing in real estate.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shubhangan Construction, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues in three primary areas: regulatory compliance disputes, penalties for non-registration, and documentation submissions.

The first theme, regulatory compliance disputes, encompasses the builder's difficulties adhering to the necessary legal and regulatory requirements for project registration. In the sole case summarized, the builder contested the claim that they had not submitted all mandatory documents for registration, asserting that they had provided everything required. However, the verdict indicated otherwise, leading to a rejection of their application, a financial penalty, and a ban on further transactions in the project. This case illustrates a pattern where builders may face litigation due to alleged non-compliance, often resulting in significant operational and financial repercussions.

The reason people commonly bring such cases to court includes contesting penalties imposed for regulatory breaches and disputing the builder's accountability in project delays or complications. In the case of Shubhangan Construction, the penalty of Rs. 20,000 suggests a systemic issue where builders may not prioritize compliance, leading to legal challenges.

Examining the outcomes reveals that builders tend to lose these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of compliance or proper documentation. The case against Shubhangan Construction is particularly notable, as it demonstrates a clear failure to meet regulatory standards, which is a recurring theme in many legal disputes involving builders.

Overall, these cases serve as a cautionary tale for prospective buyers, emphasizing the importance of thorough due diligence. Buyers should look for builders with a proven track record of regulatory compliance and timely project completion to mitigate risks in their real estate investments.