CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Choosing the right builder for your home is a crucial decision that can significantly impact your living experience and investment. One such builder that has made its mark in the real estate industry of Gujarat is Shubharambh Homes Partnership Firm. This blog post will explore the builder’s reputation based on customer complaints, legal battles, and the outcomes of those cases.
Shubharambh Homes operates within the state of Gujarat and has a relatively modest number of complaints—only one recorded complaint against them. While their history of legal disputes is limited, a deeper dive into the single complaint reveals insights that potential buyers should consider before making their purchase decisions.
There has been one noteworthy legal case involving Shubharambh Homes. The complainant stated that the builder failed to provide promised amenities featured in their promotional brochure, notably the clubhouse facilities, gym equipment, and proper maintenance of the society. In response, Shubharambh Homes argued that they had delivered the promised facilities but noted that the allottee association had not fully assumed control over the administration of the society.
In the end, the RERA authority partially upheld the complaint and mandated the builder to fulfill their obligations regarding the promised facilities. They were also ordered to ensure the maintenance charges were appropriately deposited in the allottee association's bank account.
Although the builder has only one recorded case that they have lost, the common factors in this case highlight potential areas of concern. The complaint centers around unmet expectations regarding provided facilities that were explicitly outlined in promotional materials. This suggests that buyers should be particularly vigilant about understanding what is promised in the marketing collateral versus what is delivered.
In the single case where the builder won a partial verdict, the ruling indicated a level of ambiguity or contention about the administration's responsibility between the builder and the allottees' association. This suggests that buyers should ensure they have a clear understanding of the roles, responsibilities, and governance structures in place within their housing societies. The verdict implies that while the builder may deliver facilities, ongoing maintenance and administration may require active engagement from the homeowners as well.
Overall, the data presents a mixed outlook for Shubharambh Homes. With only one complaint leading to a legal outcome, it appears the builder has faced some challenges regarding customer satisfaction and service delivery. For potential buyers considering a property from Shubharambh Homes, here are some tips to keep in mind:
In conclusion, while Shubharambh Homes has begun building its reputation in Gujarat, potential buyers should proceed with due diligence and an informed mindset to ensure a satisfactory home-buying experience.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Shubharambh Homes Partnership Firm, where the builder lost, reveals several insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: Failure to Deliver Promised Facilities and Disputes over Maintenance Responsibilities.
The first theme encompasses complaints made by homeowners regarding the builder's inability to provide promised amenities, such as club house facilities and gym equipment. These cases often arise from discrepancies between what is advertised in promotional materials and the actual delivery of services. Homebuyers expect a certain standard of living, and when builders fail to meet these expectations without valid reasons or clear communication, it inevitably leads to legal action.
The second theme involves disputes over who is responsible for the maintenance of the society— the builder or the allottees' association. In the case summarized, the builder claimed that they had fulfilled their obligations but that the association had not taken over administrative duties. This points to a broader issue of communication and role definition in real estate projects, which can often lead to misunderstandings and litigation.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include the builder’s failure to honor agreements, disputes over operational responsibilities, and accusations of subpar delivery of promised facilities. The builder’s repeated litigation suggests a systemic issue with either their operational practices or their communication strategies, or perhaps both.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to meet the promised standards, combined with a lack of clear communication regarding their responsibilities and those of the homeowners' association. The RERA authority's decision mandating the builder to fulfill their obligations highlights a legal recognition of the builder's shortcomings and serves as a warning to future buyers considering projects from this developer.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!