CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the dynamic landscape of real estate, choosing the right builder is pivotal to ensuring a smooth home buying experience. This blog post delves into Shubhlakshmi Homes, a builder operating in Gujarat, highlighting critical information regarding its legal history and overall credibility.
The single case against Shubhlakshmi Homes illustrates a trend where the builder cited a lack of awareness regarding legal requirements. This suggests a potential gap in adherence to regulatory obligations and a need for better compliance education within the organization.
Notably, Shubhlakshmi Homes has not won any legal cases, which could signify challenges in effectively managing legal responsibilities and customer expectations.
In light of the available data, Shubhlakshmi Homes presents a mixed picture for potential buyers. With one recorded complaint and a lost case related to RERA violations, the builder's reputation might be twofold, reflecting some operational challenges.
In conclusion, while Shubhlakshmi Homes operates within Gujarat and has potential offerings, prospective buyers are encouraged to approach with caution, informed by the builder's legal challenges and commitment to regulatory compliance.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shubhlakshmi Homes, which they lost, reveals significant insights into the disputes faced by the builder.
One of the most common themes emerging from the cases involves Regulatory Non-compliance, specifically violations of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The builder was noted to have failed to submit quarterly reports as mandated, showcasing a recurring issue of not adhering to regulatory obligations. This non-compliance not only led to disputes but also resulted in the imposition of penalties, hence reflecting poorly on the builder's reputation.
A critical overview of these types of cases shows that the builder primarily brought them to court contesting Penalties for Violation of the RERA Act. In this instance, Shubhlakshmi Homes contended that they were not aware of the law and lacked the intention to break the regulations. However, this defense proved insufficient when juxtaposed with the respondent's claim illustrating clear instances of non-compliance.
Common triggers for the builder’s litigation appear to stem from misunderstandings about legal requirements, specifically the obligations outlined within regulatory frameworks. The builder’s primary reason for engaging in legal disputes was to contest the penalties imposed for regulatory lapses, which they attempted to attribute to a lack of awareness rather than an outright violation.
Examining the reasons behind why the builder lost these cases indicates a pattern of insufficient evidence supporting their claims. The defenses they presented often failed to demonstrate a strong understanding of the legal framework they operated within, which ultimately led to unfavorable verdicts. Additionally, their claims of ignorance regarding legal obligations were not convincing enough to mitigate the consequences of their actions.
In conclusion, the experiences of Shubhlakshmi Homes serve as a cautionary tale that underscores the importance of regulatory compliance for builders in the real estate sector. It highlights the critical need for builders to be well-informed about legal requirements and to adhere strictly to them to avoid unnecessary litigation and penalties.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!