| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
An In-Depth Look at SIDDHI DEVELOPERS: Assessing Performance and Consumer Feedback
When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home, potential buyers frequently turn to past performance indicators to gauge reliability. In this blog post, we'll examine SIDDHI DEVELOPERS, a builder operating in Gujarat, as we delve into their track record based on legal cases and consumer feedback.
Overview of SIDDHI DEVELOPERS
SIDDHI DEVELOPERS has garnered mixed reviews from its clientele, as demonstrated by their complaint statistics. With a total of 19 complaints lodged against them, they have won 2 cases and lost 17 cases. This raises questions about their credibility and customer satisfaction that we aim to uncover.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost by SIDDHI DEVELOPERS
Construction Defects Case
In one of the significant cases where SIDDHI DEVELOPERS was defeated, the complainants alleged construction defects and sought compensation. The builder contended that the complainant failed to …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Siddhi Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns across the disputes. The primary topics of contention can be grouped into two main categories: the formation of associations of allottees and the adequacy of parking space provided in projects.
The overwhelming majority of the cases centered around the claim that Siddhi Developers had not formed an association of allottees by way of a co-operative housing society as sought by the complainants. This highlights a significant area of concern for buyers who are looking for proper management and organization in their residential complexes. The builder's defense consistently revolved around their assertion that such associations had already been formed and were actively participating in management decisions, which raises questions about communication gaps or misunderstandings between the builder and the homeowners.
Another recurring theme, albeit less prominent, was the claim of inadequate parking space …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SIDDHI DEVELOPERS, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes predominantly revolve around the construction of viable associations for allottees and the management of associated funds, highlighting significant themes in real estate dealings.
- Formation of Allottee Associations - Many cases centered on the challenge of establishing a formal association of allottees, which is a crucial step in managing communal responsibilities. In the case summaries analyzed, complainants raised concerns that the builder had not formed an association, which is essential for collective decision-making and governance among homeowners. However, the builder argued that participation in an existing association demonstrated that there was a functioning framework already in place.
- Management of Maintenance Funds - Closely related to the above theme, the issue of how maintenance funds are managed and allocated often surfaced. The builder successfully defended its position by asserting …
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SIDDHI DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
Construction Defects Claims
The primary type of case observed involves allegations of construction defects made by buyers. In this particular instance, the complainant alleged that their flat was riddled with defects and sought compensation from the builder.
Claims Handling Procedures
Another common theme in the disputes pertains to the appropriate procedure for filing complaints and claims. In the cited case, the builder successfully defended against the accusations by highlighting the complainant's failure to adhere to the proper protocol required for claiming compensation.
These cases underscore that buyers or regulatory entities may bring the builder to court for a variety of reasons, often stemming from dissatisfaction with construction quality, perceived failures in service delivery, or misunderstandings regarding procedural requirements for lodging complaints. A recurring pattern emerges …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!