| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When exploring potential homebuilders, it's essential to scrutinize their track record, especially regarding legal disputes. One such builder, Siddhivinayak Developers, has had a tumultuous legal history marked by numerous complaints and varied outcomes in legal cases. This blog delves into their legal performance, analyzing both the cases they have won and lost, and provides guidance for potential homebuyers.
Overview of Siddhivinayak Developers
Siddhivinayak Developers operates in two prominent states: Gujarat and Maharashtra. Over time, they have faced 27 complaints, out of which they have won 2 cases and lost 25 cases. This unsatisfactory outcome raises critical questions regarding their business practices and consumer satisfaction.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost by Siddhivinayak Developers
A significant number of cases (25 out of 27 total complaints) have ended unfavorably for Siddhivinayak Developers. Several common themes can be discerned from these losses:
- Failure to Comply with Regulations: In …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Siddhivinayak Developers, which they lost, reveals a concerning pattern of legal issues predominantly centered around their inability to meet regulatory requirements and fulfill commitments to their clients.
The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes:
Delayed Possession Claims - Multiple complainants cited failure to receive possession of their booked flats, leading to refunds and interest being awarded in their favor. Non-compliance with RERA Act - multiple penalties were imposed on the builder for not adhering to the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, particularly concerning timely submission of reports and project registrations. Project Completion and Handover Disputes - multiple instances where the builder failed to complete projects on time or hand over the possession, which resulted in legal actions against them. Refund and Interest Claims - Numerous cases involved buyers seeking refunds due to stalled projects or failure to deliver what …Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Siddhivinayak Developers, which it lost, revealed several insights regarding the nature and frequency of disputes. The key recurring themes involved issues of regulatory non-compliance, delayed reporting, and the imposition of penalties for failing to meet legal obligations.
The primary category observed is 'Regulatory Non-compliance.' This theme often stems from a failure by the builder to adhere to the stipulated guidelines and timelines set forth by governing bodies. In the case of 'Ashta Tapovan,' the builder's claim of timely report submission was challenged, leading to effective penalties imposed by the court.
A significant trigger for litigation appears to be the builder’s efforts to contest penalties, often resulting from allegations of delays and non-compliance. The builder frequently disputes project delays, attempting to attribute fault to external factors instead of acknowledging lapses in their own processes. As exhibited in the aforementioned case, the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Siddhivinayak developers, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes can be grouped under a few common themes, primarily: Failure to Submit Necessary Documentation, Disputes Over Amenities Provided, and Disputes Over Entitlement to Relief. These themes highlight the recurring conflicts between the builder and the complainants, indicating areas of potential miscommunication and unmet expectations.
In several cases, opposing parties claimed that Siddhivinayak developers did not follow through with required documentation, such as timely submissions of final reports. In a notable instance, the appellants claimed adherence to protocols, while the builder maintained that they had indeed violated submission timelines. This conflict led to penalties being imposed on the appellants, underscoring the importance of compliance with contractual obligations.
Additionally, some cases revolved around claims that the builder failed to provide amenities as per the agreed specifications. The opposing …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!