builder logo

SIGNATURE DWELLINGS PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 2
  • States (Active in): Karnataka
CIN U70200KL2012PTC030293
Year Established 18-Jan-12
Address 29/208 B, KOUSHTUBHAM, LANE NO 28, JANATHA ROAD, VYTTILA P O KOCHI KL 682019 IN
Company Status Private

Understanding Signature Dwellings Private Limited: A Comprehensive Review

When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home or investment property, conducting thorough research is crucial. This post focuses on Signature Dwellings Private Limited, a builder active in Karnataka, to provide potential buyers with insights into their operations based on complaint records and case outcomes.

Overview of Signature Dwellings Private Limited

Signature Dwellings Private Limited has registered a total of two complaints against it. Unfortunately, the builder has not won any legal cases related to these complaints, indicating a concerning track record in terms of customer satisfaction and dispute resolution. Here’s a deeper look into the specifics of these cases and the implications for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Details

  1. Nature of Complaints:
    Both complaints lodged against Signature Dwellings revolve around similar issues:
    - The complainants argued that the builder charged based on the super built-up area rather than the carpet area.
    - Allegations were made regarding defective parking provisions.
  2. Builder's Defense:
    The builder maintained that the complainants had accepted the terms and conditions outlined in their agreement, which was signed on 27/11/2020.
  3. Verdict:
    In the outcomes of these cases, the complaints were partly allowed, which resulted in the builder being directed to:
    - Provide an appropriate car parking space as per BBMP Building Bye-laws, 2003.
    - Transfer the common area to the association of allottees once the association is formed.

From these outcomes, it is clear that while the builder did not win the cases outright, they were ordered to comply with certain regulations and requirements, reflecting an acknowledgment of some grievances presented by the complainants.

Patterns and Analysis

Common Factors in Lost Cases:
- Pricing Transparency: There is a recurring theme of dissatisfaction stemming from the pricing model based on the super built-up area rather than the more favorable carpet area.
- Defective Provisions: Issues related to inadequate or defective amenities, specifically parking, were also highlighted, indicating a potential oversight in quality control or customer service.
Common Factors in Won Cases (None):
It is important to note that the builder has not won any legal cases, highlighting a continuous struggle in achieving favorable rulings in disputes.

Conclusion: Assessing Signature Dwellings Private Limited

Based on the data presented, Signature Dwellings Private Limited carries a questionable reputation from a legal perspective, given the lack of any cases won and the nature of the complaints against them. Potential buyers should approach with caution, ensuring they thoroughly review agreements and represent their needs clearly.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Review Agreements Thoroughly: Always read through the terms and conditions before signing. Make sure to clarify any areas that seem ambiguous, especially regarding pricing methods and facility provisions.
  2. Seek Clarity on Amenities: Ensure you understand the amenities included in your project, particularly regarding parking or any shared facilities.
  3. Research Builder Reputation: Look beyond just the legal records. Speaking with current residents or past customers could provide insights into the builder's reliability and service quality.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Evaluate Past Projects: Research past projects by the builder to assess quality and construction standards.
  • Check for Reviews and Testimonials: Online reviews, ratings, and testimonials from previous clients can offer valuable information about the builder’s reliability and quality of work.
  • Consult Legal Expertise: It's advisable to have legal counsel review any contracts to ensure that your interests are adequately protected.

While Signature Dwellings Private Limited continues to operate within Karnataka, the cautionary notes presented in this article are vital for anyone considering investing their hard-earned money in a property with this builder.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Charges Based on Super Built-up Area Defective Parking Provisions Compliance with Municipal Building Bye-laws

Analysis of the cases filed against Signature Dwellings Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes presented. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: charges based on the super built-up area and defective parking provisions, both of which highlight significant issues in the builder's adherence to accepted practices and regulatory compliance.

The first theme, concerning charges based on the super built-up area, indicates a major point of contention between the builder and the complainants. The complainants claimed that they were charged for the super built-up area rather than the carpet area, which is the actual usable space within the property. This raises a critical issue about transparency and ethical billing practices in real estate transactions.

The second theme, regarding defective parking provisions, shows another failure on the part of the builder to meet the expectations and legal requirements set by the Bangalore Municipal Building Bye-laws (BBMP Building Bye-laws, 2003). The complainants reported receiving inadequate parking, which reflects a common problem in rapidly urbanizing areas where parking space is at a premium.

The verdicts in these cases mandate the builder to rectify the parking situation and transfer common areas to the association of allottees once formed, thereby emphasizing the need for builders to consider community needs and comply with regulatory frameworks.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder’s losses are primarily due to a combination of overcharging based on misleading space calculations and non-compliance with established building bylaws. There was also a lack of responsiveness to the complainants' legitimate concerns regarding parking and common area allocations.

The builder's defense consistently cited the signed agreement of sale, indicating a reliance on contractual obligations rather than a commitment to customer satisfaction or legal compliance. This highlights a significant concern for potential buyers who must weigh the risks associated with a builder's past legal issues when considering a purchase.

Overall, these cases serve as a crucial warning for prospective buyers to conduct thorough research and ensure that builders are transparent, compliant with regulations, and respectful of contractual obligations before making any commitments.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
CMP/220408/0009335 Karnataka Complaint against M/s SIGNATURE DWELLINGS PRIVATE… ["Defective parking… {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claim that … SIGNATURE DWELLINGS… https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3380779

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins