SIGNATURE DWELLINGS PRIVATE LIMITED logo

SIGNATURE DWELLINGS PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Karnataka
CINU70200KL2012PTC030293
Year EstablishedNot Available
Address29/208 B, KOUSHTUBHAM, LANE NO 28, JANATHA ROAD, VYTTILA P O KOCHI KL 682019 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Understanding Signature Dwellings Private Limited: A Comprehensive Review

When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home or investment property, conducting thorough research is crucial. This post focuses on Signature Dwellings Private Limited, a builder active in Karnataka, to provide potential buyers with insights into their operations based on complaint records and case outcomes.

Overview of Signature Dwellings Private Limited

Signature Dwellings Private Limited has registered a total of two complaints against it. Unfortunately, the builder has not won any legal cases related to these complaints, indicating a concerning track record in terms of customer satisfaction and dispute resolution. Here’s a deeper look into the specifics of these cases and the implications for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Details

  1. Nature of Complaints:
    Both complaints lodged against Signature Dwellings revolve around similar issues:
    - The complainants argued that the builder charged based on the super built-up area rather …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Charges Based on Super Built-up Area Defective Parking Provisions Compliance with Municipal Building Bye-laws

Analysis of the cases filed against Signature Dwellings Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes presented. The cases primarily revolve around two main topics: charges based on the super built-up area and defective parking provisions, both of which highlight significant issues in the builder's adherence to accepted practices and regulatory compliance.

The first theme, concerning charges based on the super built-up area, indicates a major point of contention between the builder and the complainants. The complainants claimed that they were charged for the super built-up area rather than the carpet area, which is the actual usable space within the property. This raises a critical issue about transparency and ethical billing practices in real estate transactions.

The second theme, regarding defective parking provisions, shows another failure on the part of the builder to meet the expectations and legal requirements set by the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review