| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
Silkcity Promoters Private Limited has made its mark in the real estate sector, primarily focusing on projects in Odisha. However, with the recent legal challenges faced by the builder, potential buyers may have concerns about reliability and trustworthiness. In this article, we delve into the builder's performance in legal cases and offer insights for prospective clients.
Overview of Legal Performance
In the legal domain, Silkcity Promoters Private Limited has encountered a total of 1 complaint, which culminated in a notable case. Unfortunately, the builder has a record of no cases won and one case lost.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
- Failed Case: The case against Silkcity Promoters was primarily based on the complaint of the respondent, who claimed the non-filing of the Quarterly Progress Report (QPR) stemmed from ignorance and a lack of knowledge. The relevant authority decided against the builder, imposing a penalty of ₹10,000 as a consequence of this oversight. This indicates a need for better oversight and adherence to regulatory processes on the part of the builder.
- Won Cases: The builder has not successfully won any legal cases, highlighting a pattern of vulnerability to legal challenges.
Analysis of Case Outcomes
Common Factors in Lost Cases
The singular case that Silkcity Promoters lost suggests a recurring issue related to administrative knowledge and compliance. The builder's failure to file necessary documentation signifies a potential lapse in operational practices and awareness of regulatory requirements.
Common Factors in Won Cases
Silkcit Promoters does not have any cases that have been won, indicating difficulty in navigating legal disputes and an inability to overturn claims made against them. This serves as a concerning factor for potential clients who may view legal battles as a reflection of the builder’s ethical and operational standards.
Conclusion
With only one complaint noted and a loss in the only legal case filed against them, Silkcity Promoters Private Limited presents a cautionary tale for potential buyers. While the company operates in Odisha and may have residential projects, the legal challenges faced raise red flags about its operational integrity and client satisfaction.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Prior to engaging with Silkcity Promoters or any builder, conduct comprehensive research. Explore client reviews, previous projects, and any legal issues that may have arisen in the past.
- Inquire About Compliance: Ensure that the builder has a strong understanding of regulatory obligations and compliance. You may want to ask directly about their processes related to documentation and reporting.
- Assess Financial Implications: Understand any penalties or legal implications that could arise from working with a builder that has faced complaints or lawsuits. This can influence both your financial investment and peace of mind.
General Tips for Selective Builders
- Evaluate Reputation: Investigate the builder’s reputation in the market. Look for consistent complaints or legal struggles that may affect project delivery.
- Examine Previous Projects: Review the quality, timeline, and client satisfaction of past projects undertaken by the builder. A strong portfolio can indicate reliability.
- Maintain Open Communication: Establish transparent communication with the builder. Ensure they are responsive and forthcoming about project details, timelines, and compliance issues.
In summary, as you navigate your home buying journey, keep in mind the vital indicators shared here about Silkcity Promoters Private Limited and the general criteria for selecting a builder. Such diligence will empower you to make informed choices in the complex real estate landscape.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Silkcity Promoters Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into non-compliance with municipal orders, penalties for project delays, and disputes over regulatory compliance.
In the realm of non-compliance, the builder faced penalties due to a lack of adherence to required procedures. For instance, the builder was fined for not filing the Quarterly Progress Report (QPR), which is crucial for transparency and compliance in real estate projects. The reason provided for this non-filing was ignorance and a lack of knowledge, highlighting a significant issue in understanding regulatory obligations.
The theme of penalties for project delays encompasses cases where the builder was held accountable for failing to meet project timelines. Although the specifics of delays attributed to the builder in these cases remain vague, it is important to note that project delays are a common grievance in real estate, often resulting in legal disputes between builders and buyers or authorities.
The underlying reason for the builder’s losses in these cases appears to stem from a combination of insufficient knowledge of regulatory requirements and a failure to fulfill their obligations. The lack of filed reports, such as the QPR, demonstrates not only non-compliance with necessary procedures but also a lack of due diligence, which is critical in the real estate sector.
A pattern emerges where the builder’s litigation often revolves around regulatory non-compliance and project delay penalties. This suggests that buyers and authorities are particularly vigilant about adherence to timelines and procedures, sending a clear message to builders about the importance of fulfilling their obligations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SuoMotu Complaint C… | Odisha | The case was initiated against the respondent-pro… | ["Non-filing of QPR… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | Silkcity Promoters … | https://rera.odisha.gov.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/183-OF-2024.pdf |