SILVERCITY HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
- No of Complaints: 4
- States (Active in): Punjab
| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
An Overview of Silvercity Housing and Infrastructure Limited
Silvercity Housing and Infrastructure Limited is a builder primarily focused on projects in Punjab. While they have faced a few complaints, their legal history reflects a notable trend: they have yet to lose a case against them. In fact, they've consistently won all legal disputes they were involved in. Let’s delve deeper into their performance based on the provided data.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
Despite having only 4 complaints filed against them, an intriguing aspect comes to light. All cases where the builder was implicated were ultimately rejected. Here's a summary of the claims:
- Claim Summary: Each case filed against Silvercity involved appellants asserting that their project was not registered with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). The appellants sought relief based on this claim, anticipating action or resolution from the court.
- Builder’s Argument: In response, Silvercity Housing maintained that their project did indeed hold registration with the RERA and asserted that the court had jurisdiction to handle the complaints.
- Verdict: All four complaints were dismissed as 'not maintainable', hinging on the lack of project registration with the RERA as claimed by the appellants. This consistent dismissal indicates that the complaints lacked sufficient legal basis.
Cases Won
On the flip side, it’s vital to note that Silvercity has navigated their legal challenges successfully, winning all cases against them without incurring losses. This track record could signify a strong legal framework and operational integrity, assuming their project registrations are indeed compliant with RERA requirements. The absence of any losses suggests a favorable standing in terms of contractual obligations and project delivery.
Common Patterns
When assessing the complaints:
- The primary issue revolved around the registration with the RERA.
- All complaints stemmed from misunderstandings or conflicts regarding project compliance with regulatory authority, rather than construction quality or service delivery.
In terms of winning cases:
- Their victories point towards a robust legal defense that effectively articulates their compliance with necessary regulations.
- The consistent rejection of claims showcases a pattern of strong regulatory alignment and possibly effective communication regarding project registrations.
Conclusion
In summary, Silvercity Housing and Infrastructure Limited presents a compelling case for potential buyers. With stringent adherence to project registration and a spotless record in court, they seem to stand on solid ground. However, buyers should always conduct their due diligence, focusing especially on project registrations and compliance with local regulations.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Verify RERA Registration: Always check if the builder’s projects are registered with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority, as this could save you from future legal challenges.
- Assess Project History: Look into the builder’s history of completed projects and reviews. A strong background can provide an assurance of quality.
- Legal Clarity: Ensure to comprehend all contractual obligations and seek legal advice if necessary before making any purchases.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Research Reputation: Look for reviews and testimonials from past customers to gauge the builder’s reliability and quality of work.
- Transparency: Trustworthy builders will be transparent about project timelines, costs, and any potential challenges.
- Visit Completed Projects: Whenever possible, visiting previous projects can give you a direct assessment of the builder's work standards.
In light of the aforementioned factors, potential buyers may find comfort in Silvercity's proven track record and navigate their real estate investments confidently.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Silvercity Housing and Infrastructure Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The primary theme emerging from the cases filed is the dispute regarding project registration with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). All claims presented by the opposing parties centered around the argument that the project was not registered, thus seeking relief for perceived grievances. However, the builder consistently asserted that the project was indeed registered and under the jurisdiction of RERA, leading to the rejection of the complaints as not maintainable.
These cases highlight a pattern where aggrieved parties sought to contest penalties or claim delays based on misunderstandings of the regulatory framework governing real estate projects. Many complaints stemmed from the claimants' inability to confirm the project's registration status or awareness of the legal requirements necessary for a valid complaint. This misunderstanding resulted in multiple attempts to seek redressal through legal channels, which ultimately did not withstand scrutiny in court.
The common reasons for the builder winning these cases include the failure of the opposing party to provide sufficient evidence supporting their claims. In all instances, the complaints were dismissed due to the project's recognized registration with the regulatory body. Moreover, the builder effectively communicated the compliance with necessary legal and regulatory standards, often highlighting the opposing parties' misunderstandings of project classifications. This indicates that Silvercity Housing and Infrastructure Limited has a strong capacity to defend itself against accusations, underscoring a potentially favorable reputation in ensuring compliance and clarity.
This analysis reveals broader implications within the real estate market, suggesting that buyers may sometimes make accusations that are exaggerated or unfounded. Buyers must remain vigilant and informed about regulations and the operational status of projects in the real estate landscape. Such diligence is essential in preventing unnecessary legal battles that can arise from misinterpretations or misinformation. Finally, it is critical for potential buyers to approach claims with care, ensuring they have comprehensive and reliable information before drawing conclusions about a builder’s reputation. In an industry where misunderstandings can lead to significant disputes, builders like Silvercity Housing and Infrastructure Limited exemplify the ability to navigate such challenges effectively.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 and 7 of 2017 | Punjab | The complaints were rejected as not maintainable … | ["Project registrat… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellants claimed that … | Silver City Constru… | Silver City Housing… | https://rera.punjab.gov.in/rera/rwdataOrdersJudgements\2019\/complaint_5.pdf |