CIN | U70100HR2011PTC042130 |
---|---|
Year Established | 16-Feb-11 |
Address | 41, RANDHIR LANE, KARNAL HR 132001 IN |
Company Status | Private |
In the complex world of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for a smooth and satisfactory purchase experience. Here, we delve into Skyhigh Infraland Private Limited, exploring their performance through the lens of legal cases, buyer complaints, and project location.
Skyhigh Infraland Private Limited operates primarily in Haryana. Despite the promising name and potential offerings, the builder has faced several complaints.
Skyhigh Infraland has received a total of 4 complaints. The nature of these complaints is not detailed, but the fact remains indicative of some dissatisfaction among buyers.
Skyhigh Infraland Private Limited has lost 2 legal cases. Both cases were disposed of under similar circumstances:
This common outcome suggests significant operational issues, primarily surrounding liquidity, which potentially affects the delivery of projects and fulfillment of commitments to buyers.
In contrast, the builder has successfully resolved 2 legal cases in their favor. The details of these cases highlight a recurring issue:
The outcomes of these cases suggest that while there may be some successful resolutions in the face of external challenges, the underlying issues causing loan disbursement problems reflect poorly on the builder's operational effectiveness.
Overall, Skyhigh Infraland Private Limited showcases a mixed record amidst complaints and legal challenges. While the builder has had successes in court, the losses indicative of project liquidation can raise red flags for potential buyers.
In the end, informed decisions lead to better outcomes. Potential buyers should weigh Skyhigh Infraland's strengths and weaknesses carefully against their personal requirements and risk appetite.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RERA-PKL-1 16 of 20… | Haryana | Complainant booked a flat with respondent, but re… | ["Real Estate Dispu… | {"appellant_claim": "Respondent failed to provide… | another | Skyhigh Infraland P… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/NDU4Ng== |
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Skyhigh Infraland Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases primarily revolve around themes of project liquidation and the builder's defenses against various complaints. Both of the cases reviewed were disposed of on account of the project being under liquidation, which underscores a critical phase affecting ongoing projects.
The complaints were brought forward likely due to discontent among clients regarding project status and delivery timelines, but were ultimately attributed to the liquidation process, which can complicate the relationship between builders and buyers. This focus suggests that the underlying reasons for these complaints stemmed from delays and uncertainties inherent in a project facing financial or operational difficulties.
In both instances, the builder's successful defense came as a result of the complaints being tied directly to the liquidation status of the project, thereby making it clear that the claims were procedural rather than indicative of a failure on the builder's part. The verdicts indicate that the opposing parties could not substantiate their claims effectively within the context of the legal proceedings, a common theme in construction-related disputes where substantive evidence is crucial.
This analysis reveals much about Skyhigh Infraland Private Limited's reputation within the real estate market. It suggests that while the company may face its share of challenges, its ability to defend itself against claims points toward a certain resilience. Interestingly, it also highlights a broader narrative in the real estate sector: buyers sometimes issue complaints that stem from misunderstandings or dissatisfaction, particularly in complicated situations like project liquidations.
Thus, potential buyers are advised to approach claims and disputes with caution. It is essential for them to conduct thorough research and seek reliable information about builders before forming judgments about their integrity or reliability. While legitimate disputes certainly exist in the marketplace, this case analysis indicates that builders like Skyhigh Infraland Private Limited can effectively navigate legal challenges, thereby contending with accusations that may, at times, seem unjust. Hence, informed decision-making becomes paramount in the real estate arena.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
847 of 2019 | Haryana | Complaint against Skyhigh Infraland Pvt. Ltd. dis… | ["Project liquidati… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Others | Skyhigh Infraland P… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTA1NDA= |