builder logo

SKYLINE DEVELOPERS

  • No of Complaints: 3
  • States (Active in): Gujarat, Karnataka
CIN Not Available
Year Established Not Available
Address Not Available
Company Status Not Available

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate landscape, choosing the right developer is crucial for a hassle-free property investment. This blog post takes a closer look at Skyline Developers, a builder with projects in Gujarat and Karnataka. Here, we dive into their legal challenges, analyze patterns in their case history, and provide tips for potential buyers.

Skyline Developers: An Overview

Skyline Developers has faced 3 complaints in total, all of which have resulted in lost cases. While the builder operates in two Indian states, the presence of legal issues raises concerns about its credibility in fulfilling project commitments.

Legal Case Details

Cases Lost

The builder has lost all three cases filed against them. Common factors in these cases include:

  1. Failure to Provide Possession and Documentation: In multiple instances, complainants reported that the builder did not provide the possession of their units or necessary documents like the registered conveyance deed, despite having received full payments. This indicates a recurrent issue with delivery.
  2. Delays in Project Completion: Another pattern observed is the builder's inability to complete projects on time, leading to delays for the buyers. In all cases lost, the authority directed the builder to compensate the plaintiffs for these delays.
  3. Contested Claims Regarding Payments: The builder often contested claims citing reasons like the cancellation of bookings or unforeseen circumstances for project delays. However, the authorities ruled against them, indicating that their defenses were not sufficiently credible.

Cases Won

Despite the negative outcomes of the lost cases, there are insights gleaned from the cases won, where the builder had to fulfill some obligations, albeit not winning in the traditional sense:

  1. Regulatory Compliance Issues: While technically the builder prevailed in three cases (the outcomes directed them to execute documentation or pay compensation), the overall trend highlights consistent failures to meet buyers' expectations.
  2. The Direction of RERA Claims: In cases where compensation was ordered, the builder acknowledged the delays and was mandated by the authority to comply with regulations, suggesting that while they won technically, their operations are still heavily scrutinized by regulatory frameworks.

Conclusion

Overall Assessment

Skyline Developers has a troubling track record, marked by legal disputes and complaints leading to lost cases. Their frequent inability to provide possession and fulfill contractual obligations raises red flags for prospective buyers. While they may claim to uphold certain agreements, the authority's repeated rulings against them suggest a lack of reliability.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research Thoroughly: Before committing, ensure you look into the builder's project history and read customer reviews to gauge overall satisfaction.
  2. Seek Legal Advice: If considering a purchase from Skyline Developers, consulting a legal expert knowledgeable in RERA regulations may offer additional assurance on property rights.
  3. Demand Clear Documentation: Always insist on receiving all pertinent documents related to your purchase and ensure that the builder provides a timeline for project completion.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

  • Check Their Track Record: Look at previous projects and how they've handled client complaints.
  • Understand Your Rights under RERA: Familiarize yourself with your rights as a buyer under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, which provides protection for customers.
  • Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to evaluate the quality of construction and amenities offered.

In summary, buying a property is a significant investment, and understanding the implications of your choice, particularly with builders like Skyline Developers, can save you time, money, and undue stress.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Execute Conveyance Deed Compensation Disputes for Non-Completion of Projects Refund and Compensation Issues for Advance Payments

Analysis of the cases filed against Skyline Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects. The cases could be broadly categorized into four types: delayed possession claims, failure to execute conveyance deeds, compensation disputes for non-completion of projects, and refund and compensation issues for advance payments.

Many of the claims made by the complainants revolved around the builder's inability to provide timely possession of units or to fulfill their commitments regarding conveyance deeds. For instance, in one case, the complainant had paid the remaining amount for Unit No. D/75, yet the builder had not provided the registered conveyance deed or possession, leading the authority to direct the builder to take corrective action.

Many plaintiffs also sought compensation due to the builder's failure to complete projects on schedule. The builder often attributed these delays to unforeseen circumstances, but the authorities did not accept this defense, emphasizing the need for builders to adhere to timelines and clear communications with buyers. Accordingly, plaintiffs were often awarded compensation at a rate of 2% interest on their loans or advance payments.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder’s litigation often stems from a failure to meet contractual obligations, provide timely updates, or return funds on demand. Common triggers for these disputes include the builder's cancellation of bookings without valid reasons, non-compliance with the RERA Act, and inadequate transparency regarding project timelines and expectations.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of valid cancellations or project delays. Additionally, their failure to comply with legal requirements, such as executing conveyance deeds, and their inability to provide possession within a reasonable timeframe were critical factors in the authorities' decisions. Overall, these cases highlight the importance for builders to prioritize clear communication and adherence to regulatory frameworks to avoid disputes with buyers.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
CMP/170911/0000061 Karnataka The plaintiff filed a complaint against the devel… ["Delay Compensatio… {"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that t… Skyline Developers https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=406415
CMP/170909/0000057 Karnataka The plaintiff, RMALATHI, filed a complaint agains… ["Delay in possessi… {"appellant_claim": "The plaintiff claimed that t… Skyline Developers https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=406410
CMP/Ahmedabad/21102… Gujarat The complainant, Shri. Omprakash Kapildev Pandey,… ["Registered Convey… {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… Shri. Omprakash Kap… Skyline Developers https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1CHMFJgYNNLlUUyswCAgARt9Zoj6vYP43

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins