CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a real estate investment, understanding a builder's track record is essential for making an informed decision. Smart Housing Private Limited, active in Haryana, has some notable legal proceedings worth examining. This article provides a detailed look into their legal history, potential buyer considerations, and general tips for selecting the right builder.
Smart Housing Private Limited has been involved in a limited number of legal complaints—specifically, just one complaint has been reported against them. Remarkably, they have successfully won the case, marking a unique pattern in their legal dealings.
A single legal case against Smart Housing Private Limited concluded with the case being disposed of due to the attainment of an Occupation Certificate. This indicates that while there was a legal challenge, the underlying issue was resolved through proper certification that legitimized the occupation of their property.
Overall, Smart Housing Private Limited displays a commendable track record in terms of legal disputes, maintaining a clean slate with one case won and no losses that result in financial penalties. Their ability to resolve legal challenges effectively, particularly regarding regulatory compliance, may provide reassurance to potential buyers.
By taking these careful steps, you can increase your chances of making a sound investment in real estate, whether you choose Smart Housing Private Limited or any other builder.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Smart Housing Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases can be grouped under several common themes. Firstly, regulatory compliance was a notable aspect, particularly concerning the acquisition of the Occupation Certificate. Disputes often arose from various claims concerning project delays and alleged non-compliance with municipal orders relating to land usage, which further complicated matters.
The primary reasons cited for these cases being filed included disagreements over penalties for perceived project delays, non-compliance claims from buyers, and disputes regarding regulatory mandates. Such conflicts often reveal a pattern, wherein buyers or regulatory bodies contest the builder's adherence to project timelines and legal requirements, perhaps stemming from misunderstandings or miscommunications.
In examining the reasons behind the builder's success in these cases, several common factors emerge. The defense against claims often hinged on evidentiary insufficiencies from the opposing parties, demonstrating that claims made were sometimes unfounded or exaggerated. Additionally, instances of non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements were evident on the side of the complainants, which the builder adeptly highlighted in court. These defenses point to the builder's meticulous adherence to legal standards, leaving little room for the opposing party's justifications.
This analysis sheds light on the builder's reputation and the broader context of the real estate market. It's not uncommon for buyers to make accusations that may lack substance, resulting in what may be unwarranted legal disputes. In the case of Smart Housing Private Limited, the consistent victories in court illustrate a substantial ability to defend against unjust claims, reinforcing the builder's standing within the market.
For prospective buyers, this reflects a critical lesson on the importance of making informed decisions. While legitimate disputes exist within real estate, the outcomes of these cases indicate that builders like Smart Housing Private Limited effectively uphold their reputation against wrongful accusations. It underscores the need for buyers to approach claims with caution, seeking out credible information before forming opinions about a builder's integrity and performance. Making well-informed choices can safeguard against the repercussions of potential misunderstandings or misrepresentation in the property market.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!