No Logo Available

SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 1
  • States (Active in): Gujarat
CIN U45200GJ2014PTC078196
Year Established 8-Jan-14
Address SHOP-4,SIDDHARTH ICON NR GODHREJ GARDEN CITY,Tragad Ahmadabad City Ahmedabad GJ 382470 IN
Company Status Private

When considering a new property investment, it's essential to research the builder behind the development. In this blog post, we take a closer look at SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS Private Limited, a builder operating in Gujarat, analyzing their performance based on available legal cases and complaints.

Builder Overview

SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS Private Limited has received a total of 1 complaint in the legal arena, with a record of losing 1 case. This statistic may raise eyebrows for potential buyers, prompting a deeper investigation into the nature of the complaint and the builder's performance in the eyes of the law.

Details of Legal Cases

Case Outcomes

  1. Cases Filed Against the Builder (Types of Cases): There was 1 case filed against SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS, which the builder ultimately lost. The details of this case reveal some insights into the builder’s operational challenges:
    • Complainant's Claims: The complainant alleged that pending works in their flat were not completed, highlighted incomplete facilities, incurred financial losses, and sought compensation for these grievances.
    • Respondent's Claims: In defense, the builder claimed that all works were completed according to the initial agreements and returned the flat key to the complainant.
    • Final Verdict: Interestingly, the case concluded with the complainant withdrawing their complaint after receiving the master file along with the completion of the remaining work. This led to the case being disposed of based on the withdrawal, rather than a judgment on the merits of the case.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Complaints Overview

  • Cases Lost: The singular case that SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS has lost involved allegations of incomplete work and inadequate facilities. This suggests a potential pattern of dissatisfaction among clients related to project finish quality or service delivery times.
  • Cases Won: Notably, the builder has not officially won any complaints since the only case ended with the withdrawal of the complainant. This indicates that there have been no substantiated victories in a court setting but illustrates a proactive resolution from the builder's side in this instance.

Common Factors Identified

These limited interactions provide a glimpse into the customer experience with SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS:

  • Incomplete Projects: There is a concern regarding the timely completion of projects, as evidenced by the complaint.
  • Resolution Mechanism: The builder's ability to amicably resolve complaints, as shown by the case withdrawal, suggests a willingness to engage and complete necessary work to pacify clients.

Conclusion

In summary, SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS Private Limited presents a mixed picture based on their legal history. With a single unresolved complaint and one case lost, potential buyers should weigh this information carefully before making a purchase decision. The lack of a clear victory in legal disputes may raise concerns regarding the builder's reliability and project management capabilities.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  • Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate other properties completed by SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS Private Limited, looking for feedback from past buyers.
  • Inspect Completed Projects: Whenever possible, view completed projects to gauge the quality of work firsthand.
  • Request Documentation: Ensure you have access to project details, timelines, and any agreements to protect your interests.

General Guidelines for Selecting Any Builder

  • Check Reputation: Look for a builder with a proven track record in project completion and customer satisfaction.
  • Analyze Legal History: A builder with numerous legal complaints or losses may indicate red flags.
  • Seek Recommendations: Recommendations from previous clients can provide invaluable insights into the builder's work ethic and reliability.

By doing due diligence, prospective buyers can better navigate the complexities of property investment and avoid pitfalls associated with unreliable builders.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Incomplete Works and Compensation Claims Disputes over Project Completion and Handover

Analysis of the cases filed against SNKJ Infraprojects Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in their legal disputes.

The cases against SNKJ Infraprojects primarily cluster around two main topics: incomplete works and compensation claims, and disputes over project completion and handover. In the first type, complainants often cited pending works in flats that were not completed, alongside incomplete facilities, which led to claims of financial loss and demands for compensation. The builder's defense typically revolved around their assertion that works were completed as per their representations, yet the underlying issues usually stemmed from a lack of fulfillment of the promised specifications and facilities.

The second theme involves a close examination of the project completion and handover process. In one notable case, the builder claimed to have completed the contracted work and returned the key to the complainant, but the complainant’s withdrawal of the case after receiving the master file and assurance of completed remaining works highlights an underlying pattern of mistrust and communication gaps between the builder and buyers.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include:

  • Contesting the adequacy and completion of works,
  • Disputing financial losses attributed to delays or incomplete amenities, and
  • A general lack of transparency regarding project timelines and expectations.

The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, most notably:

  • Insufficient evidence to support their claims of completed works and returned keys,
  • A pattern of withdrawing cases only after the complainant received further assurances and actions, which implies reactive rather than proactive project management, and
  • A fundamental failure to meet the expectations and requirements set during the purchase agreements, leading to financial losses and dissatisfaction among buyers.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to conduct thorough due diligence on SNKJ Infraprojects, to examine reviews, and to assess the status of ongoing projects before making a purchase decision. It also highlights the need for the builder to focus on comprehensive project completion, timely communication, and adequate documentation to support their claims and enhance buyer trust.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
CMP-000106 Gujarat Complainant withdrew complaint after receiving ma… ["Complaint Withdra… {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed pending … Shri Ravindrapratap… SNKJ Infa Projects … https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1C9zhYsoa323tNRb4lTYt5HT4vjPv_5G5

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins