CIN | U45200GJ2014PTC078196 |
---|---|
Year Established | 8-Jan-14 |
Address | SHOP-4,SIDDHARTH ICON NR GODHREJ GARDEN CITY,Tragad Ahmadabad City Ahmedabad GJ 382470 IN |
Company Status | Private |
When considering a new property investment, it's essential to research the builder behind the development. In this blog post, we take a closer look at SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS Private Limited, a builder operating in Gujarat, analyzing their performance based on available legal cases and complaints.
SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS Private Limited has received a total of 1 complaint in the legal arena, with a record of losing 1 case. This statistic may raise eyebrows for potential buyers, prompting a deeper investigation into the nature of the complaint and the builder's performance in the eyes of the law.
These limited interactions provide a glimpse into the customer experience with SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS:
In summary, SNKJ INFRAPROJECTS Private Limited presents a mixed picture based on their legal history. With a single unresolved complaint and one case lost, potential buyers should weigh this information carefully before making a purchase decision. The lack of a clear victory in legal disputes may raise concerns regarding the builder's reliability and project management capabilities.
By doing due diligence, prospective buyers can better navigate the complexities of property investment and avoid pitfalls associated with unreliable builders.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against SNKJ Infraprojects Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key issues in their legal disputes.
The cases against SNKJ Infraprojects primarily cluster around two main topics: incomplete works and compensation claims, and disputes over project completion and handover. In the first type, complainants often cited pending works in flats that were not completed, alongside incomplete facilities, which led to claims of financial loss and demands for compensation. The builder's defense typically revolved around their assertion that works were completed as per their representations, yet the underlying issues usually stemmed from a lack of fulfillment of the promised specifications and facilities.
The second theme involves a close examination of the project completion and handover process. In one notable case, the builder claimed to have completed the contracted work and returned the key to the complainant, but the complainant’s withdrawal of the case after receiving the master file and assurance of completed remaining works highlights an underlying pattern of mistrust and communication gaps between the builder and buyers.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include:
The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, most notably:
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to conduct thorough due diligence on SNKJ Infraprojects, to examine reviews, and to assess the status of ongoing projects before making a purchase decision. It also highlights the need for the builder to focus on comprehensive project completion, timely communication, and adequate documentation to support their claims and enhance buyer trust.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP-000106 | Gujarat | Complainant withdrew complaint after receiving ma… | ["Complaint Withdra… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant claimed pending … | Shri Ravindrapratap… | SNKJ Infa Projects … | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1C9zhYsoa323tNRb4lTYt5HT4vjPv_5G5 |