
CIN | L45201KA1995PLC018475 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | SOBHA, Sarjapur-Marathahalli Outer Ring Road (ORR) Devarabisanahalli, Bellandur Post, Bangalore KA 560103 IN |
Company Status | Public |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
SOBHA LIMITED, a prominent builder in India, has made a significant mark in the real estate sector, primarily across various states including Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Haryana, and Kerala. However, like many builders, it faces its share of customer complaints and legal challenges. A detailed examination of the complaints against SOBHA LIMITED reveals patterns in the complaints and the outcomes of legal cases that provide insights into the company's operational practices and customer relations.
Builder Overview
- Name: SOBHA LIMITED
- Number of Complaints: 187
- Cases Won: 63
- Cases Lost: 124
Legal Case Patterns and Common Factors
Cases Lost by SOBHA LIMITED
SOBHA LIMITED lost a total of 124 cases, which prominently featured the following patterns:
- Delayed Possession Claims: Many complaints centered around delayed possession. Appellants often claimed that the builder failed to deliver their flats on time, resulting in financial hardship and demands for compensation. For instance, several cases involved requests …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by SOBHA LIMITED that resulted in losses provides valuable insights into the primary disputes and legal challenges faced by the builder. A deeper look reveals several key themes under which these cases can be categorized.
- Delayed Possession Claims: A recurring issue in the cases involves claims related to delayed possession. In these instances, respondents have sought compensation for the delayed delivery of their flats, citing significant delays that led to financial losses. The builder often faced penalties due to failure to adhere to agreed timelines, which resulted in monetary compensation being ordered by the tribunal.
- Refund and Booking Amount Disputes: Several cases centered around disputes regarding the refund of booking amounts or earnest money. Complainants alleged that the builder failed to return these amounts despite requests, while the builder claimed compliance with contract stipulations. Often, cases concluded with the …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SOBHA LIMITED, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes can be grouped into several key themes that highlight the primary areas of contention between SOBHA LIMITED and various respondents.
- Delayed Possession Claims: Several cases revolved around claims of delayed possession of residential units, where the builder contended that delays were not substantiated and that the allottees were not entitled to compensation. These cases often saw the builder effectively contesting penalties imposed due to claimed delays attributed to the developers.
- RERA Non-compliance: There were claims regarding the builder's failure to register projects under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and provide necessary facilities like water supply. However, the builder argued that the completion dates of the projects predated the act's enforcement.
- Disputes Over Compensation: The builder consistently defended against claims for …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against SOBHA LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes can be grouped under several common themes, reflecting the nature of complaints often raised by buyers and the outcomes in favor of the builder.
- Delayed Possession Claims: Several complaints revolved around the delays in completing and handing over properties, where the builder successfully defended itself by pointing out that possession was delivered within the stipulated timeframe, or that delays were due to the complainants' actions.
- Refund Disputes: Many cases involved requests for refunds of booking amounts, where the builder was able to demonstrate compliance with refund policies and settlement agreements. In many instances, the complaints were dismissed as the plaintiffs had either accepted refunds or withdrawn their cases.
- Non-Compliance Allegations: Allegations of non-compliance with municipal orders or promised amenities were common, yet the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!