SOHAM INFRASTRUCTURE

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder is essential for ensuring a smooth and satisfactory home purchasing experience. This post takes an in-depth look at Soham Infrastructure, a builder primarily operating in Gujarat. We delve into their legal track record, highlighting both the challenges faced by buyers and the outcomes of various legal disputes.

Legal Track Record of Soham Infrastructure

Soham Infrastructure has encountered a total of 12 complaints, resulting in 1 case won and 11 cases lost. This stark contrast raises questions about the builder's reliability and the quality of their projects.

Analysis of Complaints

Cases Lost

In the one significant case lost by Soham Infrastructure, the complainant accused the builder of failing to provide common facilities and delivering defective facilities. The builder defended itself, claiming to have reimbursed approximately Rs.41,83,000/- to the complainant as compensation for the alleged issues. However, the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Soham Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key pieces of information regarding their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: Defect and Quality Assurance Claims, Withdrawal and Refund Disputes, and Regulatory Compliance Issues.

The majority of the claims made against Soham Infrastructure revolve around Defect and Quality Assurance Claims. Numerous complainants cited various defects in the flats they purchased in the Lotus Residency project, such as humidity, water leakage, defective plaster, and the lack of iron rods in the windows. This highlights a significant concern regarding the builder's quality control measures and compliance with construction standards. The authority's decision to order the promoter to rectify the defects within a specified timeframe indicates a systemic issue that could impact the safety and satisfaction of homeowners.

Withdrawal and Refund Disputes constitute another frequent …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Soham Infrastructure, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The key themes that emerged from the summaries highlight recurring disputes that tend to revolve around common facilities and the services provided by the builder.

1. Disputes Over Common Facilities: This theme reflects the complaints made by the appellant regarding the absence or inadequacy of common facilities promised. In the analyzed case, the complainant alleged the builder did not provide necessary shared amenities, which is a common issue in residential complexes.
2. Claims of Defective Services: Buyers sometimes claim that the facilities provided by builders are defective or not up to standard. Such claims can arise from dissatisfaction with the quality of services, leading to legal disputes.
3. Financial Expenditure in Facilities Provision: In the case reviewed, the respondent builder presented evidence of significant financial contributions made …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis