| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a builder for your dream home, due diligence is paramount. This blog post evaluates Soham Procon, a builder currently operating in Gujarat, based on legal cases and complaints tied to their projects.
Legal Landscape of Soham Procon
Soham Procon has faced six complaints to date, and importantly, they have lost all six cases brought against them. This track record raises flags for potential homebuyers, making it essential to analyze the details behind these legal challenges and the broader implications for future projects.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
Across the six cases, the disputes primarily revolved around the Dev Solitaire project, indicating a specific focus on this development. The main points of contention involved:
- Appellant Claims: Complainants expressed dissatisfaction with the actions or quality of the builder regarding the Dev Solitaire project.
- Respondent Actions: In every instance, the builder claimed that the complainants did not provide adequate evidence …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Soham Procon, where the builder lost, revealed several key insights across all the cases. The disputes can be categorized into three main topics: disputes over project promotion, insufficient evidence claims, and communication obligations.
The majority of the cases revolve around the project promotion of the Dev Solitaire project. In these cases, the complainants expressed disputes with the promoter, indicating a significant level of dissatisfaction with the project's handling. However, the builder consistently claimed that the complainants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their allegations. This pattern suggests that one of the primary triggers for litigation in these cases was not necessarily the promotion itself, but rather the perceived lack of transparency or accountability that the complainants felt compelled to address through legal means.
The reason people commonly brought cases to court in this scenario was largely attributed to the complaints about …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!