| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When considering a builder for your dream home, due diligence is paramount. This blog post evaluates Soham Procon, a builder currently operating in Gujarat, based on legal cases and complaints tied to their projects.
Legal Landscape of Soham Procon
Soham Procon has faced six complaints to date, and importantly, they have lost all six cases brought against them. This track record raises flags for potential homebuyers, making it essential to analyze the details behind these legal challenges and the broader implications for future projects.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
Across the six cases, the disputes primarily revolved around the Dev Solitaire project, indicating a specific focus on this development. The main points of contention involved:
- Appellant Claims: Complainants expressed dissatisfaction with the actions or quality of the builder regarding the Dev Solitaire project.
- Respondent Actions: In every instance, the builder claimed that the complainants did not provide adequate evidence to substantiate their complaints.
- Final Verdict: The authority, in each case, simply ordered that both parties inform each other accordingly, rather than providing a decisive ruling in favor of the builder or the complainants. This suggests a lack of resolution in the complaints, leaving the grievances unresolved.
Patterns in Legal Cases
Lost Cases:
The consistent loss in all six cases against Soham Procon indicates several key factors:
- Repetitive Nature of Claims: All cases stemmed from disputes related to the same project, which could suggest systemic issues within the execution or marketing of the Dev Solitaire project.
- Insufficient Evidence: The repeated assertion that complainants failed to provide sufficient evidence raises questions about the clarity and documentation of agreements and expectations in their dealings with Soham Procon.
Won Cases:
Interestingly, while the builder has technically lost all cases brought against them, the nature of each case shows no successful defenses from the builder's perspective. Hence, the results indicate a pressing need for Soham Procon to address customer satisfaction and transparency in their operations to prevent further disputes.
Conclusion
The track record of Soham Procon presents potential risks for homebuyers. With a history of unresolved complaints, it is crucial for prospective buyers to tread carefully.
Tips for Potential Buyers:
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate the builder’s history beyond just one or two projects. Look into reviews and any legal matters associated with them.
- Seek Transparency: Ensure that all agreements are documented in detail and maintain copies of all correspondence with the builder.
- Ask About Disputes: Don't hesitate to inquire about any legal disputes and how the builder has resolved them.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder:
- Check Their Reputation: Look for feedback from previous clients and performance in the market.
- Verify Licenses and Certifications: Ensure the builder is licensed and conforms to local building regulations.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, tour previously completed projects to assess build quality and craftsmanship firsthand.
In summary, while Soham Procon has ventured into the constructing industry within Gujarat, the legal challenges they face are concerning. As a potential buyer, remain vigilant and informed to ensure your investment is secure.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Soham Procon, where the builder lost, revealed several key insights across all the cases. The disputes can be categorized into three main topics: disputes over project promotion, insufficient evidence claims, and communication obligations.
The majority of the cases revolve around the project promotion of the Dev Solitaire project. In these cases, the complainants expressed disputes with the promoter, indicating a significant level of dissatisfaction with the project's handling. However, the builder consistently claimed that the complainants failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their allegations. This pattern suggests that one of the primary triggers for litigation in these cases was not necessarily the promotion itself, but rather the perceived lack of transparency or accountability that the complainants felt compelled to address through legal means.
The reason people commonly brought cases to court in this scenario was largely attributed to the complaints about the project promotion. The builders' defense—that the claims were not substantiated with adequate evidence—indicates a defensive posture that might stem from an inability or unwillingness to meet the expectations set during the promotion phase. This disparity between promotion and delivery is a classic pattern in real estate disputes and typically leads to claims of misleading information or failure to achieve project timelines.
The conclusion of these cases with the authority ordering the parties to inform each other accordingly suggests a systemic issue with communication. It highlights the possibility that the builder's obligations to keep buyers informed about project details and timelines were not met adequately, resulting in disputes that could have been mitigated with clearer communication.
In summary, the builder's losses in these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence highlight a critical lesson for real estate builders. Proper documentation and transparency are essential when dealing with project promotions. Furthermore, understanding the obligations to maintain open lines of communication with buyers can help prevent similar disputes from escalating into legal battles.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/A/Online/Ahmeda… | Gujarat | The complainants have a dispute with the promoter… | ["Dispute with prom… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants have a disp… | Ajaykumar Krishnach… | Soham Procon | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1Pt6mE3sfEonuBOtGPGdeECM6JYnongoG |