Assessing Sohi Builders: Performance, Complaints, and Buyer Insights

When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home, due diligence is essential. One of the key players in the market is Sohi Builders, known for their projects primarily in Punjab. In this article, we will dive into the performance metrics of Sohi Builders, analyze complaints, and provide useful tips for potential homebuyers.

Performance Overview

Sohi Builders has recorded a total of 3 complaints. Remarkably, they have successfully won all 3 cases filed against them, showcasing a strong legal standing and effective management of complaints. With no cases lost, it indicates that Sohi Builders is proactive in addressing concerns and standing by the quality of their work.

Legal Case Details

To better understand the nature of complaints against Sohi Builders, let’s summarize the details of the cases that they faced:

• Case 1: The appellant sought permission to withdraw the appeal. The final verdict was that the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
• Case 2: The complainant argued that the project was not registered with RERA. The respondent claimed that the authority can proceed against unregistered projects, and the complaint was dismissed as withdrawn.
• Case 3: A complainant alleged that Sohi Builders failed to maintain essential services after the possession of the flat was granted in 2018. The builder contended that the complaint was frivolous, as possession had been granted and the Resident Welfare Association (RWA) was responsible for maintenance. This complaint was also dismissed as frivolous.

Analysis of Cases

Patterns in Cases Lost

Although Sohi Builders has not lost any cases, the complaints that were filed primarily stemmed from issues related to maintenance and regulatory registrations. Notably, most of the complaints were either withdrawn or characterized as frivolous, indicating a tendency for appellants to have incomplete grounds for their claims.

Patterns in Cases Won

The pattern of winning all cases suggests that Sohi Builders effectively countered claims by demonstrating compliance with regulations and the responsibilities of residents concerning maintenance. Their success can also be attributed to the builder’s readiness to engage with complaints and provide a strong defense when necessary.

Conclusion

Overall, Sohi Builders exhibits a strong legal performance with no lost cases, and their handling of complaints reflects a commitment to quality and customer service. However, it is essential for potential buyers to approach any builder with thorough research.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Research the Builder: Investigate their reputation and past projects.
• Check Legal Standing: Review any past complaints and the outcomes of those cases.
• Understand Project Registrations: Ensure the project is registered with RERA for better legal security.
• Consult Current Residents: Speak with those living in other buildings developed by the builder.
• Be Vocal About Concerns: If any issues arise during or after construction, don’t hesitate to address them with the builder promptly.

In conclusion, while Sohi Builders has demonstrated strong legal performance, potential buyers should always conduct personal due diligence, evaluate their options, and choose a builder with a stellar track record. Making informed decisions can safeguard your investment and ensure a smooth home-buying experience.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder Sohi Builders, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily revolved around three key themes: Withdrawal of Appeals, Frivolous Complaints, and Disputes Over Maintenance Responsibilities.

Regarding the Withdrawal of Appeals, it is clear that some complainants opted to withdraw their cases, indicating that they may have reconsidered the legitimacy of their claims.

In terms of Frivolous Complaints, one notable instance highlighted that a complainant argued the project was not registered with RERA; however, it was clarified that the authority could still take action against unregistered projects, leading to the complaint being dismissed.

Additionally, disputes over Maintenance Responsibilities showcased a scenario wherein a complainant alleged poor maintenance post-property possession. The builder effectively challenged this by indicating that the responsibility lay with the Resident Welfare Association (RWA) for the upkeep of common facilities, further supporting the dismissal of the complaint as frivolous.

These cases were brought to court primarily due to disagreements regarding the builder's obligations and the legitimacy of the complaints. Common reasons for these disputes included challenges regarding penalties, perceived non-compliance with maintenance standards, and misunderstandings regarding regulatory compliance, particularly concerning RERA registration.

Sohi Builders was able to effectively defend itself against these claims for various reasons. In many cases, the evidence presented by the opposing parties was insufficient, and the builder aptly highlighted the regulatory framework that allowed them to function as a legitimate entity, even for unregistered projects. Furthermore, claims regarding maintenance were met with appropriate evidence showing that the buyer's understanding of responsibility was misaligned with the actual contractual obligations that were executed at the time of possession.

The outcomes of these cases reflect positively on the builder's reputation, suggesting that Sohi Builders has a robust strategy for addressing and rebutting unjust claims. It is not uncommon for buyers to misinterpret their rights or the obligations of builders, leading to unnecessary legal disputes.

For potential buyers navigating the real estate market, this analysis serves as a cautionary reminder. While there are indeed legitimate grievances that arise in real estate transactions, it’s equally important to recognize that builders like Sohi Builders can successfully defend against unwarranted accusations. Therefore, prospective buyers should approach any claims against builders with due diligence and seek reliable information before drawing conclusions about a builder's reputation.