CIN | U70100MH2011PTC215548 |
---|---|
Year Established | 30-Mar-11 |
Address | S.D. ARCADE, PLOT NO. 39, OPP. PATNI SHOWROOM, BUTIBORI, NAGPUR Nagpur MH 441108 IN |
Company Status | Private |
When considering investments in real estate, potential buyers rely heavily on the reputation and reliability of builders. In this blog post, we will delve into the performance record of SPACELAND INFRA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh. With an analysis of legal disputes and outcomes, we aim to provide valuable insights for prospective buyers.
SPACELAND INFRA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED has faced a total of five legal complaints, all of which have been lost, indicating significant issues in fulfilling contractual obligations. The core of these complaints revolves around claims of incomplete development of plots and failure to deliver promised services, leading to dissatisfaction among buyers.
The builder faced multiple claims, although the records note zero successful defenses in favor of SPACELAND INFRA. Instead, the decisions were largely unfavorable, compelling the builder to make significant payments, including amounts with interest and additional sums for mental anguish.
The similarities in complaints tend to highlight systematic issues within the builder's operational frameworks rather than successful practices.
In summary, SPACELAND INFRA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED has a troubling track record regarding customer satisfaction and legal compliance. The builder's sequence of losing cases underscores serious concerns for potential buyers. If you're considering a property from SPACELAND INFRA, be prepared for the possibility of encountering issues related to non-completion and lack of communication.
As with any real estate investment, diligence and thorough analysis can guard against potential pitfalls, making it paramount to assess builders like SPACELAND INFRA carefully.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Spaceland Infra International Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into four themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Failure to Develop Properties, Compensation Disputes, and Refund Claims due to Incomplete Work. The majority of the claims were centered around the builder's inability to develop properties or complete construction work as per the agreements. Applicants frequently sought refunds due to the lack of progress on their residential plots, demonstrating a breach in contractual obligations by the builder.
A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's failure to fulfill their commitments, which invariably led to claims of delayed possession and inadequate development. Applicants often found themselves in disputes over compensation for mental agony and other expenses incurred due to the builder’s inactions. The builder, in their defense, would typically counterclaim that applicants did not adhere to payment schedules, which they alleged caused delays. However, the consistent failure to provide evidence supporting these claims or to meet contractual requirements ultimately led to legal losses.
The outcomes of these cases highlight a troubling pattern for the builder, as they were unable to secure a single victory. This raises concerns about their operational adherence to regulations, their reliability in completing projects on time, and their overall commitment to customer satisfaction. Common triggers for the builder's litigation losses include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to develop properties in a timely manner, and inability to compensate applicants as agreed upon in contracts.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Case Co. (4-- 00!-4… | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Mrs. N. Jose and Mr. Jose Edicheri… | ["Non-completion of… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Mr. Jose Edicheria | Spaceland Infa. Int… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/795339752991.pdf |
4- 70,-47-0422 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Mrs. Matilda George, filed a compl… | ["Non-completion of… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Mrs. Matilda George | Spaceland Infa. Int… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/843552245222.pdf |
4-0-47-0398 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicants, Smt. Neeta Panwar and Ramesh Sing… | ["Non-development o… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that … | Ramesh Singh Pawar | Spaceland Infa. Int… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/628353501106.pdf |