No Logo Available

SPACELAND INFRA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED

  • No of Complaints: 5
  • States (Active in): Madhya Pradesh
CIN U70100MH2011PTC215548
Year Established 30-Mar-11
Address S.D. ARCADE, PLOT NO. 39, OPP. PATNI SHOWROOM, BUTIBORI, NAGPUR Nagpur MH 441108 IN
Company Status Private

Introduction

When considering investments in real estate, potential buyers rely heavily on the reputation and reliability of builders. In this blog post, we will delve into the performance record of SPACELAND INFRA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder operating primarily in Madhya Pradesh. With an analysis of legal disputes and outcomes, we aim to provide valuable insights for prospective buyers.

Overview of Legal Disputes

SPACELAND INFRA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED has faced a total of five legal complaints, all of which have been lost, indicating significant issues in fulfilling contractual obligations. The core of these complaints revolves around claims of incomplete development of plots and failure to deliver promised services, leading to dissatisfaction among buyers.

Common Patterns in Lost Cases

  1. Failure to Complete Development: In all five cases, customers claimed that SPACELAND INFRA did not complete the development work as agreed upon in their contracts. This shows a persistent issue in meeting construction deadlines and project commitments.
  2. Compensation and Refunds: Buyers have sought refunds and compensation for mental anguish, which points towards not just unfulfilled contracts, but also that buyers experienced additional distress due to the lack of communication and accountability from the builder.
  3. Disputed Payments: The builder has consistently argued that buyers did not pay amounts due under the agreements. However, the adjudicating officer’s decisions suggest that the builder often bears responsibility for the incomplete projects and subsequent financial obligations.

Cases Won by the Builder

The builder faced multiple claims, although the records note zero successful defenses in favor of SPACELAND INFRA. Instead, the decisions were largely unfavorable, compelling the builder to make significant payments, including amounts with interest and additional sums for mental anguish.

The similarities in complaints tend to highlight systematic issues within the builder's operational frameworks rather than successful practices.

Conclusion

In summary, SPACELAND INFRA INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED has a troubling track record regarding customer satisfaction and legal compliance. The builder's sequence of losing cases underscores serious concerns for potential buyers. If you're considering a property from SPACELAND INFRA, be prepared for the possibility of encountering issues related to non-completion and lack of communication.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Do Your Research: Check the builder’s background, including their history of legal cases and customer reviews.
  2. Review Contracts Carefully: Ensure that all details are clearly outlined in contracts to protect against future disputes.
  3. Seek Legal Counsel: Before signing any agreement, it might be wise to consult a real estate attorney to clarify any ambiguous contract terms.
  4. Ask About Completion Guarantees: Inquire if the builder provides guarantees on timely completion and corresponding compensation in case of delays.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Look for Established Reputation: Builders with a long-standing positive reputation are more likely to meet project commitments.
  • Check Local Regulations: Ensure the builder complies with local laws and regulations concerning construction and real estate.
  • Engage with former clients: Speak to people who have previously worked with the builder to get firsthand accounts of their experiences.

As with any real estate investment, diligence and thorough analysis can guard against potential pitfalls, making it paramount to assess builders like SPACELAND INFRA carefully.

No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Develop Properties Compensation Disputes Refund Claims due to Incomplete Work

Analysis of the cases filed against Spaceland Infra International Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the recurring themes surrounding their disputes.

The cases can be broadly categorized into four themes: Delayed Possession Claims, Failure to Develop Properties, Compensation Disputes, and Refund Claims due to Incomplete Work. The majority of the claims were centered around the builder's inability to develop properties or complete construction work as per the agreements. Applicants frequently sought refunds due to the lack of progress on their residential plots, demonstrating a breach in contractual obligations by the builder.

A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's failure to fulfill their commitments, which invariably led to claims of delayed possession and inadequate development. Applicants often found themselves in disputes over compensation for mental agony and other expenses incurred due to the builder’s inactions. The builder, in their defense, would typically counterclaim that applicants did not adhere to payment schedules, which they alleged caused delays. However, the consistent failure to provide evidence supporting these claims or to meet contractual requirements ultimately led to legal losses.

The outcomes of these cases highlight a troubling pattern for the builder, as they were unable to secure a single victory. This raises concerns about their operational adherence to regulations, their reliability in completing projects on time, and their overall commitment to customer satisfaction. Common triggers for the builder's litigation losses include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to develop properties in a timely manner, and inability to compensate applicants as agreed upon in contracts.

This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.

Case Number State Summary Case Topic Detailed Summary Appellant Name Respondent Name Source
Case Co. (4-- 00!-4… Madhya Pradesh The applicant, Mrs. N. Jose and Mr. Jose Edicheri… ["Non-completion of… {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… Mr. Jose Edicheria Spaceland Infa. Int… https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/795339752991.pdf
4- 70,-47-0422 Madhya Pradesh The applicant, Mrs. Matilda George, filed a compl… ["Non-completion of… {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… Mrs. Matilda George Spaceland Infa. Int… https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/843552245222.pdf
4-0-47-0398 Madhya Pradesh The applicants, Smt. Neeta Panwar and Ramesh Sing… ["Non-development o… {"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that … Ramesh Singh Pawar Spaceland Infa. Int… https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/628353501106.pdf

Interested to buy from this builder?

Assured Callback in 5 mins