CIN | U45200MH2000PTC128004 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 3-A/B RAJA BAHADUR MANSION20 1ST FLOOR AMBALAL DOSHI MARG MUMBAI MH 400023 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the bustling real estate sector of Maharashtra, Spenta Builders Private Limited has made its mark, guiding numerous construction projects. However, a thorough examination of their legal track record reveals a range of experiences, particularly with complaints and litigation outcomes. In this post, we will delve into the builder's performance in legal matters, outcomes of cases, and provide insights for potential buyers.
Overview of Legal Performance
Total Complaints Received: 15 Cases Won: 11 Cases Lost: 4Spenta Builders has 15 recorded complaints against them, a significant number that underscores the challenges faced by the company in maintaining customer satisfaction and compliance with applicable regulations. Out of these, they have been notably successful in 11 cases while losing 4. This performance establishes a winning rate of approximately 73%, suggesting a generally favorable legal standing.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Cases Lost
Only one case has been filed by Spenta Builders that …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Spenta Builders Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two types: Document Production Claims and Delay Condensation Claims.
In the realm of Document Production Claims, the appellants consistently sought to produce documents that Spenta Builders contested as inadmissible. This points to a significant issue in the builder's transparency and compliance with information requests, which is critical in legal disputes, particularly in real estate where documentation often holds the key to resolving conflicts. The verdicts in these cases favored the appellants, indicating a legal recognition of the importance of document production in evidence-based litigation.
The Delay Condensation Claims primarily revolved around the builder's attempt to justify delays attributed to unforeseen circumstances. In one notable case, the builder sought condonation of the delay, which was granted, but this underscored an occasional pattern …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by Spenta Builders Private Limited which it lost revealed important insights into the builder's litigation patterns and the nature of disputes. The cases primarily fall into three common themes:
- Failure to Comply with Tribunal Directions: A recurrent theme across these cases was the builder's failure to adhere to the specific directives issued by the tribunal. This non-compliance seems to be a significant reason behind the dismissal of appeals, indicating a lack of seriousness or diligence in addressing legal expectations.
- Disputes Over Project Management: Another area of concern appears to be disputes related to project management, such as delays in possession or mismanagement of resources. While specific claims were not provided, the builder's tendency to litigate suggests frustration with the broader project environment, possibly attributing delays to third-party factors instead of internal processes.
- Challenges in Meeting Legal Requirements: …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Spenta Builders Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several recurring themes. First, there are instances of 'Delay in Filing Appeals', where the builder frequently sought to condone delays in filing appeals due to unforeseen circumstances or insufficient cause. Secondly, 'Claims of Cost Payments' are prominent, with the builder asserting that they had sent necessary payments, particularly the cost of Rs. 5000/- to the respondents, who either confirmed receipt or contested the claims. Lastly, there are cases surrounding 'Condonation of Delay', where the builder contested claims of intentional and deliberate delay by respondents. Finally, 'Disputes over Payment of Costs' highlight the ongoing contention regarding the timely payment and acknowledgment of the costs determined by the tribunal.
The builder commonly brought these cases to court primarily to contest actions or penalties imposed by …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from SPENTA BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.