CIN | U45201DL2002PLC118130 |
---|---|
Year Established | 20-Dec-02 |
Address | Unit No. 501-511, Fifth Floor Splendor Forum, Plot No. 3, Jasola District Centre New Delhi DL 110025 IN |
Company Status | Public |
When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home, due diligence is essential. This is especially true for Splendor Landbase Limited, a builder with a record that raises a few red flags. In this post, we will dive into their legal history, analyze their track record, and provide valuable insights for potential buyers.
Splendor Landbase Limited has been active in Haryana and has garnered a notable amount of complaints worthy of attention. They have faced 36 complaints, with only 3 cases won, and a staggering 33 cases lost. This record raises concerns about their reliability and customer satisfaction.
An analysis of the cases that Splendor Landbase Limited has lost reveals some common themes:
In contrast, the victories Splendor Landbase Limited has secured point towards a different narrative:
Based on the complaints and the legal outcomes, Splendor Landbase Limited struggles significantly with customer satisfaction. The high number of lost cases indicates serious systemic issues that potential buyers should be cautious of. There appear to be recurring problems with delays, transparency, and a lack of communication regarding changes to agreements or service offerings.
While purchasing from Splendor Landbase Limited can potentially lead to a satisfactory experience, numerous red flags should prompt potential buyers to tread cautiously. Sustained issues with delays and unfulfilled commitments highlight the importance of thorough vigilance in every step of the property acquisition process. Always prioritize your research and know what questions to ask before entering into any agreements.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3907-2019/1967-2021 | Haryana | The complainant sought refund of the amount paid … | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "The complainant claimed that… | Mr. Parveen Sharma | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTA5NjYz |
2350 of 2021 | Haryana | Complainants sought delay possession charges, exe… | ["Refund of paid-up… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainants claimed delay p… | Seema Rani Chabbra | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTY0NjY2 |
1837 of 2019 | Haryana | Complainant sought refund for unpaid amount, Auth… | ["Refund", "RERA"] | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought refund fo… | Anil Tuteja | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTI3NDc0 |
1459 of 2022 | Haryana | Complainants sought refund of amount deposited wi… | ["Delay in possessi… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainants claimed refund … | Prashant Mohan | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTQyNDMx |
Appeal No. 445 of 2… | Haryana | The appellant's appeal against the order of the H… | ["Real Estate", "Ap… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Mrs. Seema Rani Cha… | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTI5NjA0 |
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Splendor Landbase Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The case summaries highlight specific disputes that can be grouped under common themes. These themes include Delayed Possession Claims, Regulatory Compliance Issues, Disputes over Previous Rulings, and Financial Claims and Refunds.
In the realm of Delayed Possession Claims, we see instances where buyers sought refunds and compensation due to perceived delays in possession. Such disputes often stemmed from misunderstandings about regulatory processes and the timeliness of compliance on the builder's part. The Regulatory Compliance Issues theme encompasses allegations regarding adherence to municipal orders and filing irregularities, which can often lead to disagreements between builders and regulatory bodies.
Moreover, several disputes revolved around Disputes over Previous Rulings, where buyers contended that previous orders were unjust or improperly adjudicated. Lastly, Financial Claims and Refunds cover cases where buyers sought monetary compensation, typically for alleged shortcomings in the builder's performance.
The reasons for bringing these cases to court often include contesting imposed penalties related to project delays, claims from buyers regarding a lack of compliance with municipal regulations, or attempts to rectify perceived injustices from past rulings. Patterns that emerge point to a tendency by buyers to challenge builders on various fronts, sometimes leading to prolonged legal disputes over issues that may be inflated or misrepresented.
Examining the common grounds on which Splendor Landbase Limited won these cases, it becomes evident that factors such as insufficient evidence provided by complainants, failure to comply with legal protocols, and misunderstanding of regulations played crucial roles. The builder was frequently able to defend its actions effectively, demonstrating robustness in its compliance and operational transparency.
This analysis showcases the builder's reputation within the broader real estate market. It indicates that while there can be legitimate disputes within the industry, there also exists a risk of groundless accusations against builders like Splendor Landbase Limited. The consistent success in court points to the builder's capacity to handle unwarranted claims and legal challenges.
In conclusion, potential buyers must approach claims regarding builders with caution and diligence. While legitimate grievances do exist in the realm of real estate, the cases against Splendor Landbase Limited illustrate the importance of relying on verified information before forming judgments. It’s essential for buyers to conduct thorough research and engage reliable resources to make informed decisions regarding their investments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1543/2019 | Haryana | Complaint not maintainable as OC received before … | ["RERA", "Maintaina… | {"appellant_claim": "Complaint not provided in de… | Vimal Sachdeva | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTQxMTg= |
1977 of 2019 | Haryana | The respondent deposited the deficit registration… | ["Deficit registrat… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/Mjc3ODk= | |
1941 of 2023 | Haryana | Complainant seeks refund of Rs.1,00,000/- along-w… | ["Refund for delay"… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "Complainant seeks… | Munish Kumar | Splendor Landbase L… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MTc2MjMz |