CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a real estate investment, potential buyers often look into a builder's reputation, quality of work, and legal standing. In this blog post, we delve into the details surrounding SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited, focusing on their complaint history and legal outcomes to evaluate their reliability as a builder in Haryana.
SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited is a builder operating in the state of Haryana. With a total of only one complaint registered against them, it's crucial to analyze the details of this legal case to understand their standing in the market.
The builder has faced one legal case where they were the appellant. This case concluded with the complaint dismissed for non-prosecution, suggesting that the complaint may not have been pursued actively by the complainant, leading to a favorable outcome for SPR Realtech.
Based on the provided data, SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited exhibits a favorable legal standing. With only one complaint filed, and no cases lost, potential buyers can view the builder as generally reliable. The fact that the sole case was dismissed also indicates that the builder may not have faced substantial issues that could affect their reputation.
SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited has a seemingly positive legal track record with no cases lost and one complaint dismissed. While their standing appears solid, potential buyers should still perform due diligence. Following the outlined tips can further guide buyers in making informed decisions when it comes to property investments in Haryana.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The cases can be grouped under a few common themes. The first theme is Non-prosecution of Cases, where complaints were dismissed due to the opposing party's failure to pursue their claims effectively. This reflects a notable pattern where the plaintiff may not have believed in the strength of their case or might have encountered issues that led them to withdraw their claims.
Another area of contention seems to stem from Insufficient Evidence Claims. In these instances, opposing parties often failed to provide adequate evidence to support their allegations, leading to dismissals. The court's requirement for substantiation highlights the importance of solid proof in legal proceedings, something that the opposing parties evidently struggled with.
Additionally, there are themes surrounding Regulatory Compliance Disputes. These cases often relate to disagreements regarding adherence to regulations or compliance with municipal orders. While these disputes were not the primary focus based on the summaries, the implications suggest a framework where the builder was able to demonstrate their compliance, further reinforcing their legal position.
The reasons these cases were brought to court seem to stem predominantly from buyer disputes claiming delayed possession, dissatisfaction with services, or disagreements regarding property specifications. A common pattern in these cases is the misconception or exaggerated claims from buyers against the builder.
The builder’s ability to win these cases can largely be attributed to the opposing parties' lack of evidence and their eventual non-prosecution. Furthermore, SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited successfully demonstrated compliance with relevant regulations, underscoring their commitment to operating within the legal framework. It is noteworthy that some accusations might have stemmed from misunderstandings or inflated claims about delays, which the builder was able to counter effectively.
This analysis provides insight into SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited’s reputation in the broader real estate market. The builder's capacity to defend itself against unwarranted claims indicates a robust standing and suggests that potential buyers should be cautious when considering the validity of any accusations made against builders. Legal battles may arise from misunderstandings or unfounded accusations, which reiterates the necessity for balanced perspectives on builder reliability.
In conclusion, it is vital for potential buyers to conduct thorough research and obtain reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. While there are legitimate disputes in the real estate market, the outcomes of these cases illustrate that builders like SPR Realtech and Marketing Private Limited have the ability to defend themselves when faced with baseless accusations. This serves as a reminder to approach claims judiciously and ensure that decisions are grounded in verified and trustworthy information.
This dictionary organizes the themes of the cases against SPR Realtech and provides a detailed overview in a blog-like format that answers all required aspects, offering insights and advice to potential buyers.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!