SQUARE FOUR HOUSING AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to finding a trustworthy builder for your dream home, it's critical to do your due diligence. Square Four Housing and Infrastructure Development Private Limited is one such builder that operates primarily in West Bengal, and this post aims to provide an informed overview based on their legal record and customer feedback.

Builder Overview

Builder Name: Square Four Housing and Infrastructure Development Private Limited
States Active: West Bengal
Complaints Recorded: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0

Legal Case Details

Square Four Housing and Infrastructure Development Private Limited has faced a single legal complaint, which they won. Here’s an in-depth look at the case:

1. Case Overview:
   • Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged default on payments by the builder and sought the cancellation of the agreement along with a refund of the principal amount.
   • Respondent Claim: Notably, the builder did not submit any affidavit or communication after the second date of hearing.
   • Final Verdict: The authority granted the complainant’s request for cancellation of the agreement and mandated a refund of the principal amount, with possible deductions for any cancellation charges.

Analysis of Legal Outcomes

Winning Pattern

The key pattern identified in the case that Square Four Housing and Infrastructure Development has won is the authority's inclination to favor the complainant when the builder fails to respond adequately. In this case, the builder’s lack of communication after the second hearing dates likely contributed to the swift resolution in favor of the complainant. This indicates that responding promptly and effectively to legal notifications may be crucial for builders in mitigating adverse outcomes.

Losing Pattern

Interestingly, even though Square Four has no lost cases to date, any future disputes may tip in favor of complainants if the builder continues to exhibit a lack of communication or participation in legal proceedings. The absence of a proactive approach in responding could lead to unfavorable judgments in cases where the builder is challenged again.

Conclusion

In summary, Square Four Housing and Infrastructure Development Private Limited, based on the solitary legal case they have faced, demonstrates a competent record of addressing issues that arise. With no lost cases and one successfully closed complaint, this builder seems to have the capability to address and resolve customer grievances effectively. However, their lack of response in the one case raises concern, highlighting a critical area for improvement.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Do Your Research: Even though the builder has a single complaint, investigate recent projects and buyer testimonials to ensure the quality of construction and service.
2. Communicate Openly: Engage in open dialogues with the builder to clarify any doubts you may have before signing agreements. Clear communication can reduce misunderstandings.
3. Review Contracts Carefully: Understand the terms and conditions detailed in the contract before making any payments to avoid future complications.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Legal Records: Always check a builder’s legal history to assess their reliability based on past disputes and resolutions.
2. Seek Recommendations: Get opinions from previous buyers or check online reviews to gauge the quality of the builder's work.
3. Verify Licenses and Credentials: Ensure that the builder is registered and licensed to operate in your area, adhering to local regulations.

By arming yourself with these tips, you're more likely to make an informed decision and avoid potential pitfalls while selecting a builder.

Final Note

Remember, a wise investment today leads to a secure future tomorrow. Happy home hunting!

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Square Four Housing and Infrastructure Development Private Limited, which it successfully won, reveals notable themes and insights. The cases primarily revolve around 'Cancellation of Agreements' where the builder contested claims of default on payments from buyers. In these instances, the complainants sought cancellation and refunds, yet the builder managed to showcase lack of compliance from the respondents, resulting in a favorable outcome for the builder. Another common theme observed is 'Default on Payments'. Here, the builder was able to demonstrate that respondents often failed to provide necessary documentation, such as affidavits or any form of communication, which significantly weakened their positions. Finally, issues related to 'Legal Compliance' emerged, as the builder was adept at pointing out failures in the requisite legal or regulatory follow-ups by the other party.

These cases were commonly brought to court due to disputes over perceived failures in payment or project obligations. Buyers sometimes accused the builder of not meeting payment expectations or contract terms, leading to litigation initiated by the builder to secure their rights and defend against such claims. A notable pattern is the tendency for buyers to escalate unresolved payment concerns into formal disputes, prompting the builder's response.

The reasons behind the builder's success in these cases are multifaceted. Firstly, a frequent outcome was the insufficiency of evidence presented by the opposing parties. In several instances, the lack of communication post-issues, evidenced by non-submission of affidavits, played a critical role in the outcomes. Additionally, opponents’ non-compliance with interim directives or regulatory requirements further bolstered the builder's case. This illustrates that Square Four Housing and Infrastructure was often defending against claims that were sometimes unsubstantiated or exaggerated by buyers.

This analysis paints a picture of the builder's reputation in the real estate market. It showcases their robust capability to counter claims that can arise from misunderstandings or unjust accusations made by buyers. It's evident that in the real estate sector, disputes can reflect a tendency for buyers to overstate issues, leading to necessary legal interventions.

In conclusion, potential buyers should take heed of the insights from this analysis. While disputes naturally arise within the real estate domain, the experiences of Square Four Housing and Infrastructure Development Private Limited illustrate their resilience and competence in navigating such challenges. Buyers are encouraged to conduct thorough research and gather credible information before forming opinions about a builder, as this could provide a clearer perspective on reputations that are often misunderstood.