| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, choosing the right builder can be a challenging task for potential buyers. One builder that has recently come under scrutiny is SR INFRA, operating in Rajasthan. This blog post aims to provide an in-depth analysis of SR INFRA, examining its legal track record and offering insights for potential buyers.
Overview of SR INFRA
SR INFRA is a builder based in Rajasthan that has had minimal complaints lodged against it. With only one documented complaint and a single legal case lost, it has managed to keep its profile relatively low in terms of disputes. However, the implications of the legal outcomes merit a closer examination.
Legal Case Insights
Cases Filed Against SR INFRA
- Total Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
In this solitary case, SR INFRA was found at fault for not submitting Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) web portal. The specifics of the case reveal a warning from the authorities, where an additional penalty of Rs 5,000 for each missed QPR was imposed, and SR INFRA was directed to comply by filing the pending reports within 30 days. It is worth noting that the builder did not appear for the hearing or respond, which likely contributed to the loss of the case.
Patterns in Legal Outcomes
Common Factors in Lost Cases
The primary issue highlighted in the lost case against SR INFRA revolves around negligence in compliance with regulatory requirements. Failing to submit necessary documentation can lead to penalties and adversely affect the builder's reputation. The absence of a defense or any representation during the hearing further exacerbated the situation, indicating a lack of diligence and potentially impacting buyer trust.
Common Factors in Won Cases
While SR INFRA has not won any cases, the one case involved a lack of procedural compliance. This suggests that their legal strategy, or perhaps their operational approach to fulfilling regulatory obligations, needs significant improvement. It highlights a pattern of vulnerabilities rather than strengths in their legal handling.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while SR INFRA has experienced minimal complaints, the one significant case in which it lost raises pertinent questions about its operational diligence and commitment to regulatory compliance. The builder's current standing necessitates careful consideration from potential homebuyers.
Tips for Potential Buyers Considering SR INFRA
- Research Thoroughly: Familiarize yourself with any public records regarding complaints or legal cases against SR INFRA. Consider customer reviews and experiences to gauge the builder's reputation in the market.
- Verify Compliance: Ensure that SR INFRA is compliant with RERA guidelines. Understanding their track record in fulfilling such requirements could provide insights into their reliability.
- Request Documentation: Don’t hesitate to ask the builder for documentation of ongoing projects, which includes QPRs. This helps in assessing their transparency and reliability.
- Legal Advice: Consult with a legal expert familiar with real estate transactions, especially to review any contracts before signing.
General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Always verify the builder's credentials, including licenses and past projects.
- Look for Reviews: Seek out customer feedback through platforms that detail buyer experiences and complaints.
- Examine Completed Projects: Physically evaluate past projects to ascertain quality and adherence to promised specifications.
- Understand Payment Schedules: Clear understanding of the payment structure helps avoid financial disputes later on.
By following these guidelines, buyers can make informed decisions and choose builders that are not only reliable but also dedicated to maintaining regulatory standards. While SR INFRA has room for improvement, a thorough evaluation will empower buyers to navigate the complexities of home buying with confidence.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against SR INFRA that the builder lost reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: non-compliance with regulatory requirements, penalties for project delays, and failure to communicate or submit necessary documentation.
The first theme, non-compliance with regulatory requirements, stands out in the case where the builder failed to submit Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on the RERA web portal. This failure led to a show cause notice, emphasizing the importance of adhering to regulatory obligations in real estate projects.
The second theme, penalties for project delays, is closely linked to the first. Delays often arise from non-compliance, which in turn invites penalties from regulatory bodies. In the highlighted case, the builder faced an additional penalty of Rs 5,000 per QPR for the delay in submission, indicating a pattern where project delays lead to increased financial burdens, potentially straining the builder's resources.
The third theme, failure to communicate or submit documentation, is exemplified by the builder's lack of response during the legal proceedings. The builder did not file a reply or appear for the hearing, which reflects a broader issue of non-participation in critical legal processes. This lack of engagement typically results in default judgments against the builder, as seen in the case above where the builder was directed to file pending QPRs within 30 days, along with the imposition of penalties.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting penalties imposed for delays or non-compliance, and disputes over regulatory requirements. People may also disagree over the classification of projects or land, which can lead to legal actions. A consistent pattern observed is that the builder's litigation often stems from a failure to meet regulatory standards or fulfill documentation requirements.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and a failure to participate in the legal process. The cases highlight the importance of transparency, compliance, and active engagement in legal proceedings for builders in the real estate sector.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F.3(1311)2020 | Rajasthan | The respondent failed to submit Quarterly Progres… | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Suo Moto | SR Infra | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/8358F.3(1311).pdf |