| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
SREE DAKSHA INNOVATIONS has made its mark in the real estate sector of Tamil Nadu, but a closer examination of their legal track record reveals significant concerns. This blog post delves into the complaints against the builder, the outcomes of their legal cases, and offers insights for potential buyers.
Legal Case Overview
Complaints and Legal History
SREE DAKSHA INNOVATIONS has faced a total of 2 legal complaints resulting in losses in both cases. The primary issues raised by the complainants were related to excessive GST collection and the non-registration of sale deeds. These complaints enlist as follows:
- Excess GST Collection: Complainants argued that they were charged more GST than necessary.
- Non-Registration of Sale Deed: Delays in registering property documents were a major concern for the complainants.
Details of Cases Lost
Both cases resulted in losses for SREE DAKSHA INNOVATIONS. Analyzing these cases shows a repeating pattern:
- Common Complaints: In both instances, the complainants alleged that the builder charged excess GST and failed to register the sale deed in a timely manner.
- Overarching Justification by the Builder: The builder’s defense indicated that the GST discrepancies were attributed to the complainants' delayed payments, suggesting a complex relationship between payment timing and document registration.
The verdict in both cases directed the builder to only collect the actual GST paid and to ensure the registration of sale deeds upon receiving the remaining payment. This reveals possible operational inconsistencies related to billing practices and document finalization.
Cases Won
Despite having cases filed against them, it's essential to note that the builder has not secured any legal victories. This lack of success in court raises potential red flags for prospective buyers about the builder's compliance with legal norms and obligations.
Conclusion
Based on the provided data, SREE DAKSHA INNOVATIONS presents a concerning profile for potential buyers in Tamil Nadu. With two lost cases under their belt, both involving financial disputes and documentation issues, potential buyers should approach with caution. Here are some tips for those considering purchasing from this builder:
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Due Diligence: Before proceeding with any transactions, conduct thorough research on the builder's reputation, particularly their legal track record.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consulting with a legal expert can provide peace of mind regarding the implications of any agreements with the builder.
- Verify Documentation: Ensure all required documents are registered and that there is transparency concerning GST payments and other financial obligations.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reviews: Look for customer testimonials and reviews online to gauge the experiences of previous clients.
- Assess Transparency: A reputable builder should be open about pricing, project timelines, and documentation processes.
- Project Inspection: If possible, visit completed projects to evaluate the quality of the construction and fulfillment of buyer obligations.
Navigating the real estate market can be complex, and selecting the right builder is crucial to ensure a smooth and beneficial home-buying experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against SREE DAKSHA INNOVATIONS, which the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the complaints raised by the other parties. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: Excess GST Collection Disputes and Non-Registration of Sale Deed Claims.
In terms of Excess GST Collection Disputes, the cases often centered around the builder's collection of more GST than legally owed, which the complainants argued was unfair. The builder consistently attributed this excess collection to delayed payments from the complainants, suggesting that timely payments would have avoided the discrepancy. However, the authority did not accept this defense and directed the builder to collect only the actual GST paid, indicating a legal obligation to ensure accurate GST collection regardless of payment timelines.
The Non-Registration of Sale Deed Claims involved the builder's failure to register the sale deeds upon payment of the balance consideration. The complainants argued that this was essential for their legal ownership and security, while the builder claimed it would fulfill this step once full payment was received. The authority's verdict emphasized the importance of registering sale deeds promptly after payment, ensuring buyers' rights to their properties.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: common triggers for the builder's litigation include financial discrepancies related to GST and failure to complete legal documentation for property sales. People brought cases to court primarily to contest the builder’s financial actions and to secure their legal rights to property. The builder's losses in these cases highlight significant issues with compliance and communications that are critical in real estate transactions.
The builder lost these cases chiefly due to a combination of insufficient evidence to support their GST collection practices and non-compliance with the legal requirement to register sale deeds in a timely manner. These factors reflect a broader trend of neglecting regulatory obligations, which further undermines buyer trust and confidence in the builder's operations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C.No.79/2020 | Tamil Nadu | The complainants sought relief for excess GST col… | ["GST collection", … | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed exc… | Dr. Avudai Selvi | Sree Daksha Innovat… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2020/79-2020.pdf |