No Logo Available

SRI ANANTA MULTI SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Odisha
CINU51109OR2011PTC013075
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressPLOT NO. 737, JHARPADA NEAR U P SCHOOL, PO BUDHESWARI , BHUBANESWAR, Orissa, India - 751006
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When considering a property investment, potential buyers often look for reliable builders with a solid track record. Sri Ananta Multi Solutions Private Limited, a builder based in Odisha, is one such entity that requires careful scrutiny due to its recent legal disputes. In this blog post, we will analyze the builder's legal history, assess their reputation, and provide guidance for those contemplating a purchase.

Builder Overview

Name: Sri Ananta Multi Solutions Private Limited
State with Projects: Odisha
Number of Complaints: 2
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 2

Legal Case Details

Sri Ananta Multi Solutions Private Limited has been involved in two legal cases, both of which resulted in losses for the builder. The specifics of the appellant and respondent claims are not disclosed, but both cases were dismissed due to the default of the complainants, which indicates that neither case proceeded to a substantive hearing relevant to the merits of the claims against the builder.

Analysis of Legal Outcomes

Common Patterns in Lost Cases

The results of the two cases that Sri Ananta Multi Solutions faced share a significant commonality; both were dismissed for default of the complainant. This suggests:

  • Seriousness of Claims Not Addressed: It appears that the complainants did not follow through on their claims, which could weaken any adversarial reputation the builder might have faced had the cases proceeded.
  • Legal Vulnerability: The fact that there were no defenses or explanations provided by the builder in court could suggest a possible lack of engagement with the judicial process, perhaps due to insufficient evidence or a poor legal strategy from the complainant’s side, but it raises questions about the seriousness of their customer service or project delivery.

Patterns or Common Factors in Won Cases

Since Sri Ananta Multi Solutions has not won any cases, it’s important to note that there are no positive outcomes to analyze. This is a significant indicator for potential clients, hinting at a potential lack of robust performance on the legal front.

Conclusion: Overall Assessment of the Builder

Sri Ananta Multi Solutions Private Limited's legal history instills a sense of caution. With two cases lost and no wins, their current standing is concerning for potential buyers. Moreover, the dismissal of cases due to complainants’ defaults hints at a possible systemic issue, whether related to customer dissatisfaction or inadequate service offerings.

Tips for Potential Buyers

For individuals considering a purchase from Sri Ananta Multi Solutions, here are some recommendations:

  1. Diligent Research: Conduct thorough research on customer reviews, especially those relating to project completion, quality of construction, and customer service experiences.
  2. Seek References: If possible, connect with past clients of Sri Ananta Multi Solutions to gauge their experiences and satisfaction levels.
  3. Legal Advice: Consider consulting with a legal advisor who specializes in real estate to understand your rights as a buyer and the implications of the builder's legal history.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

When selecting any builder, keep these general tips in mind:

  • Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is registered and has the necessary licenses to operate within the state.
  • Check for Complaints: Look for complaints registered against the builder and how they were addressed, particularly if they have a history of legal disputes.
  • Quality of Work: Review past projects to do an in-person inspection if possible, to assess the quality of construction.
  • Project Timelines: Look for timelines of previous projects; ensure they have a history of completing projects on time.
  • Transparency: Opt for builders who are transparent in their dealings with clients and clearly communicate project plans, timelines, and costs.

In conclusion, while Sri Ananta Multi Solutions Private Limited may present opportunities, the lack of favorable legal outcomes warrants caution and thorough due diligence.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Default Dismissals Dispute Resolution Failures Claim Rejections due to Insufficient Evidence

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Sri Ananta Multi Solutions Private Limited, which it lost, revealed insights into the recurring issues and disputes faced by the company. The cases primarily fell under three common themes: Default Dismissals, Dispute Resolution Failures, and Claim Rejections due to Insufficient Evidence.

  1. Default Dismissals: A significant number of cases resulted in dismissal for default of the complainant. This suggests that a recurring theme in the builder's litigation was either the failure to present cases adequately in court, or an inability to meet procedural requirements. These dismissals indicate that the builder may not have taken sufficient action to move the cases forward, which could be reflective of either a lack of understanding of the judicial process or a strategic error.
  2. Dispute Resolution Failures: The builder appears to have engaged in litigation without resolving disputes through simpler mechanisms. This could imply a tendency to seek judicial redress rather than pursuing out-of-court settlements, potentially leading to increased costs and unsatisfactory outcomes. As the cases showed minimal engagement with the underlying disputes, it emphasizes the importance of effective communication and negotiation in the real estate sector.
  3. Claim Rejections due to Insufficient Evidence: Although the specifics of the claims were not provided, the dismissal of cases indicates a possible pattern of insufficient evidence being presented. The builder’s failure to substantiate its claims or counterclaims could have led to a lack of credibility in its arguments, making it difficult for the court to rule in its favor. This highlights the necessity for builders to gather comprehensive documentation and clear evidence to support their claims in court.

In summary, the common reasons that led to the builder's defeat in these cases include procedural defaults, a lack of proactive dispute resolution, and failures to provide sufficient evidence. These patterns suggest critical areas for improvement in the builder's operational and legal strategies, serving as a cautionary tale for potential buyers and stakeholders. It is paramount for investors to conduct thorough due diligence when engaging with builders, to ensure they are partnering with transparent and reliable companies.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review