No Logo Available

SRI RADHAKRISHNA GROUP PROJECT

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When selecting a builder for your dream home, understanding their track record and customer complaints can make all the difference. This post delves into the Sri Radhakrishna Group Project, a builder operating in Gujarat, examining their legal history and what it might mean for potential buyers.

Builder Overview

Name: Sri Radhakrishna Group Project
State of Operation: Gujarat
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1

Legal Case Details

The Sri Radhakrishna Group Project has faced legal challenges recently, with one notable case that highlights their practices:

  • Case Summary:
    Appellant Claim: The appellant accused the builder of violating the provisions of Section 11(2) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, which requires the disclosure of the RERA registration number and website in project advertisements.
    Respondent Claim: The builder argued that the violation was not intentional and was merely an oversight.
    Final Verdict: As a result, the authority imposed a fine of ₹20,000 on the builder for this violation.

Analysis of Cases

Patterns in Lost Cases

The case that the Sri Radhakrishna Group Project lost indicates a lack of adherence to regulatory standards, which can be critical when dealing with property transactions. This situation reflects a potential oversight in ensuring compliance with the legal requirements set forth by the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act.

  • Common Factors:
    Negligence in complying with statutory regulations
    Potential risks for buyers due to inadequate transparency

Patterns in Won Cases

In contrast, the details provided indicate that the builder has not won any cases; thus, we do not have any positive outcomes to analyze. This raises questions about the builder's operational practices and customer relationship management.

Conclusion

Assessing the Sri Radhakrishna Group Project reveals a builder with a concerning complaint history, marked by violations of regulatory laws. The legal challenges faced may indicate deeper issues regarding transparency and compliance.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research Thoroughly: Always investigate the builder's track record, legal disputes, and customer reviews.
  2. Check RERA Registration: Ensure that the builder is RERA registered and their projects comply with all relevant laws.
  3. Ask for Documentation: Request all necessary documentation related to the purchase and verify its authenticity.
  4. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to assess their quality and construction practices.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  • Evaluate Reputation: Seek recommendations and read reviews to gauge the builder's reputation.
  • Inspect Previous Work: Visit past projects to evaluate construction quality and design.
  • Understand Agreements: Ensure you clearly understand all agreements and contracts before signing.

By taking these precautions, potential buyers can make informed decisions when considering the Sri Radhakrishna Group Project or any other builder.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Violations of RERA Act

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Sri Radhakrishna Group Project, which it lost, revealed several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered in real estate transactions.

The cases highlight two primary themes: regulatory non-compliance and violations of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA Act). In the instance where the builder was fined, the violation consisted of failing to display the required RERA registration number and website address in project advertisements. This underscores a pattern where builders may face legal repercussions due to oversight or lack of adherence to regulatory standards.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance and regulatory violations. The builder's defense often revolves around claims of unintentional actions, as seen in the case where the builder asserted that the violation was not willful. However, the authority's decision in this case demonstrates that even if a violation is deemed an oversight, it can still result in fines, emphasizing the importance of diligence in complying with legal requirements.

The builder's losses in these cases primarily stem from their failure to meet regulatory standards. The RERA Act imposes specific obligations on builders to ensure transparency and accountability in their dealings, and violations of these obligations can lead to legal consequences. Hence, it is crucial for builders to familiarize themselves with the RERA Act's provisions and ensure consistent compliance to avoid legal disputes and penalties.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review