No Logo Available

SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the bustling real estate market of Gujarat, prospective homebuyers are always on the lookout for trustworthy builders. One such name is the SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM, which has established itself in the region. In this blog post, we will thoroughly analyze the performance of this builder based on their legal history and overall reputation, shedding light on what potential buyers can expect.

Builder Overview

Name: SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 1
Cases Lost: 0
States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Details

A notable aspect of SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM’s legal history involves a case that was filed against them regarding the sale of a flat. Here’s a summary of the case:

  • Appellant Claim: The appellant accused the builder of selling a flat without proper registration, alleging a violation of the RERA Act.
  • Respondent Claim: The builder contended that they had not engaged in any marketing or sales for the project in question, asserting they had not violated the RERA Act.
  • Final Verdict: The authority ruled in favor of the builder, concluding that there was no violation of the RERA Act, which affirmed their compliance with regulations.

Patterns in Legal Cases

  • Lost Cases: The builder does not have any lost cases against them since the only complaint resulted in a favorable verdict. This indicates an effective legal strategy and compliance with existing real estate regulations, reflecting their operational integrity and adherence to the law.
  • Won Cases: The single case that was won by the builder highlights their ability to defend against claims of unprofessional conduct and maintains a favorable standing in compliance matters under the RERA Act. This might suggest a proactive approach to addressing potential legal challenges that could arise in the future.

Conclusion

Drawing from the provided data, SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM emerges as a reliable choice for real estate investments in Gujarat. They have maintained a perfect record in terms of legal disputes and showcased their commitment to legality and ethical practices in their operations.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research the Builder’s Past Projects: Review previous projects completed by SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM to gauge quality and customer satisfaction.
  2. Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with the RERA Act to ensure your rights as a buyer are protected throughout the purchasing process.
  3. Inquire about Project Registration: Always check if the project is registered with RERA and whether the builder has up-to-date approvals.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

  1. Check Reviews and Ratings: Look for customer feedback and online reviews to assess the builder’s reputation.
  2. Verify Registration and Licensing: Ensure that the builder is registered and possesses the necessary licenses to operate in the region.
  3. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to evaluate the construction quality and service post-sale.
  4. Look for Transparency: A reliable builder should provide clear documentation and details about pricing, materials used, and timelines.

In summary, SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM has proven to be a competent builder in Gujarat, marked by their commitment to legality and customer satisfaction. Buyers considering their projects can proceed with a degree of confidence, supported by the builder’s favorable legal standing.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Sales and Marketing Disputes

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases can be grouped under a couple of common themes, primarily revolving around regulatory non-compliance and disputes related to sales and marketing practices.

One notable type of case involved claims of regulatory non-compliance, specifically allegations that the builder had sold flats without proper registration as per the RERA Act. On the other hand, there were disputes surrounding the builder's sales practices, where the builder contended that they did not engage in marketing or selling the project, thus mitigating any claims of wrongdoing.

The cases were typically brought to court for contesting penalties, as buyers or regulatory authorities often raised concerns over project registration processes and adherence to the RERA Act. A pattern emerges, indicating that some buyers may not fully understand the regulatory frameworks governing real estate transactions, leading to accusations that could be deemed unfounded.

The builder, in defending against these claims, often proved that sufficient evidence was lacking on the part of the opposing parties. Moreover, the builder demonstrated a clear understanding of the legal and regulatory frameworks and successfully argued that they had not engaged in unethical practices. This representation underlines a robust defense, showcasing that many claims made against them may arise from misunderstandings rather than factual inaccuracies.

This analysis sheds light on the builder’s reputation in the market. It underscores that while there are legitimate disputes within real estate transactions, there are also instances where grievances may be exaggerated or unfounded. SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM appears to have built a strong track record, effectively defending itself against claims that could potentially tarnish its reputation.

For potential buyers, this analysis carries a crucial message about the importance of making informed decisions in the real estate market. While grievances against builders can be genuine, cases like those involving SRI RAJ DEVELOPER PARTNERSHIP FIRM demonstrate that builders can be wrongfully accused. Buyers are advised to approach claims with caution and seek out reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's credibility.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review