| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the fast-paced realm of real estate, buyers often seek builders who are reliable, professional, and have a clean legal track record. One such builder is SRI SAI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, operating primarily in Karnataka. This blog post will delve into the legal proceedings involving this builder, shedding light on patterns observed in complaints, and providing critical assessment and tips for prospective buyers.
Overview of SRI SAI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS
SRI SAI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS is known for its project development in Karnataka, particularly the housing project 'SAI PRITHVI ELITE.' Although they have undertaken multiple projects, recent legal troubles have arisen which are vital for potential buyers to understand.
Legal Case Details
Upon reviewing the records, it is evident that SRI SAI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS has faced legal challenges, specifically two complaints that have been adjudicated against them. Here is a summary of the cases:
- First Case: The …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against SRI SAI BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their legal disputes, particularly surrounding their project 'SAI PRITHVI ELITE'. The cases highlight two recurring themes: delayed possession claims and refund disputes.
The delayed possession claims revolve around the builder's inability to deliver flats within the stipulated time, which led multiple complainants to seek refunds. The common reason for the claims was the failure to receive possession of the property on time, resulting in dissatisfaction among potential homeowners. Instead of addressing these grievances adequately, the builder responded inadequately, leading to legal consequences.
The refund disputes emerged directly from the delayed possession issues. Complainants sought to recover the amounts they had paid for their respective flats, citing the builder’s failure to fulfill their commitments. In each case, the builder's defense was weak; they either contested the entitlement to refunds without solid reasoning …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!