No Logo Available

SRIMATHI SUNDARAVALLI MEMORIAL NAGAR FLAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION

5.0/5 (12 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing a builder is a significant decision influenced by various factors including reputation, legal standing, and customer satisfaction. One such entity making waves in Tamil Nadu is the Srimathi Sundaravalli Memorial Nagar Flat Owners Association. This blog post delves into their track record in handling complaints, the outcomes of legal cases, and what potential buyers should keep in mind when considering this builder.

Overview of the Builder

The Srimathi Sundaravalli Memorial Nagar Flat Owners Association has established itself as a reliable builder with a solid standing in Tamil Nadu. They have faced 12 complaints, all of which resulted in favorable outcomes for the complainants. Remarkably, the association has never lost a case, amassing a perfect record with 12 cases won and 0 cases lost.

Legal Case Insights

Common Factors in the Cases Won

The cases that the builder has won seem to reflect a consistent theme. In each instance, the complainants accused the builder of:

  • Delayed possession of flats
  • Failure to deliver promised amenities
  • Non-compliance with the construction agreement

In their response, the builder typically argued that the delays were a result of the complainants’ late payments and maintained that the project was completed as per the initial agreements. Despite these claims, the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA) ruled in favor of the complainants, directing the builder to:

  • Register their project
  • Complete all pending works
  • Provide the promised amenities

This repetition of outcomes highlights the authority's commitment to enforcing compliance in the real estate sector, showcasing a robust judicial framework designed to protect buyers.

Common Factors in Cases Lost (Non-existent)

Interestingly, there are no recorded cases lost by the association. This unblemished record reinforces their reputation as a builder committed to resolving complaints effectively and adhering to regulatory standards.

Conclusion

The Srimathi Sundaravalli Memorial Nagar Flat Owners Association demonstrates a strong capability in navigating legal disputes, offering a reassuring prospect to potential buyers in Tamil Nadu. Their commitment to fulfilling promises, even in the face of complaints, indicates a builder focused on customer satisfaction and adherence to legal requirements.

Tips for Potential Buyers

If you're considering purchasing from the Srimathi Sundaravalli Memorial Nagar Flat Owners Association, keep these tips in mind:

  1. Do Your Research: Familiarize yourself with their completed projects and read reviews from current residents.
  2. Seek Clarification: Always ask about the timelines for possession and the amenities promised before making a decision.
  3. Stay Updated: Keep abreast of any ongoing legal cases or regulatory directives related to the builder.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

When looking to purchase property from any builder, consider the following:

  • Check Their Track Record: Investigate previous projects and outcomes of any disputes involving the builder.
  • Consult with Existing Residents: Speak to current residents about their experiences to gauge satisfaction and any unresolved issues.
  • Understand Your Rights: Be well-informed about your rights as a buyer under local real estate regulations.

In conclusion, the Srimathi Sundaravalli Memorial Nagar Flat Owners Association not only holds a commendable record in customer satisfaction but also underscores the importance of accountability in the real estate sector. By making informed choices, buyers can navigate their property purchase with confidence.

Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Construction Agreements Disputes over Payment Delays Penalties for Non-compliance with Regulatory Directives

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily centered around several recurring themes, highlighting key disputes the builder faced.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: Many cases presented by the builder involved allegations from complainants regarding the delays in the handing over of flats. The builder contended that these delays were often due to the complainants' failure to make timely payments, rather than any fault of its own.
  2. Non-compliance with Construction Agreements: Numerous disputations arose from claims that the builder had not adhered to the construction agreement stipulating amenities and project timelines. However, the builder effectively countered these claims by demonstrating compliance with the terms of the agreement, often showing that the delays were, in fact, caused by the buyers' actions.
  3. Disputes over Payment Delays: A notable pattern emerges where the builder faced accusations of failure to deliver services as promised. In these instances, it successfully argued that payment delays from the buyers were the primary reason for the project disruptions.
  4. Penalties for Non-compliance with Regulatory Directives: The builder was also involved in cases where penalties were imposed for alleged failures to comply with directions from authorities. The builder successfully managed to mitigate these penalties by demonstrating that it had fulfilled its obligations regarding the project.

Throughout these cases, the builder often brought matters to court contesting penalties and disputing accusations of delays attributed to other parties. The common triggers for the builder’s litigation were the perceived unjust accusations from complainants and misunderstandings surrounding timeline and amenity compliance.

The builder's success in these legal battles can be attributed to key factors such as the insufficiency of evidence from the opposing parties, non-compliance with legal formalities by the complainants, and a lack of due diligence in following interim directions issued by authorities. Importantly, these ongoing disputes indicate that buyers often make claims that may not fully align with reality, leading to lengthy and costly legal battles.

This analysis provides a glimpse into the builder’s reputation within the real estate market. The ability of Srimathi Sundaravalli Memorial Nagar Flat Owners Association to navigate these disputes and emerge victorious against potentially exaggerated claims reflects a robust defensive strategy. It can lead to a perception that the builder is well-equipped to handle accusations and comply with regulatory standards, reinforcing its credibility.

In conclusion, potential buyers should approach claims carefully and do thorough research before forming opinions about a builder’s reputation. While the real estate market does feature genuine disputes, this analysis serves to show that builders like Srimathi Sundaravalli Memorial Nagar Flat Owners Association can successfully defend themselves against unwarranted accusations. It is crucial for buyers to seek reliable information and understand the context of any allegations made.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review