SRISHTI SRIJAN

Introduction

When it comes to selecting a builder for your dream home or investment property, understanding their history and reputation is essential. In this post, we analyze the performance of the builder Srishti Srijan, based on legal complaints and case outcomes. This information is crucial for potential buyers who are considering engaging with their services.

Builder Overview

Name: Srishti Srijan
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Chhattisgarh

Legal Case Details

Srishti Srijan has a legal history that includes one complaint. Interestingly, they have not won any cases but rather lost the only case presented to them. Here's a brief summary of the case outcomes:

• Cases Filed Against the Builder Where the Builder Won: 1
  - Final Verdict: The non-applicant has complied with the order dated 29.0.2024 passed by the Authority.

Analysis of Case Patterns

Cases Lost

• Common Factors: Srishti Srijan's single lost case indicates a potential concern in their legal compliance or customer satisfaction—two critical factors to consider when evaluating a builder. The absence of any won cases suggests that the builder may struggle to defend itself or address issues raised by clients effectively.

Cases Won

• Common Factors: The outcome of their won case, which was compliance with an authority's order, suggests that Srishti Srijan may be capable of rectifying issues when required by regulatory bodies. However, compliance in response to a legal order does not necessarily indicate an overall commitment to quality or customer service.

Conclusion

Overall, Srishti Srijan's performance as a builder raises questions for potential buyers. With no cases won and a single case lost, buyers should proceed with caution. This track record might suggest underlying issues that could be important to address before deciding to invest in their projects.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Look into the builder’s reputation, reviews, and legal history. Buyer experiences can provide valuable insights.
2. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit properties completed by Srishti Srijan. This will give you a tangible sense of their quality of work.
3. Consult Legal Professionals: Before signing any contracts, consider consulting with a legal expert to understand the implications and advice on potential red flags.
4. Demand Transparency: Ensure that all project details, including timelines, materials, and costs, are transparently communicated and documented.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Check Licensing and Certifications: Ensure that the builder holds the necessary licenses and meets local regulations.
2. Ask for References: Speak to previous customers to gauge their satisfaction with the builder’s services.
3. Understand the Warranty: Look into warranty offers on both construction and materials, ensuring you understand what is covered.
4. Clarify Payment Terms: Be clear on the payment schedule and avoid builders who demand large upfront deposits without proper assurances.

In summary, while Srishti Srijan has a limited track record marked by one lost case and a compliance ruling, potential buyers should conduct thorough due diligence to mitigate risks when engaging with this builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against the builder Srishti Srijan, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: compliance with authority orders, project delay disputes, and regulatory non-compliance.

The first theme, compliance with authority orders, is highlighted by the builder's failure to adhere to the rulings made by the governing bodies overseeing construction projects. In one notable case, the builder was found to have complied with an order, indicating that there may have been previous concerns regarding their adherence to regulatory requirements.

Project delay disputes constitute another significant theme in these cases. While specific details of the claims have not been provided, it is important to note that project delays are a common source of friction in real estate transactions. Builders may face penalties for failing to complete projects on time, and customers may dispute delays attributed to builders when other factors could be at play.

The third theme, regulatory non-compliance, encompasses a range of potential issues, including building code violations, zoning discrepancies, and failures to secure necessary permits. This theme is closely tied to the first, as non-compliance often leads to legal challenges from authorities and dissatisfaction among buyers.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for delays, disputing project timelines, and disagreements over regulatory requirements. Buyers may feel aggrieved if they believe a builder has unnecessarily delayed their project, while builders might argue that external factors beyond their control caused the delays.

The builder’s losses in these cases likely stem from several factors, such as insufficient evidence to support their claims, a history of non-compliance with legal or regulatory frameworks, or a failure to follow interim directions from authorities. Misunderstandings of project classification rules could also lead to significant legal challenges.

In conclusion, the cases against Srishti Srijan reflect broader trends in real estate litigation. Builders must be vigilant in complying with orders, meeting project timelines, and adhering to regulations to avoid legal disputes. Buyers should also be aware of their rights and the common triggers for disputes, allowing them to make informed decisions when engaging with builders.