CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home, it’s essential to assess their track record, legal standings, and customer satisfaction levels. In this post, we take a closer look at SRK Developers, a player in the Karnataka real estate market, to understand their performance based on existing legal cases and complaints.
SRK Developers operates primarily in Karnataka and has garnered a mixed legal profile with regards to customer complaints. Notably, they have a record of one complaint filed against them, which leads us to investigate the details of their legal history.
This shows a complete lack of successful outcomes for SRK Developers in any legal proceedings.
There are no winning cases for SRK Developers to analyze further. The absence of any successfully contested cases indicates a potential concern regarding their legal standing.
The primary factor emerging from the lost case is linked to the absence of the complainant during the hearings, leading to a dismissal. This raises questions about the communication and support provided by the builder once issues arise with their projects. Potential buyers should reflect on how proactive SRK Developers are in addressing client concerns before they escalate into legal disputes.
In summary, SRK Developers has a concerning legal history with no successful defenses against complaints. This could suggest potential challenges in customer service or project delivery. For potential buyers, it’s crucial to exercise due diligence when considering this builder for future projects.
By considering these factors, you'll be better equipped to make an informed decision about whether to proceed with SRK Developers or another builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against M/S SRK Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key pieces of information across the board. The cases highlight ongoing disputes primarily centered around compensation claims and project delays, particularly concerning the 'SRI SAI RESIDENCY' project.
The first theme, Compensation and Interest Claims, encompasses the majority of the complaints filed by the complainants. In these cases, the complainants sought relief in the form of compensation and interest against the builder, indicating a significant level of dissatisfaction with the builder's performance, often related to delays or failures in delivering promised residential units.
The second theme, Project Delays and Non-Possession, is closely related to the first and deals specifically with the builder's inability to provide possession of properties on time. This is a recurrent issue in real estate disputes and typically triggers claims for compensation, as buyers expect timely possession of their investments.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting the builder’s failure to adhere to promised timelines and seeking redress for the emotional and financial strain caused by delays. Buyers may also dispute the builder's claims of responsible management of the projects or contest penalties imposed for delays attributed to other parties.
Notably, the case summarized above was dismissed for non-prosecution, highlighting an additional pattern where complainants may lack the necessary resources or willpower to see their claims through to fruition, which can be a significant factor in the builder’s litigation outcomes.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, including insufficient evidence to defend their position, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements governing real estate projects, and a lack of clear communication regarding project timelines and expectations.
In conclusion, the analysis of M/S SRK Developers' cases underscores the importance of transparency, adherence to timelines, and clear communication in the real estate sector. Buyers should be vigilant and thoroughly investigate a builder's reputation and past performance before making any investments.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP/UR/211118/00085… | Karnataka | Complaint filed against M/S SRK Developers for re… | ["Non-prosecution",… | {"appellant_claim": "Complainant sought relief fo… | Sankeerthana Vadluri | SRK Developers | https://rera.karnataka.gov.in/reraDocument?DOC=3681569 |