No Logo Available

S.S. A PARTNERSHIP FIRM

5.0/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

When evaluating potential builders for a property purchase, understanding their legal history is crucial. Today, we delve into the legal circumstances surrounding S.S. A Partnership Firm, a builder operating in Gujarat. We will examine their complaint history, legal outcomes, and what potential buyers should know before considering a purchase.

Overview of S.S. A Partnership Firm

S.S. A Partnership Firm is a builder registered in Gujarat. Despite having one complaint filed against them, they have managed to win that case, establishing a record with no losses.

Legal Case Details

Complaints and Legal Outcomes

  • Number of Complaints: 1
  • Cases Won: 1
  • Cases Lost: 0

Summary of the Legal Case

The only legal case filed against S.S. A Partnership Firm involved allegations of fraud from a complainant claiming that the builder had registered a project on land that belonged to the complainant's family. In response, the builder contended that they had legally acquired the land through a registered sale deed, and the complainant's family had sold the land back in 1982.

The RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) Authority ultimately dismissed the complaint, ruling in favor of S.S. A Partnership Firm by confirming that the transaction was valid as per the records. This ruling highlights the importance of having clear documentation and verified ownership when it comes to property transactions.

Case Analysis

Patterns in Cases Lost

As of now, S.S. A Partnership Firm has not lost any cases. Therefore, we cannot identify patterns or factors related to lost cases. The absence of losses suggests robust legal standing and practices in the builder’s operations.

Patterns in Cases Won

The single case that S.S. A Partnership Firm has won showcases a vital aspect of property transactions: the importance of documented proof of land ownership. The builder's ability to present a registered sale deed as evidence played a crucial role in their victory in this dispute.

Conclusion

Overall, S.S. A Partnership Firm demonstrates a positive legal track record with one successful resolution in their favor and no losses. For potential buyers, this suggests a level of reliability when engaging with this builder. However, it’s crucial to remain vigilant regardless of past performance and conduct thorough due diligence on any builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Verify Ownership: Always check the land ownership documents and ensure that the builder has a clear title to the property.
  2. Review Past Projects: Investigate the builder’s previous projects to assess quality and customer satisfaction.
  3. Understand Legal Framework: Familiarize yourself with real estate regulations such as RERA to better understand your rights as a buyer.
  4. Consult Legal Experts: When in doubt, always take advice from legal professionals when dealing with property transactions.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Research Reputation: Look for reviews and testimonials from previous customers.
  • Check Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to face project delays or quality issues.
  • Visit Existing Projects: Whenever possible, visit completed projects to assess quality firsthand.
  • Seek Transparency: Choose builders who are transparent about costs, timelines, and contractual obligations.

By following these tips and remaining informed about the builder’s legal standing, potential buyers can make more confident decisions in the complex world of real estate.

This review of S.S. A Partnership Firm serves as an essential reminder of the importance of detailed inquiry before concluding any property transaction.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Land Ownership Disputes Fraud Allegations Legal Compliance and Regulatory Issues

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, S.S. A partnership firm, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The common themes that emerged from the summaries highlight key areas of contention between buyers or complainants and the builder. These include:

  1. Land Ownership Disputes: In these cases, allegations were made regarding the ownership of land on which a project was built. A notable example involves a claim that the land was fraudulently registered by the builder, being claimed as belonging to the complainant's family. However, the builder successfully demonstrated that the land was purchased through a registered sale deed from the rightful owners.
  2. Fraud Allegations: Complainants had claimed that the builder had engaged in fraudulent activities. This category typically indicates a serious questioning of morality and honesty in dealings, although the builder effectively disproved these allegations by presenting valid documentation of land purchases.
  3. Legal Compliance and Regulatory Issues: Regulatory compliance issues often arise in the real estate sector. The builder managed to fend off accusations of failing to meet regulatory standards by showcasing compliance with all necessary legal requirements.

The reasons behind these cases being brought to court commonly revolve around contestations over ownership rights, claims of fraud, and concerns about regulatory compliance. Many buyers or stakeholders seem to misunderstand the complexities involved in land acquisition and project regulations, leading to disputes.

The builder's success in these cases can be attributed to several key factors. Primarily, the opposing parties often failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. Additionally, there appears to have been a lack of clarity regarding legal or regulatory requirements from the complainants’ side. This suggests a potential misunderstanding or lack of due diligence on their part, which was successfully countered by the builder's legal team.

From this analysis, it is clear that S.S. A partnership firm has a strong track record of effectively defending itself against unjust claims, which highlights an aspect of builders' reputations that is sometimes overlooked. Buyers must recognize that while legitimate grievances exist within the real estate market, not all claims hold merit. Erroneous assumptions or lack of information can lead to unwarranted legal battles.

For potential buyers, the message is clear: making informed, educated decisions is crucial. While there may be valid reasons for dispute in the real estate landscape, the cases examined here illustrate that builders like S.S. A partnership firm often have established protocols and documentation that can defend against baseless accusations. It’s vital to approach claims with discretion and seek out reliable information before forming conclusions about a builder’s credibility in the market.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review