| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When it comes to choosing a builder for your next property investment, understanding the builder’s track record can play a significant role in your decision-making process. In this blog post, we will explore the profile of SS GROUP PRIVATE LIMITED, a builder operating in Haryana, along with an assessment of their legal standing based on recent complaint data and court cases.
Overview of SS GROUP PRIVATE LIMITED
SS GROUP PRIVATE LIMITED is a real estate builder with projects located in the state of Haryana. They have handled a total of 1 complaint, which has resulted in one lost case and no cases won. This specific legal track record provides potential buyers with insight into the builder's operational practices and reliability.
Legal Case Details
Summary of the Case Against SS GROUP PRIVATE LIMITED
The single case filed against the builder involved a complaint from a customer regarding the delay in …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against SS Group Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The primary types of cases can be grouped into delayed possession claims, settlement disputes, and interest liability arguments.
Many of the claims made against the builder revolved around delays in possession, leading to dissatisfaction among buyers who expected timely completion of their properties. Buyers commonly contested penalties imposed for these delays and disputed the builder's attributions of blame to other parties for the stagnation in project progress. The builder's failure to meet promised deadlines created a significant trust gap, leading to multiple litigation cases.
A pattern emerges where the builder frequently cited previous settlements as a defense, indicating a potential misunderstanding or miscommunication about the finality of these agreements. The adjudicating body, however, did not accept this defense, suggesting that the builder may not have fulfilled their obligations even …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!