| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding SS Infrastructure: A Closer Look at the Builder's Track Record
In the real estate sector, choosing a reputable builder can make a significant difference in your home-buying experience. Today, we examine SS Infrastructure, a builder currently operating in Chhattisgarh, with a focus on their legal history and customer satisfaction.
Overview of SS Infrastructure
SS Infrastructure has an intriguing record, having faced one complaint and concluding a legal case with an unfavorable outcome. With a solitary case to consider, it is critical to analyze the details to understand the builder's standing.
Legal Case Summary
SS Infrastructure has been involved in legal disputes resulting in one case lost and one case win. Here’s a summary of the primary legal proceeding:
- Appellant's Claim: The appellant argued that the builder had not paid the lease amount, suggesting issues of financial accountability.
- Respondent's Claim: In contrast, SS Infrastructure asserted that the lease payment had …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against SS Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered. The primary theme in these cases revolves around "Lease Payment Disputes."
Many of the disputes center around the builder's obligation to pay lease amounts, with the appellant often claiming that the respondent failed to honor this commitment. The builder, on the other hand, consistently maintained that the requisite payments had been made, indicating a fundamental communication gap or a lack of transparent reporting in their dealings.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contested payments, resulting in the authority intervening to settle the discrepancy. Patterns emerge that suggest a prevalent trigger for these disputes: the builder's perceived non-fulfillment of contractual obligations, particularly concerning compensation for leased properties.
The outcomes of these cases reveal that the builder lost primarily due to insufficient evidence to support …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!