CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the real estate sector, choosing a reputable builder can make a significant difference in your home-buying experience. Today, we examine SS Infrastructure, a builder currently operating in Chhattisgarh, with a focus on their legal history and customer satisfaction.
SS Infrastructure has an intriguing record, having faced one complaint and concluding a legal case with an unfavorable outcome. With a solitary case to consider, it is critical to analyze the details to understand the builder's standing.
SS Infrastructure has been involved in legal disputes resulting in one case lost and one case win. Here’s a summary of the primary legal proceeding:
Since SS Infrastructure has only one recorded loss, a significant pattern cannot be established with just one case; however, the nature of the complaint suggests potential weaknesses in their financial dealings. The loss indicates that disputes over lease payments could represent a worrying sign for buyers regarding the builder’s financial practices.
Similarly, with only one legal win, it is tough to derive a conclusive pattern in the builder's ability to defend against complaints. The ruling in their favor does not suggest any strong precedent, especially since the awarded payment was nominal at Rs. 6/-. This could imply that the builder’s defenses may not be robust in safeguarding against claims.
In evaluating SS Infrastructure, the single complaint, alongside no cases won and one case lost, warrants caution for potential buyers. While it is not uncommon for builders to face disputes, this builder’s legal history raises some flags regarding financial reliability and project accountability.
By considering the factors above, potential buyers can make a more informed decision and avoid potential pitfalls in their real estate investments. Stay wise and well-informed in your journey to property ownership!
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against SS Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered. The primary theme in these cases revolves around "Lease Payment Disputes."
Many of the disputes center around the builder's obligation to pay lease amounts, with the appellant often claiming that the respondent failed to honor this commitment. The builder, on the other hand, consistently maintained that the requisite payments had been made, indicating a fundamental communication gap or a lack of transparent reporting in their dealings.
Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contested payments, resulting in the authority intervening to settle the discrepancy. Patterns emerge that suggest a prevalent trigger for these disputes: the builder's perceived non-fulfillment of contractual obligations, particularly concerning compensation for leased properties.
The outcomes of these cases reveal that the builder lost primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims of having made the necessary payments. This highlights a critical issue within their operational practices, specifically potential inadequacies in record-keeping or financial reporting that hindered their ability to substantiate their position in court.
Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for builders to maintain meticulous financial records and ensure compliance with the terms of their agreements. It also serves as a cautionary tale for buyers, who should be vigilant and thoroughly investigate a builder’s reputation and previous legal disputes before entering into any agreements.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
356-(805-209-00634) | Chhattisgarh | Chhattisgarh RERA vs Pratishtha, Promoter-SS Infr… | ["Lease agreement"] | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Chhattisgarh RERA | SS Infrastructure | https://rera.cgstate.gov.in/Content/ComplaintDocuments/Application_M-COM-2019-00631/FILE_FINAL_ORDER_8cf3b3f7-4297-4378-9110-d2771ba2d712.pdf |