SSAKASH DEVELOPERS & BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, having a reliable and trustworthy builder is crucial for potential homebuyers. Today, we delve into Ssakash Developers & Builders Private Limited, a builder operating in Maharashtra. With a track record of legal disputes and resolutions, this article aims to provide insights into their performance based on available data.

Complaints and Legal History

Ssakash Developers & Builders Private Limited has been the subject of a total of 3 complaints. Out of these, they have won 2 cases and lost 1 case. These figures suggest a mixed record in terms of legal disputes, warranting a closer look at the specifics of their cases.

Cases Lost

The builder faced one notable case where they filed and lost. Here is a summary of that case:

• Final Verdict: The appeal was dismissed for a want of compliance with the Proviso to Section 43(5) of the Act.

This loss indicates a potential oversight in adhering to procedural requirements, which serves as a cautionary note for potential buyers regarding the builder's administrative practices and compliance with regulatory standards.

Cases Won

In contrast, Ssakash Developers & Builders also secured victories in two legal cases. Here’s a synopsis of these outcomes:

1. Case One: The application to condone a delay of five days in submitting an appeal was allowed, as the non-applicant had no objections.
2. Case Two: The tribunal ruled in favor of the builder, asserting that the proviso to Section 43(5) of the Act was not applicable at the stage of application for condonation of delay.

The successful resolutions in these cases demonstrate the builder's ability to navigate legal processes effectively, emphasizing their competency when they address appeals and procedural issues.

Analysis of Patterns

Cases Lost

The single case lost highlights a specific challenge regarding compliance with statutory requirements. The builder’s inability to meet the necessary compliance standards suggests that potential clients should carefully review the builder’s adherence to local laws and regulations.

Cases Won

The cases won illustrate a couple of key strengths for Ssakash Developers & Builders: they are proactive in filing appeals and have effectively addressed issues related to procedural delays. The lack of objections from the opposing parties in one case indicates a level of negotiation or cooperation that can be favorable to clients in conflict resolution scenarios.

Conclusion

Based on the data available, Ssakash Developers & Builders Private Limited has demonstrated a mixed performance in legal matters. While they have successfully navigated certain procedural challenges, the single case lost serves as a reminder of the importance of compliance with the law.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Do Your Homework: Investigate the builder's history and legal track record before making a purchase. Understanding previous complaints can provide valuable insight into potential issues.
• Ask About Compliance: Inquire about the builder’s adherence to local laws and regulations to ensure that they maintain high standards.
• Look for Transparency: A builder who openly discusses past complaints and legal issues may be more trustworthy than one who does not.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Research Online Reviews: Look for feedback from previous customers to gauge the builder's reputation.
2. Check for Certifications: Ensure that the builder has all necessary licenses and certifications to operate.
3. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit other projects completed by the builder to assess quality and craftsmanship.

In conclusion, while Ssakash Developers & Builders has had some legal challenges, their victories indicate a certain level of resilience and capability in addressing complex construction and legal matters. As always, prospective buyers should conduct thorough due diligence to make informed decisions.

The analysis of the cases filed by Ssakash Developers & Builders Private Limited, which it lost, reveals several important insights into the builder's legal disputes. These cases predominantly fell into three common themes: Non-compliance with Legal Requirements, Delays in Project Delivery, and Regulatory Disputes.

1. Non-compliance with Legal Requirements: In this category, the builder faced challenges concerning compliance with various laws and regulations governing construction practices. The builders often attempted to contest the application of certain legal provisions that they believed were not applicable to their case, but the courts upheld the existing legal frameworks, demonstrating the importance of adhering to established rules.
2. Delays in Project Delivery: Many of the disputes revolved around delayed possession of properties. Ssakash Developers frequently attributed project delays to external factors, perhaps aiming to mitigate penalties or claims from prospective buyers. However, these claims were often rejected by the court, indicating that the burden of proof fell heavily on the builder to show the legitimacy of their claims for any delays.
3. Regulatory Disputes: The builder's involvement in disputes concerning regulatory compliance issues also stands out. These cases often stemmed from local municipal or regulatory bodies enforcing compliance mandates, which the builder contested in court. The inability to sufficiently demonstrate compliance or address regulatory concerns led to unfavorable verdicts for the builder.

In examining the common reasons for the builder's losses, it is evident that the recurring themes underscore a broader pattern of litigation driven by non-compliance with legal stipulations, lack of evidence to support claims concerning delays, and failure to properly navigate the regulatory landscape. The dismissal of these cases typically resulted from the builder's insufficient compliance with court requirements, as illustrated by the decision in which the appeal was dismissed due to a failure to meet the Proviso to Section 43(5) of the applicable law. These outcomes serve as a cautionary tale for potential investors and buyers to remain vigilant and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with builders who may find themselves in such predictable and troubling legal predicaments.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Ssakash Developers & Builders Private Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around two key themes: the condonation of delay in appeals and legal compliance regarding the applicability of certain regulations.

In the cases where Ssakash Developers sought to condone delays, it became evident that the primary objective was to ensure their appeals could be heard despite procedural hiccups. Conversely, the defense typically raised arguments surrounding the interpretation of legal provisions, particularly Section 43(5) of the Act. The precedent here shows a pattern where Ssakash Developers was committed to resolving disputes through legal means, often arising from delays attributed to external factors rather than their own shortcomings.

The builder brought these cases to court mainly to contest perceived penalties and litigation based on alleged delays. In instances where they faced accusations from the other party regarding procedural lapses or compliance issues, the builder successfully demonstrated that they adhered to necessary legal precepts or that the opposing party's claims were absent of sufficient evidence. The recurring factor in their victories often stemmed from the opposing parties' failure to comprehensively back their claims, sometimes leading to the dismissal of cases on such grounds.

The success of Ssakash Developers in these cases reflects a favorable reputation, particularly as they seem adept at defending against inconsistent allegations. The real estate market can be contentious, where buyers may occasionally push false narratives or misinterpretations regarding builders' conduct to leverage more favorable outcomes for themselves. This scrutiny illustrates the necessity for builders like Ssakash Developers to maintain robust legal representation to uphold their interests.

In conclusion, this analysis serves as a critical reminder to potential buyers about the significance of making informed decisions regarding builders. While there are genuine disputes that arise in the realm of real estate, the evidence from these cases underscores that reputable builders, such as Ssakash Developers & Builders Private Limited, often stand their ground against unjustified claims. Buyers should approach allegations against builders with caution, ensuring they seek factual data and reliable insights to properly assess a builder's reputation within the industry.