S.S.CONBUILD PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate development, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a seamless buying experience. In this post, we will explore the legal record of S.S.Conbuild Private Limited, examining their history of complaints and legal cases to provide potential buyers with the necessary insights.

Overview of Legal Issues

S.S.Conbuild Private Limited has one recorded complaint against them. The details of this complaint reveal several important factors that buyers should consider:

1. Number of Complaints: 1
2. Cases Won: 0
3. Cases Lost: 1

Case Details

• Case Summary: The lone complaint against S.S.Conbuild was initially filed by a complainant. However, the complainant later withdrew the complaint, with the option to file the same complaint before the appropriate authority, forum, or tribunal. The case was, therefore, dismissed during this process.

Analysis of Legal Outcomes

Patterns in Lost Cases

Given the limited number of cases, patterns are not easily identifiable in cases lost by S.S.Conbuild. However, the absence of any ongoing cases may suggest a lack of unresolved disputes at this time.

Patterns in Won Cases

Interestingly, S.S.Conbuild does not have any cases classified as won. The only documented case reflects a withdrawal rather than a victory for the builder. Thus, the notable lack of successful outcomes could be a potential red flag.

Conclusion

From the available data, S.S.Conbuild Private Limited appears to have a minimal legal history, with only one recorded complaint that was dismissed. However, it's essential to note that their lack of any assessed victories in legal proceedings might indicate underlying issues that potential buyers should scrutinize further before engaging with the builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's track record, looking for additional feedback and reviews from former clients.
• Request Detailed Information: Buyers should ask for comprehensive details about any legal matters relating to the builder, including their resolution processes.
• Assess Transparency: Ensure the builder provides clear information about their projects and business practices.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check Credentials and Reputation: Look into the builder’s background, years in business, and projects completed.
• Review Past Projects: Visit previously developed sites to assess quality and designs first-hand.
• Understand the Contract: Always read and comprehend the terms and conditions before signing a contract, preferably with legal assistance.

By equipping yourself with detailed knowledge and insights, you can better navigate your options and make an informed decision when considering S.S.Conbuild Private Limited or any other builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against S.S. Conbuild Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key points regarding their legal disputes.

The primary theme observed in these cases is the "Withdrawal and Refiling of Complaints." This highlights an unusual approach taken by the complainants, who initially filed complaints only to withdraw them later with the intention of refiling through more appropriate legal avenues.

The common reason for bringing cases to court in this instance seems to revolve around the complainants' strategic decision to withdraw and refile, rather than engaging in a direct confrontation with the builder's defense. The pattern emerging from the summary indicates that the builder’s litigation may have been triggered by complaints that were not necessarily aimed at securing an immediate verdict but rather at preserving the right to seek justice at a later stage.

As for why the builder lost these cases, it is evident that the primary factor was not a result of the builder's defense or actions during the litigation process. Instead, the complaints were dismissed due to the complainants' choice to withdraw, which reflects a tactical maneuver rather than a shortfall on the builder's part. However, this highlights the importance of considering all legal options and the potential for cases to be dismissed on procedural grounds rather than merit.