| CIN | U70100MH2017PTC289917 |
|---|---|
| Year Established | 25-Jan-17 |
| Address | 1, Ramkrupa Bldg, Devji Bhimji Lane, Mathuradas Road, Kandivali (West), Mumbai Mumbai City MH 400067 IN |
| Company Status | Private |
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for the success of your investment. One such builder is SSD Escatics Private Limited, which has made its mark primarily in Maharashtra. In this blog post, we will analyze SSD Escatics' performance based on the available legal cases, highlighting trends in their legal history and offering guidance for prospective buyers.
Examination of Legal Cases
Overview of Complaints and Outcomes
SSD Escatics has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which have resulted in losses for the builder. The details of these legal encounters reflect a trend that potential buyers should find noteworthy.
Patterns in Lost Cases
The builder's legal struggles involve two similar scenarios, where the applicant in each case claimed a delay of 7 days in filing their appeal due to unforeseen circumstances. Notably, the respondent (SSD Escatics) did not file any claims of their own, which raises questions about their engagement in the legal process. The tribunal ultimately allowed these appeals, demonstrating a route where the builder was unable to defend itself effectively, leading to a total of 0 cases won against these complaints.
Patterns in Won Cases
Interestingly, despite the overall losses, the records demonstrate that the builder successfully managed to have the delay in filing appeals condoned by the tribunal. This indicates a procedural win rather than a substantive legal victory, as the builder did not challenge any claims made against it. Instead, they successfully gained allowance for an appeal, showcasing a potential strength in navigating procedural aspects, but lacking in defense against allegations.
Conclusion and Assessment of SSD Escatics
Based on the legal data available, SSD Escatics Private Limited shows a concerning pattern of failing to win any cases it has faced. Both recorded cases highlight a lack of proactive legal defense, which could be a red flag for potential buyers.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Look beyond the builder's marketing materials; check for any existing complaints or legal issues similar to those seen with SSD Escatics.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consulting with a real estate attorney can provide insights into potential risks associated with purchasing from a builder with legal troubles.
- Investigate Other Projects: Inquire about other completed projects by SSD Escatics in Maharashtra. Seek feedback from previous customers regarding their experiences.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reviews and Ratings: Websites that aggregate customer feedback can provide a more comprehensive view of a builder's reputation.
- Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit properties previously constructed by the builder to inspect quality and craftsmanship firsthand.
- Get Everything in Writing: Ensure that all agreements and promises are documented to protect your interests.
In conclusion, while SSD Escatics Private Limited operates in a prominent market, buyers must tread carefully. Due diligence is key to making an informed investment in real estate.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against SSD Escatics Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: Delayed Possession Claims and appeals based on Unforeseen Circumstances.
The Delayed Possession Claims appear to stem from the builder's inability to complete projects on time, which is a recurring issue in the construction sector. This often results in dissatisfaction among buyers who expect timely possession of their properties. However, in the cases summarized, the builder's defense revolved around appeals for condonation of delays due to unforeseen circumstances rather than addressing the possession delays directly.
The Unforeseen Circumstances Appeals represent a common tactic employed by the builder to seek extensions or accommodations in the legal process. In each case, the builder claimed that there was a delay of 7 days in filing their appeal due to unforeseen circumstances. The tribunal's acceptance of this defense suggests a degree of leniency in the legal system towards builders who can adequately justify procedural delays.
A pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder’s litigation often centers around procedural matters rather than substantive issues of contractual obligations or project delivery timelines. This might indicate that buyers are more likely to contest procedural penalties or delays attributed to the builder rather than the builder's failure to meet project timelines or other contractual commitments.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to prevent delays in the first place, as well as a lack of proactive engagement with buyers regarding project timelines and expectations. Although their appeals for unforeseen circumstances were accepted, the underlying issues of delayed possession and project timelines were not addressed, leading to legal consequences.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M.A745-2022 | Maharashtra | The applicant filed an application for condonatio… | ["Delay in filing a… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Mr. Umesh R. Pursna… | SSD Escatics Privat… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1fesINsAoU5Jg-tsDZ-WthGjeMg3GbmLE |