CIN | U70100MH2017PTC289917 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 1, Ramkrupa Bldg, Devji Bhimji Lane, Mathuradas Road, Kandivali (West), Mumbai Mumbai City MH 400067 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the competitive landscape of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for the success of your investment. One such builder is SSD Escatics Private Limited, which has made its mark primarily in Maharashtra. In this blog post, we will analyze SSD Escatics' performance based on the available legal cases, highlighting trends in their legal history and offering guidance for prospective buyers.
Examination of Legal Cases
Overview of Complaints and Outcomes
SSD Escatics has faced a total of 2 complaints, both of which have resulted in losses for the builder. The details of these legal encounters reflect a trend that potential buyers should find noteworthy.
Patterns in Lost Cases
The builder's legal struggles involve two similar scenarios, where the applicant in each case claimed a delay of 7 days in filing their appeal due to unforeseen circumstances. Notably, the respondent (SSD Escatics) did not file any …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against SSD Escatics Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key insights into their legal disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two themes: Delayed Possession Claims and appeals based on Unforeseen Circumstances.
The Delayed Possession Claims appear to stem from the builder's inability to complete projects on time, which is a recurring issue in the construction sector. This often results in dissatisfaction among buyers who expect timely possession of their properties. However, in the cases summarized, the builder's defense revolved around appeals for condonation of delays due to unforeseen circumstances rather than addressing the possession delays directly.
The Unforeseen Circumstances Appeals represent a common tactic employed by the builder to seek extensions or accommodations in the legal process. In each case, the builder claimed that there was a delay of 7 days in filing their appeal due to unforeseen circumstances. The …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!