No Logo Available

SSM BUILDERS & PROMOTERS

3.8/5 (15 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Tamil Nadu
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, the reputation of builders can significantly impact potential buyers' decisions. One such builder that has drawn attention due to ongoing legal challenges is SSM Builders & Promoters. This blog examines the builder's performance, recent legal disputes, and provides insights for potential buyers considering their projects.

Builder Performance Overview

SSM Builders & Promoters currently has a concerning record regarding customer satisfaction, with 15 complaints lodged against them, all resulting in losses in legal cases. This raises several flags about their commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations and delivering promised services.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Analyzing the cases filed against SSM Builders & Promoters reveals noteworthy patterns:

Common Factors in Lost Cases

  1. Delayed Handing Over of Flats: In multiple instances, complainants cited delays in the possession of flats, indicating a systemic issue within project timelines.
  2. Unfulfilled Promises on Amenities: Many cases highlighted …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Failure to Provide Promised Amenities Non-Compliance with Construction Agreements Penalties for Project Delays

Analysis of the cases filed against SSM Builders & Promoters, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and legal disputes. The cases primarily revolved around four key themes: delayed possession claims, failure to provide promised amenities, non-compliance with construction agreements, and penalties for project delays.

The majority of the cases were centered around claims of delayed possession, where the complainants asserted that the builder had failed to hand over flats on time, citing reasons like non-receipt of timely payments as the cause for the delay. However, the TNRERA consistently ruled against the builder by directing them to complete pending works and provide the promised amenities, indicating a pattern where the builder's defenses did not meet regulatory requirements.

Another recurring theme was the builder's failure to deliver the amenities promised in the construction agreements. This suggests a systemic issue where the builder may have been over-promising while …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review

Interested in buying from SSM BUILDERS & PROMOTERS?

Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.