| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive real estate market, the reputation of builders can significantly impact potential buyers' decisions. One such builder that has drawn attention due to ongoing legal challenges is SSM Builders & Promoters. This blog examines the builder's performance, recent legal disputes, and provides insights for potential buyers considering their projects.
Builder Performance Overview
SSM Builders & Promoters currently has a concerning record regarding customer satisfaction, with 15 complaints lodged against them, all resulting in losses in legal cases. This raises several flags about their commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations and delivering promised services.
Analysis of Legal Cases
Analyzing the cases filed against SSM Builders & Promoters reveals noteworthy patterns:
Common Factors in Lost Cases
- Delayed Handing Over of Flats: In multiple instances, complainants cited delays in the possession of flats, indicating a systemic issue within project timelines.
- Unfulfilled Promises on Amenities: Many cases highlighted the builder's failure to provide promised amenities, suggesting potential misrepresentation in their marketing or communication with customers.
- Non-Compliance with Construction Agreements: The repeated claims indicate that the builder did not adhere to the agreed-upon terms outlined in the construction agreements, leading to justified complaints from clients.
Common Factors in Won Cases
Interestingly, all 15 cases were lost by SSM Builders & Promoters, meaning there are no cases won. However, the consistent claim made by the builder during these disputes was that the delays were due to complainants' late payments. Although this argument was consistently raised, it ultimately did not lead to favorable outcomes.
Conclusion
Based on the data analyzed, SSM Builders & Promoters presents a troubling picture for potential buyers. With no legal victories on record and a series of complaints regarding essential project commitments, prospective clients should proceed with caution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder's previous projects, reviews, and overall reputation. Engage with previous buyers to gain firsthand insights into their experiences.
- Demand Transparency: Ensure the builder provides full details of the project timeline, payment schedules, and amenities promised before signing any agreement.
- Review Legal Records: If possible, check legal histories or any ongoing cases associated with SSM Builders & Promoters to assess potential risks.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Evaluate Experience: Choose builders with a substantial track record in completing projects on time and maintaining customer satisfaction.
- Check Compliance: Ensure the builder complies with local laws and regulations, as this can protect you from future legal disputes.
- Visit Previous Projects: Physically inspect completed projects to assess the quality of work and whether it aligns with what is being offered in current sales.
In summary, while SSM Builders & Promoters operates within Tamil Nadu, the concerning legal history should foster serious consideration among potential buyers. Making informed decisions based on available data can lead to more satisfactory home-buying experiences.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against SSM Builders & Promoters, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's operational practices and legal disputes. The cases primarily revolved around four key themes: delayed possession claims, failure to provide promised amenities, non-compliance with construction agreements, and penalties for project delays.
The majority of the cases were centered around claims of delayed possession, where the complainants asserted that the builder had failed to hand over flats on time, citing reasons like non-receipt of timely payments as the cause for the delay. However, the TNRERA consistently ruled against the builder by directing them to complete pending works and provide the promised amenities, indicating a pattern where the builder's defenses did not meet regulatory requirements.
Another recurring theme was the builder's failure to deliver the amenities promised in the construction agreements. This suggests a systemic issue where the builder may have been over-promising while under-delivering, leading to significant dissatisfaction among buyers. The TNRERA's rulings emphasized the importance of adhering to these agreements and ensuring that buyers receive what they were promised.
The cases also highlighted penalties imposed on the builder for contravening directions and failing to comply with the Act. This demonstrates a troubling trend where the builder did not take regulatory obligations seriously, leading to legal consequences that could have been avoided with adherence to rules and timelines.
A common trigger for the builder's litigation was the attribution of delays to buyers' actions, specifically late payments. However, the consistent rulings against the builder indicate that this defense was insufficient to override the builder's responsibilities under the construction agreements and applicable laws.
The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors, including insufficient evidence to support their claims of timely completion and compliance, failure to follow interim directions from authorities, and a fundamental misunderstanding of their obligations under the construction agreements.
Overall, these cases paint a picture of a builder that has faced considerable challenges in meeting regulatory requirements and fulfilling buyer expectations. Buyers considering projects by SSM Builders & Promoters should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence before committing to any agreements.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E.P.No.002/2023 in … | Tamil Nadu | The Execution Petitioners filed for enforcement o… | ["Penalty for non-c… | {"appellant_claim": "The Execution Petitioners fi… | Thiru P. Kalaamuthan | SSM Builders & Prom… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2023/EP_No/2,4-2023.pdf |
| 002/2021, 61 to 69,… | Tamil Nadu | The complainants filed complaints against M/s. SS… | ["Delay in handing … | {"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha… | Srimathi Sundaraval… | SSM Builders & Prom… | https://rera.tn.gov.in/cms/tnrera_judgements/2021/2,61to69,98,99,101-2021.pdf |