S.U.C. BUILDER & DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to purchasing a property, potential buyers need to conduct thorough research on builders and developers. One such name in the industry is S.U.C. Builder & Developers Private Limited, a company based in Madhya Pradesh. In this blog post, we will delve into the legal history and performance of this builder, analyzing their track record to help you make informed decisions.

Legal Case Overview

S.U.C. Builder & Developers has faced a total of 2 complaints. Unfortunately, the company lost both of these cases, indicating some patterns that might concern potential buyers.

Detailed Case Analysis

Cases Lost

Both cases filed against S.U.C. Builder & Developers highlight a recurring issue: non-fulfillment of contractual obligations. In these instances, the applicants alleged that the builder failed to develop the projects as promised and did not return amounts due, including principal sums and interest. Notably:

• In the first case, the appellant claimed the builder did not fulfill the terms of the contract and failed to return the consideration amount with interest.
• The second case echoed similar sentiments, where the applicant pointed out that the builder did not pay the promised consideration amount and did not honor the developmental terms.

The outcomes reveal a concerning pattern of the builder's inability to meet its contractual agreements. This raises a red flag for potential clients seeking reliability and adherence to professional commitments.

Cases Won

Interestingly, the summary provided indicates the builder won cases that seem to involve complications in mutual obligations. Key takeaways include:

• In both instances, S.U.C. Builder countered the claims by alleging that the applicants did not meet their booking payment obligations.
• Even in lost cases, the adjudicating officer ruled in favor of the applicants by awarding them payments for principal amounts, interest, and compensation for distress.

From these outcomes, it appears that while S.U.C. Builder can defend against situations where clients have not adhered to their booking payments, their overall track record in fulfilling their obligations to clients appears significantly weaker.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, S.U.C. Builder & Developers Private Limited demonstrates a concerning legal history regarding contractual obligations. With 0 cases won and 2 lost, potential buyers should approach with caution. Here are some tips to consider:

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Ensure to check for complaints and legal cases against the builder before making commitments.
2. Demand Transparency: Seek detailed contracts that outline all terms and conditions clearly.
3. Consult Past Clients: It's beneficial to speak with previous clients to gauge their experiences.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Verify Credentials: Always check the legitimacy and certifications of the builder.
• Visit Previous Projects: Inspect past projects to assess quality and adherence to deadlines.
• Clarify Financial Obligations: Understand all financial aspects upfront to avoid disputes later.

Choosing a builder is a critical step in your real estate journey. By arming yourself with information and approaching your decision with care, you can significantly enhance your chances of a successful property acquisition.

Analysis of the cases filed against S.U.C. Builder & Developers Private Limited, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's dealings and the common themes that arose in litigation.

The cases could be grouped into several categories, with a prevalent theme being Breach of Contract Claims. In these instances, both parties accused each other of failing to fulfill their obligations under the contract. The builder was often claimed to have not returned the consideration amount or developed projects as promised, while the applicants were accused of not paying their due share of the booking amount.

Another theme was Failure to Return Consideration Amount, where the builder was consistently ordered to repay the principal amount owed, along with interest and compensation for distress caused. This highlights a serious concern regarding the builder's financial accountability and adherence to contractual terms.

Disputes over Project Development also emerged as a common theme. Here, the builder faced allegations of failing to develop properties in a timely manner, which reflects a broader pattern of dissatisfaction with the builder's project management capabilities.

The reasons people brought cases to court varied; however, a pattern of contesting financial obligations and project delivery timelines was evident. Many disputes revolved around the builder’s failure to meet contractual requirements, leading to claims of subpar development and unfulfilled promises.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to its inability to honor agreements and return consideration amounts on time. Insufficient evidence to defend their actions, combined with a record of non-compliance with contractual obligations, undermined their position in litigation. Furthermore, failure to address grievances regarding project development timelines resulted in consistent legal losses.