SUCKER INFRACON PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the real estate sector, selecting the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth buying experience and securing your investment. Sucker Infracon Private Limited is a builder with a presence in Gujarat, but before you consider investing, let’s delve into their legal history and assess what that might mean for potential buyers.

Legal Overview

Sucker Infracon Private Limited has a notable legal history marked by a single complaint against them. Unfortunately for the company, they have lost this case, which indicates that there might be serious concerns regarding their practices or commitments.

Complaint and Verdict

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1

The sole case filed against Sucker Infracon resulted in a penalty imposed by the authority, which fined the builder Rs. 1,25,000 for violating Section 11(2) of the applicable Act. This violation could signal issues with their adherence to contractual obligations, which is a red flag for potential buyers.

Analysis of Patterns

Cases Lost

The single case that Sucker Infracon has lost demonstrates a concerning trend for potential buyers. The fact that they have no wins to their name suggests a lack of legal leverage in disputes. Losing a case can point to operational or managerial deficiencies that could affect project delivery and customer satisfaction.

Cases Won

On the other hand, it is noteworthy that the builder has won no cases. The absence of any successful defenses could indicate that the builder has not been proactive about its contractual commitments or that they have a pattern of non-compliance which has led to the legal challenges they face.

Conclusion

Sucker Infracon Private Limited’s legal profile presents a significant risk for prospective buyers. With only one recorded legal case resulting in a loss, this builder appears to have a challenging reputation in terms of meeting customer expectations and complying with legal standards.

Buyer Tips

For those considering purchasing from Sucker Infracon, here are some tips:

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Before finalizing any deals, investigate further. Look deeper into any reviews or complaints that may not be documented but are shared by previous customers.
2. Seek Legal Counsel: If you decide to move forward, consider consulting with a legal expert before signing any contracts to ensure that your interests are protected.
3. Request Detailed Documentation: Ask for detailed information regarding past projects, delivery timelines, and any previous legal disputes to gauge their reliability.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Review Track Record: Always check a builder’s history, including any legal disputes, customer complaints, and project completion rates.
2. Analyze Financial Stability: A builder’s financial health can directly impact their ability to complete projects on time.
3. Visit Completed Projects: Physically visiting past projects gives you a clearer picture of the quality of work.
4. Ask for References: Speak with previous clients to get first-hand feedback about their experiences with the builder.

In conclusion, while Sucker Infracon Private Limited serves the Gujarat market, their legal challenges may make potential buyers think twice. It is essential to approach the home buying process with diligence and a focus on protecting your investment.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sucker Infracon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory non-compliance and penalties for project delays.

The builder faced penalties due to violations of legal requirements, specifically Section 11(2) of the Act, which led to a fine of Rs. 1,25,000 imposed by the Authority. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal consequences when they fail to adhere to the regulatory framework surrounding real estate development.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for delays or violations, and disputing project delays attributed to other parties. Builders often find themselves in court due to disagreements over project timelines, regulatory compliance, or other contractual obligations. In the case of Sucker Infracon, the primary trigger for litigation was its failure to comply with legal standards, leading to an imposed penalty.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to their non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements. The imposed fine serves as a case in point: it was a direct result of the builder’s violation of Section 11(2) of the Act. Such outcomes emphasize the importance of understanding and adhering to the rules that govern the construction and real estate sector. Builders should take heed of these legal obligations to avoid similar penalties and maintain a positive standing in the industry.