SUMANGAL INFA

Introduction

In the complex world of real estate, understanding a builder's track record can greatly influence your purchasing decision. One such builder, Sumangal Infa, operates primarily in Gujarat and has recently been the subject of scrutiny due to a legal case under the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's performance based on the data available, analyzing their legal history and providing insights for potential buyers.

Legal Context

Sumangal Infa has faced limited legal challenges, with only one complaint filed against them. The case revolves around a violation of the RERA Act, where the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority claimed that the builder failed to submit quarterly reports on time. During the proceedings, Sumangal Infa acknowledged their mistake and expressed remorse for not being aware of the regulations. Consequently, the Authority imposed a penalty of ₹50,000, which the builder has been ordered to pay.

Analysis of Cases

Patterns in Cases Won

Interestingly, Sumangal Infa has not won any cases. The single legal matter they faced ended with the builder losing and subsequently incurring a fine. This lack of successful outcomes might suggest a need for greater diligence in compliance with regulatory requirements.

Patterns in Cases Lost

The sole case against Sumangal Infa highlights a clear trend of non-compliance with RERA regulations. Their admittance to the violation creates a pattern indicating that the builder may not be entirely up-to-date with the legal frameworks governing real estate transactions. Such oversight could potentially place them at a disadvantage in future dealings.

Conclusion

Overall, Sumangal Infa's performance, as indicated by the available data, shows a concerning trend regarding compliance with industry regulations. With one complaint leading to a loss and no cases won, it raises a red flag for potential buyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Conduct Registration Checks: Before entering any agreement, verify whether the builder is registered with the RERA and check any complaints lodged against them.
• Review Regulatory Compliance: Ensure that the builder complies with local laws, including timely submissions of required reports.
• Seek Client Testimonials: Look for reviews from past buyers to gauge their experiences with the builder.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Research Their Reputation: Investigate the builder's history, including past projects and any legal issues.
• Check Project Quality: Visit existing projects to assess construction quality and design.
• Evaluate Financial Stability: Ensure the builder has a good financial standing to avoid project delays.
• Understand the Terms: Read and comprehend all contractual obligations and terms before signing.

In conclusion, while Sumangal Infa has only faced one complaint leading to a penalty, this alone warrants careful consideration from potential buyers. Staying informed and cautious can safeguard against potential pitfalls in real estate investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sumangal Infa that the builder lost revealed several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered in real estate transactions. The cases highlight two primary themes: regulatory compliance issues and delayed reporting penalties.

In terms of regulatory compliance, the builder faced scrutiny from the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) regarding their adherence to the provisions outlined in the RERA Act. Specifically, the case demonstrated how failure to submit quarterly reports as mandated by the authority resulted in a direct violation of the law. This theme showcases a common struggle faced by builders who may not be fully acquainted with the regulatory framework surrounding their operations. The lack of awareness can lead to inadvertent mistakes, as seen in this case where the builder expressed regret and admitted to the violation.

The penalty imposed in this case (₹50,000) highlights the financial repercussions builders face when they do not comply with critical regulatory requirements. The RERA's decision to impose a penalty not only serves as a deterrent to Sumangal Infa but also indicates to prospective buyers that the authority takes compliance seriously, which can affect the builders' credibility in the market.

The reasons people commonly bring cases to court in scenarios involving builders typically center around contesting penalties, disputing project delays, and disagreements over land or project classification. In the case of Sumangal Infa, the builder's lack of timely reporting was a significant trigger for the litigation, leading to a pattern that suggests accountability in reporting is a crucial aspect of real estate management.

The conclusion drawn from the outcomes of these cases is that builders lose primarily due to insufficient compliance with legal or regulatory requirements. In this instance, it was the failure to adhere to reporting obligations that resulted in the penalty. Such outcomes underline the importance for builders to familiarize themselves with the RERA Act and other relevant laws to avoid similar repercussions in the future.