CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When considering a builder for your next home investment, understanding their track record can be immensely beneficial. Sun Builders Group operates in Gujarat and has a minimal but notable legal history that potential homebuyers should be aware of. In this blog, we will analyze the complaint data against Sun Builders Group, how they have fared in legal cases, and provide valuable tips for prospective buyers.
Sun Builders Group has faced only one complaint to date, which raises questions about their business practices and customer satisfaction. Their legal history indicates a cautious approach towards both conflicts and customer relationships.
The complaint against Sun Builders Group was formally filed by a complainant who cited unspecified issues with the builder. Notably, this case was unique in that the final verdict came as a result of the complaint being withdrawn by the complainant, rather than a resolution being reached through legal means.
Given the solitary complaint resulting in a loss for Sun Builders Group, there are no patterns to draw from multiple case outcomes. The only case filed indicates there might have been sufficient concern for the complainant to initially pursue action, but ultimately chose to withdraw, suggesting the issues could potentially have been non-serious or resolved informally.
On the other hand, the single claim that resulted in a win for Sun Builders Group was also concluded by the complainant choosing to withdraw, not by a favorable ruling from the court. This further complicates any patterns of success with claims against the builder, as there are no tangible cases won in the builder’s favor that could validate their performance post-complaint.
Based on the available data, Sun Builders Group has a very limited track record in handling customer complaints, with one concluded case that was withdrawn without a resolution being met. This brings both opportunities and challenges for potential homebuyers.
While Sun Builders Group presents a unique case for potential home buyers, a careful approach, armed with thorough research and the right questions, can help ensure that any investment made is sound. Always remember that a builder’s history is just one piece of the puzzle; your individual experience and expectations will ultimately determine your satisfaction with your new home.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against M/s Sun Builders Group, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns underlying the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three main topics: delayed possession claims, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays.
The first type of cases involves delayed possession claims, where complainants often allege that the builder failed to deliver units within the promised timelines. This is a common theme in real estate disputes and typically arises due to mismanagement, unforeseen circumstances, or inadequate project planning.
The second category encompasses disputes related to land conversion or classification. Here, issues may revolve around the builder's adherence to municipal regulations regarding land use, zoning, and other statutory requirements. Complaints often arise when builders are accused of non-compliance, which can lead to legal consequences and dissatisfaction among buyers.
The final category pertains to penalties imposed on the builder for delays in project completion. In these cases, the builder may face legal challenges contesting the penalties, arguing that the delays were caused by external factors beyond their control. Alternatively, buyers may dispute the builder's claims of timely completion, leading to a legal standoff.
A pattern that emerges from these summaries is that people commonly bring cases to court due to financial and temporal investments in their property. They may contest penalties to avoid additional financial burdens, dispute delays to secure timely possession, or argue over land classification to ensure compliance with regulatory frameworks that might affect their investment.
The builder's losses in these cases often stem from several factors, including insufficient evidence to support their claims, non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements, and failure to adhere to interim directions from courts or regulatory bodies. Misunderstandings of land or project classification rules also frequently lead to legal repercussions, indicating a need for builders to ensure thorough legal scrutiny before proceeding with projects.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!