SUNDERLAL MOHANLAL HUF

Introduction

In the often turbulent world of real estate, buyers are keen to ensure they are dealing with reliable builders. One such builder that stands out is Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF, known for their remarkable legal success rate and projects primarily located in Maharashtra. This article delves into their legal history, analyzes the patterns in the cases they have won, and provides vital tips for potential real estate buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF has a striking record of having 30 complaints filed against them, all of which have culminated in victories—30 cases won and 0 cases lost. This is a formidable track record for any builder and suggests a strong performance in legal matters.

Analysis of Legal Cases

Winning Patterns

1. Consistency in Winning Claims: The builder's legal success seems connected to consistent claims involving Man Global Ltd. and Anr. These cases typically revolve around developments claiming that certain actions taken by Man Realty Limited in the NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal) had direct implications.
2. Condonation of Delay: Many cases involved the applicants seeking condonation of delay in filing appeals against orders passed by MahaRERA (Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority). The tribunal frequently ruled in favor of the builder, allowing appeals to be prosecuted on the merits, reflecting a sound legal strategy and preparedness on their part.
3. Even Distribution of Results: The cases also highlight that the builder was successful in having the legal process continue and not stall, with multiple cases adjourned for further hearings on predetermined dates. This illustrates not just success but the effectiveness of ongoing legal management.

Characteristics of Lost Cases

Interestingly, though Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF has not lost any cases, patterns can be identified in the types of claims that were presented:

1. Involvement of External Claims: Several cases involved claims against third parties like Man Global Ltd. This indicates the builder often finds itself amidst disputes involving other entities within the real estate sector.
2. Timing Issues: Some proceedings were marked by delays and adjournments, which suggests that potential issues may linger but are resolved positively in future hearings.

Conclusion: An Overall Assessment

Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF showcases an impeccable legal standing with a zero-loss record and has proven its efficacy in navigating complex real estate regulations. Such a performance is bolster for prospective buyers aiming for reliability in real estate dealings. Their projects, primarily situated in Maharashtra, can be seen as a safe bet given their strong advocacy and resolution skills in legal matters.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before purchasing, investigate the builder's previous projects, legal standing, and customer reviews to ensure you're making an informed investment.
2. Understand the Legalities: Familiarize yourself with the laws and regulations governing real estate in your state. Utilize legal counsel to review contracts and agreements.
3. Look for Transparency: A trustworthy builder should be transparent about their projects, the buying process, as well as any past legal issues. Ensure communication is clear and open.
4. Assess Financial Stability: Evaluate the financial health of the builder to discern their capacity to complete current and future projects.
5. Check Regulatory Compliance: Ensure that the builder complies with all local real estate regulations and the projects are registered with governing bodies like MahaRERA.

By following these guidelines and keeping the information on Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF in mind, potential buyers can make well-informed decisions in their real estate ventures.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder's disputes revolve predominantly around themes such as regulatory compliance and delays, attempts to condone delays in appealing decisions, disputes over project responsiveness, claims of unfair practices from respondents, and issues related to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

1. Regulatory Compliance and Delays: The builder frequently found itself in litigation regarding claims of delays in projects or compliance with regulatory bodies. In such cases, arguments were often made by both parties concerning developments within affiliated companies and the impact on project delivery timelines. The builder's defense often hinged on proving that they were not at fault for delays attributed to external factors, showcasing their commitment to timely project completion.
2. Condonation of Delay in Appeals: A notable number of cases involved the builder seeking retakes on previously dismissed appeals due to delays. In these instances, the tribunal ruled in favor of the builder, often citing that sufficient cause was shown for the delays, which further emphasizes the builder's proactive approach in seeking to resolve disputes.
3. Disputes Over Project Responsiveness: Claims involving dissatisfaction from appellants concerning real estate dealings often led to litigation. The builder was successful in countering these complaints by demonstrating that issues raised had already been addressed or settled amicably, thus reinforcing its credibility.
4. Claims of Unfair Practices: The builder faced accusations of unfair tactics, which were generally rebuffed due to lack of substantive evidence presented by the opposing parties. This pattern indicates the builder's fair conduct in business and shows that they are capable of defending their practices effectively against exaggerated claims.
5. NCLT-Related Disputes: Several cases related to orders passed by the NCLT were brought up. The builder asserted that these orders had already been contested successfully, leading to adjournments for further hearings. This suggests the builder's ongoing engagement with regulatory processes and readiness to defend its stance in face of challenges.

The common reasons for the builder's success in these cases often involved insufficient evidentiary support from the opposing party, non-compliance with procedural norms by adversaries, or failures to substantiate claims of misconduct. Such outcomes illustrate that Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF has been effective in safeguarding itself from unjust claims, asserting its position forcefully against potentially misleading accusations by buyers or competitors.

This analysis presents insights into the builder's reputation in the broader real estate market, indicating that while the sector can be rife with conflicts, builders like Sunderlal Mohanlal HUF demonstrate a robust capacity to mitigate and refute illegitimate claims. As a potential buyer, it is vital to navigate the complexities of real estate disputes with careful consideration and diligence.

In conclusion, while disputes are a natural occurrence within the real estate sector, the successful defense by builders against unwarranted allegations highlights the necessity for buyers to engage in detailed research and seek reliable sources before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. A balanced perspective can lead to informed decisions that safeguard both investments and trust in builders.

This dictionary encompasses key themes from the cases and provides a comprehensive analysis that could serve as a guide for potential buyers in the real estate market.