| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
When considering a property investment, it's crucial to evaluate the reputation and reliability of the builder involved. This post focuses on Sunita Developers, a builder with a footprint in Chhattisgarh, analyzing their complaint history and legal cases to provide potential buyers with essential insights.
Overview of Sunita Developers
Sunita Developers has received a total of 2 complaints. In legal proceedings, they have been involved in 2 cases, winning 1 and losing 1. This mixed track record prompts examination of the circumstances surrounding each case to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the builder.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
In the case where Sunita Developers lost, the appellant raised significant concerns regarding the builder's performance:
- Delayed Possession: The applicant emphasized that their possession of the flat was unreasonably delayed.
- Improper Additional Charges: Allegations were made regarding the builder's improper collection of additional payments.
- …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Sunita Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: refund delays and misinformation, jurisdiction and registration compliance, and project completion and regulatory adherence.
The first type of case often revolved around the builder's failure to refund deposits made by buyers, as exemplified by the claim made by the applicant who paid Rs. 50,000 for a flat. In this case, the builder was accused of not only delaying the refund but also of providing inadequate information regarding the project's maintenance schedule and other critical details. This highlights a common trigger for litigation, where buyers feel cheated or inadequately informed.
The second theme addresses the builder's defense tactics, particularly concerning jurisdiction and compliance with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA). The builder claimed that the applicant lacked jurisdiction due to the flat being …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily fall into several common themes: delayed possession claims, disputes over additional amounts, and marketing compliance issues. Each of these categories highlights specific concerns that buyers had regarding their transactions and interactions with Sunita Developers.
- Delayed Possession Claims: Many cases involved complaints about delayed possession of flats. Buyers often felt that possession was not provided within the timeframe specified in agreements or marketing materials. The authority often evaluated if delays were due to actions or inactions of the buyers themselves, such as delays in payment.
- Additional Amount Disputes: Some claims revolved around arguments regarding improper collection of additional amounts. Buyers contended that they were charged fees that were not previously disclosed or justifiable. The builder, however, defended itself by proving that the claims were unfounded and rooted in misunderstandings …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!