SUNNY REAL CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Sunny Real Construction Private Limited, based in Rajasthan, has made a notable mark in the real estate sector. However, the company has also faced its share of legal challenges. In this blog post, we will analyze the builder's legal performance, focusing on the specifics of their complaints, cases won, and cases lost to provide potential buyers with valuable insights.

Legal Performance at a Glance

• Number of Complaints: 5
• Cases Won: 4
• Cases Lost: 1
• States with Projects: Rajasthan

Analysis of Legal Cases

Cases Lost by Sunny Real Construction

Sunny Real Construction has lost a total of 4 cases against complaints primarily concerning the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs):

• Common Factors in Lost Cases:
1. Non-Compliance with QPR Submissions: All lost cases involved allegations related to the builder’s failure to submit QPRs as required by law. Despite the builder's claims that they had submitted the necessary documentation, the consistent theme across these cases suggests a significant issue with compliance or communication.
2. Resolution through Submission of Pending QPRs: In each case, the authority ultimately accepted the submissions of pending QPRs, indicating that the builder may have been able to resolve the issues post-factum, though this resulted in negative legal findings initially.

Cases Won by Sunny Real Construction

Conversely, the builder has won 1 case:

• Common Factors in Won Cases:
1. Adherence to Legal Requirements: In the successful case, the verdict came down to a penalty imposed on a respondent for failure to provide a completion certificate. This highlights the legal environment wherein the builder had ensured their compliance relative to other parties involved.
2. Clear Documentation: The success indicates that when the processes were adhered to, the builder experienced favorable outcomes.

Conclusion

Overall, Sunny Real Construction Private Limited demonstrates a pattern where most issues stem from paperwork and compliance with legal requirements, particularly regarding QPR submissions. While they have successfully navigated certain legal challenges, potential buyers should be cautious due to the larger number of complaints against them.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Verify Documentation: Buyers should always request and verify project-related documentation such as QPRs, completion certificates, and other regulatory submissions.
2. Research Legal History: Investigating a builder's legal history can offer insights into their reliability and adherence to regulations. Consider reviews and case histories.
3. Consult Local Authorities: Engaging with local real estate regulatory bodies may provide additional context about the builder's reputation and any ongoing compliance issues.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check for Licenses and Certifications: Ensure the builder is properly licensed and carries relevant certifications to reassure their credibility.
• Review Projects and Client Feedback: Technical quality and customer satisfaction can vastly differ among builders. Look for reviews and testimonials from previous clients.
• Secure a Legal Consultation: Prior to finalizing any decision, a legal review of contracts and paperwork can protect buyers from potential pitfalls.

In conclusion, while Sunny Real Construction has demonstrated successes, caution is warranted. Buyers are encouraged to conduct meticulous due diligence before engaging with the builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against Sunny Real Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be primarily grouped into two categories: penalties for project delays and non-compliance with municipal orders.

The first type of case involves penalties imposed on the builder for failing to complete projects within the stipulated timeframe. For instance, in one significant case, a penalty of Rs. 25,000 was levied on the builder for its failure to submit a completion certificate within the required period. This highlights a troubling pattern of the builder's inability to meet deadlines, which is a common complaint in the construction sector.

The reasons contributing to these legal disputes often center around the builder's failure to adhere to the agreed timelines and regulatory requirements. Homebuyers and clients may contest penalties when they feel the delays are attributed to factors beyond the builder's control or when they dispute the severity of the penalties imposed. In the case of Sunny Real Construction, the penalty served as a case in point for the builder's non-compliance, paving the way for legal action against them.

As for the outcomes of these cases, the builder faced losses due to several common factors. Insufficient evidence to defend their position, failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings regarding project classification rules were frequently noted. The builder's inability to provide timely completion certificates, for example, demonstrates a significant lapse in fulfilling regulatory obligations, leading to the imposed penalties.

In conclusion, the analysis of these cases illustrates the importance of accountability in the construction industry. Builders must be mindful of their obligations to complete timely projects and comply with municipal orders. The patterns observed in Sunny Real Construction's cases serve as a warning to potential clients about the builder's reliability and the possible ramifications of their delays.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Sunny Real Construction Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The primary disputes categorized in this analysis revolve around non-compliance with regulatory requirements, specifically centered on the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs). Each case provides insight into various claims made against the builder and how they effectively defended against these assertions.

The common theme observed in these disputes is the allegations made by the Authority regarding the failure of the builder to submit QPRs as mandated by law. The claims often centered on the supposed non-compliance with these regulatory submissions, leading to notices being served against the builder.

The cases were primarily driven by dissatisfaction from the authority concerning project documentation. This generally stemmed from enforced regulations that were intended to ensure timely updates and transparency in project progress. Notably, the opposing party often alleged that the builder had failed to submit a required QPR, triggering these legal proceedings.

However, the builder’s consistent success in these cases points to several key reasons for their victory. In instances where the claims were made regarding non-submission of the QPRs, the builder was able to demonstrate compliance, often by showcasing documented evidence of timely submissions. In other instances, the authority acknowledged the submission of pending QPRs that rendered the proceedings unnecessary. This indicates that the builder maintained organized documentation and preparedness to address regulatory inquiries.

The favorable outcomes for Sunny Real Construction Private Limited also highlight broader trends in the real estate market. They suggest that while there may be legitimate grievances and claims within this domain, there are also occasions where builders face unfounded accusations or exaggerated claims. The builder’s track record indicates a robust capability to legally navigate these challenges, further reinforcing their reputation in the market.

For potential buyers, this analysis emphasizes the importance of careful consideration and due diligence when evaluating builders. Although there are valid disputes within the real estate sector, the ability of Sunny Real Construction Private Limited to defend against unjust claims serves as a reminder that not all allegations reflect the reality of a builder's operations. Buyers should rely on verified information and research before forming opinions about a builder's credibility, as accusations can sometimes be misleading.