No Logo Available

SUNRAYS INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

5.0/5 (2 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Haryana
CINU70101HR2011PTC041868
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressUnit No. 405A, 4th floor, Tower-B Unitech Business Park, Sector-41 Gurgaon Gurgaon HR 122001 IN
Company StatusPrivate

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited has made its mark in the real estate sector, particularly in Haryana. Despite being a key player, the company has faced legal challenges. This blog delves into their legal history, assessing the complaints lodged against them and providing insights for potential buyers.

Legal Overview

Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited has reported a total of 2 complaints, both of which have been resolved in favor of the builder, indicating a strong legal standing in the cases filed against them. Notably, they have a perfect record in legal disputes, with no cases lost.

Details of Legal Cases

  1. Case 1
    • Appellant Claim: The appellant alleged that Sunrays Infrastructure failed to provide necessary information online.
    • Respondent Claim: The builder contended that they had indeed submitted the required information, which was subsequently verified and deemed satisfactory.
    • Final Verdict: The case was disposed of in favor of Sunrays, …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Compliance and Information Disclosure Financial Disputes and Fee Payments

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes can primarily be grouped under two significant themes: 'Regulatory Compliance and Information Disclosure' and 'Financial Disputes and Fee Payments'. These themes reflect the main reasons that brought opposing parties into legal disagreements with Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited.

Under the theme of 'Regulatory Compliance and Information Disclosure,' one case involved claims from the appellant that the builder failed to submit requisite information online. However, the builder successfully demonstrated that the information had indeed been submitted as per regulations, leading to a favorable verdict for them. This illustrates a common pattern where accusations of non-compliance are made, often stemming from misunderstandings or erroneous claims by buyers.

The second theme, 'Financial Disputes and Fee Payments,' is evidenced by the case related to a dispute over a registration fee. The builder's defense established that …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review