CIN | U70101HR2011PTC041868 |
---|---|
Year Established | 10-Jan-11 |
Address | Unit No. 405A, 4th floor, Tower-B Unitech Business Park, Sector-41 Gurgaon Gurgaon HR 122001 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited has made its mark in the real estate sector, particularly in Haryana. Despite being a key player, the company has faced legal challenges. This blog delves into their legal history, assessing the complaints lodged against them and providing insights for potential buyers.
Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited has reported a total of 2 complaints, both of which have been resolved in favor of the builder, indicating a strong legal standing in the cases filed against them. Notably, they have a perfect record in legal disputes, with no cases lost.
Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited's legal track record paints a positive picture. With no lost cases and a quick resolution of disputes, buyers can be assured of the builder’s commitment to ethical practices. The firm's openness to rectify administrative oversights, as seen in case 2, shows a proactive attitude that benefits consumer trust.
Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited stands out as a competent builder with an impressive legal track record. For potential buyers, this serves as an indicator of the company's reliability. However, as with any real estate venture, due diligence is crucial to ensure a sound investment.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes can primarily be grouped under two significant themes: 'Regulatory Compliance and Information Disclosure' and 'Financial Disputes and Fee Payments'. These themes reflect the main reasons that brought opposing parties into legal disagreements with Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited.
Under the theme of 'Regulatory Compliance and Information Disclosure,' one case involved claims from the appellant that the builder failed to submit requisite information online. However, the builder successfully demonstrated that the information had indeed been submitted as per regulations, leading to a favorable verdict for them. This illustrates a common pattern where accusations of non-compliance are made, often stemming from misunderstandings or erroneous claims by buyers.
The second theme, 'Financial Disputes and Fee Payments,' is evidenced by the case related to a dispute over a registration fee. The builder's defense established that the fee had been duly deposited, resulting in a quick resolution of the case. This underscores the reality that financial disagreements might arise, but proper documentation and prompt actions by builders can often mitigate disputes.
These cases showcase a trend: many claims are brought against the builder often due to confusion about compliance matters or financial obligations. It is noteworthy to observe that the builder's successful defenses often hinged on the insufficiency of evidence provided by the opposing party or misinterpretations regarding obligations under applicable laws or agreements. Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited has demonstrated resilience in addressing and dispelling claims, whether they arise from misunderstandings or unfounded accusations.
These insights indicate a firm reputation of Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited in the realm of real estate. The ability to navigate legal challenges effectively portrays a builder well-versed in regulatory protocols and proper practices. Interestingly, these cases reveal a possibility where buyers might make accusations that later may not hold substantial validity, emphasizing the necessity for diligence in handling disputes related to real estate transactions.
For potential buyers, it is crucial to approach claims and reputations of builders such as Sunrays Infrastructure Private Limited with a critical eye. While the real estate market does have its share of legitimate disputes, the analysis of these legal cases suggests that builders can frequently defend themselves against unjust claims. Thus, buyers are urged to carefully consider all available information and conduct thorough research before forming opinions on a builder’s credibility.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2045 of 2019 | Haryana | The respondent deposited the deficit registration… | ["Deficit registrat… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The … | Sunrays Infrastruct… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MjAxMDg= | |
2519 of 2019 | Haryana | The case was disposed off as the respondent submi… | ["Online submission… | {"appellant_claim(in detail)": "The appellant cla… | Haryana Real Estate… | Sunrays Infrastruct… | https://haryanarera.gov.in/assistancecontrol/viewOrderPdf/MjQxODQ= |