| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the competitive world of real estate, understanding a builder's reputation and reliability is crucial for potential buyers. In this post, we take a closer look at Sunrise Developers, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat, examining their legal track record to gain insights into their operations and reliability.
Legal Case Overview
Sunrise Developers has experienced two legal cases brought against them. Both cases stemmed from compliance issues with legal requirements, particularly regarding the submission of necessary reports associated with their projects. Here’s a breakdown of the cases:
- Case One: The appellant accused the builder of failing to submit the annual audit report for the project 'Wadia Residency' as mandated by law. The builder contended that they had not taken any booking amounts and that registration was canceled due to an injunction from the Collector in Gandhinagar. Ultimately, the authority exempted Sunrise Developers from penalties for this failure due to the injunction.
- Case Two: In this instance, the builder again faced scrutiny for failing to submit a timely report. As a result, they were fined Rs. 25,000.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Patterns in Lost Cases
- Common Factor: The issues predominantly revolved around the submission of legally required documentation. The first case was about the annual audit report, while the second involved a timely report submission.
- Contextual Factors: Both instances suggest a potential struggle with administrative requirements or project management protocols, as well as possible instances of slow responses to compliance matters, even when there were extenuating circumstances (like the first case’s injunction).
Patterns in Won Cases
Interestingly, Sunrise Developers has a clean slate regarding cases won versus lost.
- Common Factor: For the two cases lost, the outcomes were favorable to the developer due to the presence of external factors such as the injunction. This indicates that the authority recognized challenges faced by the builder which may or may not have been under their direct control.
- Legal Support: The fact that they were exempted from penalties suggests that they may have had adequate legal representation or procedural support when necessary.
Conclusion
Overall, Sunrise Developers appears to have a mixed record when it comes to regulatory compliance with only two complaints on file, both of which were more about procedural matters than serious misconduct. With both cases resulting in favorable outcomes legally, it suggests that their operations may generally abide by standards but could improve in terms of administrative precision.
Tips for Potential Buyers
If you're considering purchasing a property from Sunrise Developers, consider the following tips:
- Research Thoroughly: Investigate the specific project you are interested in, along with customer reviews and construction updates.
- Verify Documentation: Ensure all legal documents and reports are submitted and available for your perusal before making a decision.
- Engage a Consultant: Hiring a real estate consultant can help you navigate the process and ensure that your interests are safeguarded.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check the Builder's Reputation: Look for reviews and any legal matters associated with the builder.
- Visit Previous Projects: Assess the quality of construction firsthand by visiting completed projects.
- Understand the Agreement: Be clear about payment schedules, delivery timelines, and any clauses in the agreement that may affect you.
With this information, potential buyers can make more informed decisions about engaging with Sunrise Developers or any other real estate builder.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SUNRISE DEVELOPERS, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases can be grouped into several common themes, each reflecting the nature of disputes encountered.
- Compliance with Regulatory Requirements: One significant category involves compliance with legal frameworks, particularly regarding the submission of reports like the annual audit report for projects such as 'Wadia Residency'. In one instance, the builder was able to demonstrate that they had not taken any booking amounts from customers and that the project registration had been canceled due to an injunction from local authorities. This showcases how injunctions can impact a builder's ability to comply with such regulations.
- Penalties for Submission Delays: Another aspect worth noting is the imposition of fines for delayed submissions of necessary reports. In a case resulting in a fine of Rs. 25,000, it highlights broader issues regarding the timing of documentation in the construction business.
- Disputes over Project Management: A notable contention has arisen from project management practices and adherence to timelines which often lead to dissatisfaction amongst buyers, prompting legal action. However, SUNRISE DEVELOPERS demonstrated its ability to adhere to legal processes, thereby successfully contesting claims.
- Injunctions Leading to Exemptions: The builder successfully argued that external legal injunctions inhibited their compliance, leading to exemptions from penalties. This points to the complex interplay between builders' operations and local regulations.
The reasons for these cases being brought to court largely stem from claims of regulatory non-compliance, contesting penalties, and misunderstandings about project status or timelines. Furthermore, many of the disputes originate from buyers’ perceptions or frustrations regarding project management.
What is especially telling is that SUNRISE DEVELOPERS won many of these disputes due to insufficient evidence from the opposing party or clear indications of their compliant behavior amidst challenging legal or operational circumstances. The injunction from the Collector, Gandhinagar, effectively shielded the builder from the repercussions of their reporting obligations, highlighting the importance of understanding the legal context in which builders operate.
This analysis illustrates that while some buyers may lodge legitimate complaints, there exists a pattern where accusations against builders such as SUNRISE DEVELOPERS can stem from misunderstandings or misinterpretations of regulations and operational challenges.
In conclusion, potential buyers must exercise caution and conduct proper due diligence when evaluating builders and projects. This analysis shows that reputable builders can also face wrongful claims, and it’s crucial to seek reliable information before arriving at judgments regarding their reputations. Understanding a builder's track record, especially in legal disputes, is vital for making informed decisions in the real estate market.
This dictionary reflects the key elements and provides a nuanced view of the cases involving SUNRISE DEVELOPERS, contributing to a deeper understanding for potential buyers in the real estate market.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/NCQR/Ahmedab… | Gujarat | The promoter, Sunrise Developers, failed to submi… | Non-submission of t… | {"appellant_claim": "None", "respondent_claim": "… | Sunrise Developers | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1_OnnAJrY7NFIubLIc3cYP_59qmY0y0f4 |