SUPER CONSTRUCTION

Introduction

In the competitive world of real estate, selecting the right builder is paramount for ensuring a smooth and satisfying property investment. Super Construction, operating primarily in Maharashtra, has drawn attention due to both its legal challenges and successes. This post dives into the builder’s legal history, examining the patterns in their complaints and outcomes while offering insights for prospective buyers.

Legal Overview of Super Construction

Super Construction has encountered a total of 2 complaints, resulting in 1 case won and 1 case lost. These legal battles provide a glimpse into the builder's operational practices and their interactions with clients and regulatory frameworks.

Detailed Legal Case Analysis

1. Case Won:
   • Appellant Claim: The appellant argued that ex-parte orders were passed without sufficient grounds.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder contended that these orders were warranted due to the appellant’s lack of cooperation.
   • Final Verdict: The court favored …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Super Construction, where the builder lost, reveals several key points across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder. The cases highlight key themes, with the most notable being the recurring issue of ex-parte orders and the builder's failure to cooperate, which led to adverse judgments.

The ex-parte orders theme encompasses cases where the builder was held non-compliant due to a lack of cooperation, resulting in the court issuing orders without full input from the builder. This points to a broader pattern where cases often revolved around the builder's failure to meet regulatory requirements or to work constructively with other parties involved in the construction process.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases included contesting the validity of ex-parte orders, with the builder claiming lack of sufficient grounds for their issuance. The underlying issues often revolved around perceived procedural injustices rather than factual disputes …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Super Construction, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily revolve around three common themes: Documentation and Submission Disputes, Regulatory Compliance Issues, and Claims of Bias Towards Submitted Evidence. Each of these themes encompasses various types of disputes that were brought before the courts.

The cases categorized under Documentation and Submission Disputes highlight arguments regarding the adequacy and timeliness of written submissions. For instance, the appellant in one case sought to re-record submissions and judgments, claiming they were not adequately captured. However, the defense from the builder maintained that the relevant submissions had already been documented, resulting in the dismissal of the review application.

Regulatory Compliance Issues indicate conflicts regarding adherence to essential regulations and municipal orders. Builders often face claims relating to non-compliance or misunderstandings over such regulations. The builders' successful navigation and adherence to the legal …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis